This video gets the gist of it in 90sec. https://youtu.be/Ow-MN7qJnIY

Anyone in the cryptospace based in fundamentals knew FTX was a bad idea and a scam from the start.

I'd like to point out that Cryptocurrencies allow us to have decentralized exchanges, free of any middlemen. No one to embezzle, pull an exit scam or make a single-minded bad decision.

Starting a centralized exchange in 2019 could only be motivated by nefarious intentions. There are already billions of dollars being traded on DEXs.

Decentralized Autonomous Organizations scare the shit out of TPTB. That's why there's a huge campaign against blockchain projects.

If the average person realized that blockchains can give us fair and decentralized versions of any company or service, there would be a revolution in a week or two.

Open, auditable and fair elections? No problem. We can have Direct democracy and representative models at the same time. Not only political elections, but shareholders meetings, etc. Wouldn't it be nice if employees/citizens had a vote about raises and bonuses?

Prepaid Car Insurance? How about you prepay your deductable and nothing else until you have a claim?

How about ISP's and cell phones? Meshnetworks are already available for deployment. We can easily replace and add to existing infrastructure.

Open source, decentralization is the only way to a better future.

Anyone hating on 'crypto' because of central banking digital currencies, or other centralized coins, is either shilling or hasn't thought things through. Hating all crypto is like hating all stocks because of something AAPL did.

Crypto is the only thing that allows modern commerce to continue to function while eliminating central banks, corporate corruption, and predatory business.

The real revolutionaries are dumping all fiat into privacy coins with DAOs. Not trading them back for fiat profit.

For the first time in modern history, there's actually something people can be doing to change the world and free themselves. It's non-violent and as unstoppable as the human spirit.

Your gains are fueling your continued slavery. Think bigger.

Privacy coins like Monero and dero or scrt.network which enables wrapping nonprivacy coins in a privacy layer are where it is at.

Why make the mistake of centralization again? Use trustless p2p systems.

Novelty theory?

Yeah, fuck no. Everyone capable of independent thought could see through the bullshit by february.

I'll admit I was vaguely concerned in late 2018 when the HK protests were going strong and the chinese whistleblowers started talking about a virus with no coverage in the west.

By the time it made US news, there was already more than enough evidence of a hoax, and an obvious agenda.

Animals and plants are not at lower 'densities'.

If you think there is a difference between the parties go sit in on a congressional session and watch them vote on a 'highly-partisan' issue.

A majority of everyone votes one way, the bill passes and then politicians raise their hands and say 'hey actually I want to change my vote to be recorded as a nay.'

So the only way to know how someone actually voted is to go see it live.

If voting someone into office could actually change anything, they would never let us do it.

It's still there, the video is just set to not allow embedding.

Formaldehyde forming as a metabolite is a bit of a limited hangout.

One reason why aspartame was first denied as a sweetener for drinks is because it is unstable in liquid form.

Aspartame in liquids starts breaking down into formaldehyde around 80f. How hot do you think a trailer gets in the sun?

Wikileaks is not a good entity. If they had honest intentions, they would not sit on information. They would actually provide transparency and the free flow of information.

Wikileaks purposely plays into global politics, picks sides and attempts to release choice information at times they deem may have the most impact.

Impact for what? They said they were committed to the truth and transparency...

Whistleblowing to a centralized source is the dumbest thing.

I'm not a christian. I just know how to read, which you seem to be struggling with.

Thanks, no one else seems to want to acknowledge the opium wars.

For those that don't know, the gist is:

China tried to outlaw opium because it was ruining the country. Great Brittain waged war on China to keep their opium business going.

The 2nd time around was the same but France joined GB.

Why doesn't anyone talk about getting reparations from GB and the heirs of the East India Company? They had a basic monopoly on the slave and drug trades...

First of all, Luke is in every version of the bible, and translations don't really contradict each other. https://biblehub.com/luke/17-21.htm

Second, organized christianity teaches the opposite of this.

Third, the bible/christianity does not have a monopoly on any phrasing of 'everything comes from within."

Don't look for authority on right and wrong outside of yourself. Take responsibility for your own beliefs and actions.

If you happen to believe everything that Sikh's do, that's fine, but dont believe anything because Sikh's do. Dont follow anyone blindly. Make decisions in every moment, dogmas lead to the world we have today.

The kingdom of heaven is within you. Don't take direction from any organized religion. Discern right from wrong your self.

The first step to learning is to make yourself teachable.

You haven't even demonstrated that you can read.

I don't want you to engage in 20 questions. I want people to think. I've been on conspiracy boards since the BBS days, it isn't sustainable or fruitful to spoonfeed people.

I don't want people to agree with me, or anyone else. I want people to quit falling for fallacies like trusted sources. I want people to think for themselves and quit being herded.

Links are worthless if you don't take the time to understand.

Spend more time developing critical skills rather than compiling facts. Study logic, philosophy, military strategy, psychology, economics, etc.

Focus on learning how to think, not finding links about what to think.

I'm not going to beg the metaphor. The point is to go for the root cause.

16M is not the root cause, and attacking the 16M is not a winning strategy. That's directly playing into the antisemitism trap laid out in front of you.

You can call out the ruling powers and even dismantle the entire jewish control of media, banking and everything if you just quit falling into the trap. And perpetuating your serfdom.

Understand more.

If you're even entertaining the masons with your time, you have a lot to learn. If you can't narrow down your enemy below 16m people, you're retarded or shilling.

Who hired the Rothschilds?

Understand more. Strategize more. Nothing in that post is relevant to what I said.

Do you want to stop low level thugs or take down the whole cartel?

It's not entirely correct to blame jews. That's like blaming all cells for cancer instead of just the cancer cells themselves. Don't continue to play into their trap.

The namestealers decided to hide among the Jewish people during the crusades. The khazarian mafia.

You all are attacking the decoy. The average Jewish person has as much jewish privilege as the average white has white privilege.

I don't deny the societal control that is highlighted here, but strategically, you're playing a part scripted for you long ago.

It may seem like 0.2% of the population is an elite class, but that is how the antisemitism strat works. That's still 16million people though. Those in control, the ones linked in this thread are maybe 0.2% of the 0.2%.

Many of the 16million might actually side against the elites, if they weren't all lumped in together. Maybe the 16m, would study the truth of how their people suffer for the sake of the namestealers...

There is not a homogeneous ruling class, we could divide and conquer just like they do.

Nattokinase for those concerned about the spike protein. Too lazy to find a link but do a scholar search.

Study indigenous peoples and zoology and you'll get why your premise is flawed.

People probably don't want to waste their time presenting a case to someone who probably won't read it, or even attempt to understand it. There is not a discussion to be had, the post is wrong.

Claims like 'humans are the only creatures that need tech to survive' are telling of someone who is not very educated in zoology.

One google search, could eliminate your ignorance, but instead you start calling people bots. That's why no one wants to waste their time explaining.

Humans don't need any more tech or commerce for survival, just for convenience.

We dont need tech or commerce any more than any other species.

Read the tiktok TOS and PrivacyPolicy, etc and compare to instagram. That's what people are talking about. Data tiktok collects from outside of tiktok, more than whatever people post and watch on it.