A nation of thieves
(en.wikipedia.org)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Yes. I read the word "It's" which apparently was your answer to 5 different Questions asked of you. I'm sorry that you are not a smart man.
Ownership of gold, from a defunct government that hasn't existed in over 80 years since a coupe during a world War? OK. Sure. But WHO in Romania? And who in Russia has it now? And why did Russia occupy Romania after the war? And what was in the documents seized by the Russian government?
I'm not. I am just trying to inform you of the objective facts, through Questions, on the topics of which you have Questions on.
Wtf are you talking about? Romania is a sovereign nation, Just because the government changes doesn't mean it loses any rights or responsibilities.
It quite literally states in the article that the Soviets confiscated the gold. Russia is the legal successor of the Soviet Union so they have inherited the responsibilities. They need to figure out where the gold is and give it back.
It is fucking hilarious that you are trying to make a case for fucking Russia to steal stuff from other countries. You probably also think it's perfectly fine for Russia to plunder Ukrainian museums.
A nation of thieves supported by cucked simps. Pathetic.
You do understand that both time and history exists don't you?
Yes. I also understand that Russia has a long history of taking what belongs to others.
You really want to deny that?
Denying that vague sentence on what you believe? Yes. I wish to deny and appose all that you are.