It really is an interesting point you bring up. There's sort of a parallel question which is: for all the hate directed towards various public figures, why hasn't anyone taken them out, or even suggested it in a less than joking way?
On one branch, you have liberals that detest Trump, and think that if he's reelected that will be the end of Western civilization or some such. I know they hate guns, but how has there never been a public assassination attempt? They sure are loony and violent enough, right?
On the other branch, so many awakened people are aware of the murderous outrages of Hillary and Gates and Fauci, etc,, yet no one has ever tried to take them out either. And these sentiments are supposedly held by the people that are gun nuts, too.
There are two general answers, I think. One s that people are victims of learned helplessness and too pussified to actually take any action. I would say, sure, that's part of the cause of what we see.
The other is that we're seeing real human nature, and properly functioning humans find violence abhorrent. They are repulsed by the idea, even when under lethal threat.
So I would summarize by saying, yes, tons of Assange supporters are just virtue signalling, but beneath that, there are many people that are still relying--rightly or wrongly--on all the various social institutions we have created over the centuries to peacefully resolve disputes.
A guy named Jeff Cooper said it in a bit of a different way, but when the time comes when a man has to leave his house and take direct action, it's a form of suicide to all that he had been up to that point.
He was kidnapped, out of the Ecuadorian embassy back in 2016. A few at the time even claim to have watched it live on webcam in the middle of the night. Since then we can presume he's either been in a black site or more likely dead. Not a whisper of a rumor--real or fake--has come along since then of his actual status.
If anyone's suspicions were aroused over him being "too sick" to attend his latest trial--even via webcam--you have your explanation.
I'll have to watch the video to see if this is duplicative, but to avoid that I'll be brief: a while ago I stumbled across the origin of the weaponization of prions. Quite damning circumstantial evidence, IMHO.
I've never seen the pieces put together anywhere so I'll have to write it up in a post one of these days. In the meantime, anyone with even moderate interest can put these few pieces together:
- The book "Brain Trust: The Hidden Connections Between Mad Cow and Misdiagnosed Alzheimer's Disease" by Colm A. Kelleher (2004)
- Daniel Carleton Gajdusek
- Joseph Edward Smadel
- The paper "The Possession of Kuru: Medical Science and Biocolonial Exchange"
Not that this comes as a surprise to anyone, but more for the historical record.
Good points!
It was always a little weird, wasn't it, that BG set up shop way up in the corner of the country instead of Silicon Valley or Boston or LA. MS was in Albuquerque for the first four years, so then they decide to go to Bellevue of all places?
Hmmm, yet you trouble yourself to respond so aggressively to a "long rant about the insignificant Jodie Foster".
Keep troubling yourself with such posts to make it even more obvious I've touched on a nerve that They send Their lame lackey to mewl about.
have ayh got this right? lololololololol
bcz remember how ayh said ayh like to fuck with their heads? lolololololol
Since you mention "Contact", maybe I can use that to shoehorn in my thesis about Carl Sagan! Let me know if you saw this left turn coming....
IDK if you've seen any of my comments about it (which I generally keep very low-key just because no one is interested), but I'm a 100% believer in the Anunnaki, and I'm certain Carl Sagan was also.
He suggested we should look to archaeology for evidence of extraterrestrial visitation a decade before Sitchin published! The thing is, for his career he traded ever talking about them again.
But he did leave a lot of clues laying around. There's actually an avalanche of evidence he thought that way collected here:
I don't agree with every detail, of course, but the overall thesis is quite sound. One correction I might offer, for example, concerns the author photo on the inside cover of the hardback edition of "Contact". You'll see a copy of the photo about halfway down the page.
From a certain set of evidence, I conclude the "winged disc" symbol represents Nibiru itself, the home planet--actually small star system--of the Anunnaki. You'll notice the Egyptians always depicted it as a dull red, which may well have been close to the visible color of the brown dwarf star.
Anyway, did that crazy Egyptian symbol end up in the photo behind him by accident? I sure don't think so.
Great comment and great news!
I sometimes feel like we've been completely deceived and lost track of what normal health is for the human body. Like if you brought someone from a few generations ago back from the past with a time machine and showed them all the health problems we think are just "par for the course", they would think they'd actually been taken to Hell.
When I was a child no one had ever heard of anyone having any sort of problem making as many babies as they wanted (and then maybe one surprise after that). Fertility trouble was absolutely not a "thing".
So best of luck making some babies! We need all the people we can get to help get us out of this mess!
The thing is, even though Lugol's is twice the price of the cheap stuff, that means (drum roll)... an extra $7 a couple of times a year. A bottle lasts a helluva long time.
As rough as Bidenomics is on all of us, I feel everyone should splurge on any kind of iodine they feel they want... lol
I came across this very same 4chan post not long after it was written and just had it in the back of my mind. A while later, I had to pad an order to get free shipping and threw in a bottle of the cheapest iodine they had.
I had no idea what it was supposed to do. My short attention span and limited retention left only the message, "We're deficient in iodine because it used to be in Morton's iodized salt when no one knew what it meant and no one uses Morton's any more."
So I expected nothing and began to titrate with 1 drop a day. I never noticed any other effect, but after a week I began to sleep like a baby again. The stuff is powerful, and I'm only up to 5 drops of it in some water before bed. I've experimented backing off to 4 drops and I can easily tell the difference. Falling asleep is never a problem, nor is light, noise, etc.
As stated, I use the cheap stuff, about $7 for a 2oz bottle of "potassium iodine & iodide". That bottle lasts for longer than I can possibly remember when I bought it. Maybe there are better ones, but the cheapest stuff does the trick for me.
There's a related point. not concerning Trump directly, to which I would like to draw everyone's attention.
That is, I personally would consider it reasonable and rational for anyone to look at this and think, "With all the other crazy shit that goes on, a third of a billion seems wayyyy out of line for some sort of misstatements about real estate valuations. If that's even what it was because it was not so outrageous I'm even clear on precisely what he is supposed to have done. I can see that if you get crossways with The System, they'll come get you, and if I ever get crossways with The System, they'll come get me too. Therefore, I object to this on those grounds."
It seems quite simple and straightforward, and even a matter of self-interest if not self-preservation. But observe how very few have such an analysis of it.
My point is that I--once again--realize how very differently others process the world than what I would naturally assume. I should avoid making that mistake and try to understand how they actually do process the world. Anyone reading this may wish to keep the same thought in mind.
As I alluded to, there's more to come on Jodie Foster that I have never seen anyone come close to mentioning. When "They" wish to keep things secret, They do indeed take steps to do so and you've got to carefully sift through all the dirt.
The truth about that wench is yet another I'm compelled to speak into the Universe.
I was trying to keep the post as short as possible, but I would add that the mainstream now admits that the armored door of the limousine was at all times between Hinckley and Reagan. They claim that the round that hit him ricocheted off the car and passed through the narrow "slot" between open door and the side of the car. Believe this if you will.
But adding that in, you have to consider even more impossible scenarios than I described. For example, did Dead Eye Hinckley bank one through the slot to hit Reagan, then wildly fire 5 more at the crowd on the sidewalk causing 3 incapacitations?
What if he shot as straight as a normal person would and some of them at least hit the door that Reagan was behind? If we subtract those from the 5, how many do we have left to cause 3 critical hits?
There are innumerable videos and articles concerning concealed carry and "stopping power" and "wound channels" and "hydrostatic shock" and similar topics. If Hinckley did what they say he did, there would be a single YT video on concealed carry titled, "Get the cheapest shitty gun for concealed carry because it's enough to take out four people immediately".
So what do they actually say about all this? Search on "reagan assassination concealed carry" and you won't find a single related hit. Why? Because the narrative is ludicrous on it's face. Normies subconsciously know to steer clear of all such things. In fact, it's what makes them normies. And, again, conspiracy theorists already know the answer and think no further about it.
Keep in mind that Hinckley Jr. is the only one who might have been told it was a movie set, and that's pure speculation. No one knows what he was told except him and, frankly, they've had four decades to convince him of whatever they would like to convince him of.
If you watch the mainstream interviews after his release, he adds absolutely nothing to the gaping black hole where his planning and preparation for the event should be. He basically says, "I just woke up that day and decided to do it."
Everyone is free to believe that if they so choose but I do not.
I think there's very little awareness that about 40% of your property taxes go to the public school system.
If there was any politician brave enough to speak this aloud and propose that if you home school your children then you get that 40% back, the public school system would only survive a matter of weeks.
Did anyone notice just how lame the creative writing is on this? Seriously, if you were in charge of the team at CTR or ShareBlue or whoever is handling this and someone brought this to you, you'd shake your head and tell them to GTFO.
But no, someone there said, "This is gold! Let's run with it!" Bizarre.
Indeed, Wallace was insightful and spoke a little too plainly. That why they had to shoot him when he ran for President in 1972.
Too long to write up now, but there's an interesting historical note. Wallace was the "segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever" guy. After he got shot and was laying the hospital, he realized the error of his ways. He called local black leaders to his hospital room, asked forgiveness, and was given it.
IIRC this stat, correctly, when Wallace ran again for Governor of Alabama, he won with a higher percentage of the black vote than Obama did in his campaign for President.
All memory-holed, for obvious reasons.