Unless you got a majority of users to do this it would probably cause more harm then good, as the people that spam the trigger words are also most likely to be the people that they want to monitor the most.
They have so much computational power that it's unlikely you'd big down their machines, and would end up just helping create their list faster.
Now if your favorite messaging client defaulted to sending those trigger words in everyone's messages, then that might be more effective camo.
In the late 90s 'jam echelon day' was a pretty big thing among the tech savy.
https://www.thing.net/~rdom/ecd/jam.html
I dont intend to try to discourage anyone, just to help you do whatever your going to do in the most thought out way.
Yeah, it'd be such a terrible thing to prevent companies from being able to access, buy and sell my data without permission and reimbursement.
Pkvi, stop getting implementation confused with underlying technology.
Do you hate language? Because language is used to enslave us. The water that gives you life is also giving life to your enemy. Surely, we should ban all water.
I'm anti BTC, ETH, XRP, and a million other projects because they are bad implementations for various reasons. A wide concept like 'decentralized identity' doesn't even necessitate a cryptocurrency, it could be a blockchain with no currency.
A decentralized blockchain is just a database that can be mathematically guaranteed to not be tampered with. No need to just some authority like say your bank or gov.
You're just hating on computers entirely. Which could be valid position if you weren't using one right now.
Please start providing meaningful commentary on specific implementations you dont like, if you would like to be more effective.
SARS-cov2 is a real virus, but covid is a vague set of symptoms and is 100% fake.
There was/is no SARS-cov2 pandemic.
It may seem like a pedantic difference, but this is where most arguments about the hoax stem from. People not being specific and correct in their language. If we use words deliberately, we can try to avoid all the the semantic arguments like this.
This same exact plot was attempted with swine flu, avian flu, SARS-cov, and MERS. The predictions of deaths, the demand and funding for vaccines, etc all identical to early SARS-cov2 coverage. Since there was no natural animal reservoir for the virus, the virus disappeared before a vaccine would be created.
The only difference this time is that they went back to a trick they learned with Polio and AIDS. Don't count cases by viral infection, count them by non specific symptoms, and narrow the set of symptoms after vaccine/medication rollout to trick people into thinking that its working.
Early covid was definitely, strategically the smartest period for TPTB, even if it was accidental. Foreign coverage of something happening in china for a couple months before it hit the news here... you'd have to be nonfunctional to not be concerned about what could be happening.
Just enough info was leaked so that the people watching really closely, conspiracy types like us, would be the first to start disseminating the fact that something is happening.
Fortunately, as soon as governments started to make mention of it the hoax was readily apparent.
Tucker and most people's problem is they still think thay countries are relevant. They're afraid of what china/russia/nk might do. Instead of seeing that 99.99% of countries are in lockstep to the bankers drums.
It's important to remember to think global and act local. That's what TPTB do too.
The changes you can make are in your own life, your friends, family, etc. If everyone stops the fuckery in their own town, then there won't be any place for fuckery to take foot.
Refuse to be complicit in fuckery. Don't buy that phone, dont buy those shoes, don't watch their tv/movies. Don't use their banks, take their loans, etc. Don't work for the enemy. Don't have sympathy for those that knowingly negate their own freedoms as well as yours for the sake of convenience.
There's a fuckload you can do, but sadly everyone has been tricked into thinking that their actions dont matter, or that it would be too difficult or impractical to go without some things.
Be the change you want to see. Phrases are generally cliche because they're true.
If you're sourcing your food locally from sustainable farms, and not from BlackRock megafarms, there's nothing wrong with sitting back and grilling. All in all, the less attention and energy we give the enemy the better.
Maybe, if they are actually restraining themselves, and not just being secretive.
What I mean more though is that one must already be inclined to a certain action in order to have inhibitions. 'I want to do that, but I stopped myself'
If you have no want to do something, then completely removing all inhibitions wouldn't increase your proclivity to it.
Therefore social media has just enabled whores that were too lazy/afraid/secretive to be blatant whores in real life to be whores online.
Don't hate on anything that allows people to show their true nature. It'll save you a lot of time.
Social media hasn't done anything to anyone. People are doing things with social media. It's the same as alcohol. No such thing as nice people that are mean drunks, they're just mean people that can hide it while sober.
All of the ones I've looked into are megafarms and processors... fuck em. Sure there's something fishy going on, but it's been going on a whole lot longer than these fires.
Start eating real food, sourced as locally as possible.
Some people use the oxygen they breathe to enable them to rape and kill. Is oxygen bad?
If you dont have a clear vision of good and evil, you dont stand for something, and can't distinguish a tool from it's implementation, then you're just a contrarian noisemaker.
Can you cite any specifics? I watched the show twice, like it, but nothing really stood out as predictive programming. Just written by smart people who are well informed. It wasn't written all that long ago, every element of today's world was already in play when they were writting.
What did I miss/forget?
I do think the show was headed in a different direction though, and it changed due to events which happened during the course season one and two airing.
No body sane would wish indiscriminate death on millions of people.
I don't give a fuck about any government, or nation, what you say is inhuman.
You clearly need more life experience to widen your worldview before you are capable of having opinions on what 'sane' cares are.
That's not owning your own data, nor is it decentralized. That's already what we have in the current central banking system.
You're still confusing cryptocurrency and blockchain; implementations vs the underlying technology.
None of the things you cite are inherent to blockchains. All of them are possible and more probable in centralized banking.
None of your cited experiences provide any relevance to blockchains.
I never proposed that encryption makes blockchains secure. They are tamper-evident, but if you're worrying about encryption being the weak point in blockchains then cryptocurrencies are the least of your concerns, so you might want to triage a little.
Also encryption itself is almost never broken. Poor implementations lead to decryption, or computational power increases so that exhaustive bruteforcing becomes trivial on old algos. All algos have an expected EOL.
Web3 is a name brand created by polkadot. Web 3.0 is a marketing buzzword. Web 3.0 will be defined when the marketing people want to start pitching web 4.0, just like web 1.0 and 2.0.
You don't provide any alternative to the things you oppose, it's just all FUD all the time.