Very little is known about the Treasure after the October Revolution, but it appears that during World War II all the valuables held by the Soviet state (and presumably of the Romanian state) were taken out from Moscow and sent toward the regions which were 'not endangered'. However, it is clear that they were not kept sealed, as the agreement with the Romanian government said, as the chests of the archives which were returned in 1935 had obviously been rummaged through and many objects and documents were missing.
And from that, you get a title of "nation of thieves"?
OH, I'm sorry. Does that wiki page contradict itself?
How about you instruct me on which inconsistencies I am to ignore, and then I will go along with your title of "nation of thieves", and then """reparations""" can be made, under the assumption that all behind the scenes banking negotiations are known, despite "Very little is known about the Treasure after the October Revolution"?
Right. And you don't know who, why or where. But that makes all Russians thieves in your book, despite that former country no longer existing and most people alive today, not having been born. According to you.
Actual tl:dr:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanian_Treasure#The_Treasure_since_1917
And from that, you get a title of "nation of thieves"?
Are you fucking illiterate?
OH, I'm sorry. Does that wiki page contradict itself?
How about you instruct me on which inconsistencies I am to ignore, and then I will go along with your title of "nation of thieves", and then """reparations""" can be made, under the assumption that all behind the scenes banking negotiations are known, despite "Very little is known about the Treasure after the October Revolution"?
No, some items were returned. Most of them weren't.
Among them, 120 tons of gold.
Right. And you don't know who, why or where. But that makes all Russians thieves in your book, despite that former country no longer existing and most people alive today, not having been born. According to you.