The joose is on the loose again but traded in that white bronco for a papier-mâché rainbow colored pirate ship gliding down Pennsylvania Ave on a ocean of astro glide mixed with human shit, the smell is offensive.
It totally does, it goes into federal jurisdiction if people are communicating from different states. You know conspiracy charges. Me thinks the federales want you ignorant of this information.
Freudian slip he actually said "He's thoroughly uniformed." because he thinks they were talking about the ice cream man.
Considering the military applications I'd suggest DARPA
even in the US it's illegal to conspire actual solutions.
That's a ridiculously false statement, if you use a technology that you know is heavily surveilled by the government to "conspire" you are unnecessarily adding a level of complexity to a conversation that can be had in a public park or private residence freely.
I have no sympathy for anyone willingly living under a monarchy in the 21st century.
dogmatically protected from any possibility to be disproven.
My fax machine must be on the fritz because I never got that memo. What's stopping you?
it always fails
Interesting, I completely disagree. Who am I to judge whether someone's art fails to convey whatever message or feeling the artist intended? If you and I watch the same movie (The Usual Suspects) will you and I notice the same things or identify with the same characters? Isn't that the failure of whoever is "judging" the art? Isn't it actually just a mirror with a unique tinge?
systematic philosopher
Is that what you are aiming for?
My point was we judge all the time whether something is true or false and judging in that sense is absolutely necessary and everyone does it.
In my experience that is absolutely not the case, there's maybe a handful of actual thinkers in the world and a fuck load of parrots
I'm not a fan of Jung other than his work on synchronicity But there's some Nietzsche I can get inside
Science has a history of being wrong for a span then corrected then being wrong then being corrected for us to assume what is known about the climate is correct is foolish to say the least and hubristic at most same goes with all fields of science.
Then why that totally murky and suspcious story about Einshtein is so believble for you?
Because Einstein at his worst was a once in a generation thinker, whatevers been built upon his observations I cannot say the same and many very smart people have spent a lot of time trying to disprove his observations
What does it mean to discern something accurately? To know whether someone is lying or being dishonest? I find that's intuition at work and not conscious thought there's a book called Blink that talks about that subject in depth
There's shades between those two extremes that make this a beautiful adventure. For example if you knew nothing of art would you consider this Jackson Pollock and this Vincent Van Gogh expressing the same depth of emotion? or as it appears to me is it completely subjective to each person what moves them? I don't know what infinitely simple or infinitely complex means because infinite is a word used to describe something literally beyond our comprehension.
I haven't met a single thinking person who believes what's being said about the climate. We have far too narrow a view within recorded history to have any idea what we (modern science 🤔) are talking about.
No matter what, you are a part of some herd.
I know which you are, can you guess which I am? Nietzsches Sheep and Wolves
There is indeed for those incapable of grasping what is being discussed.
"Genius is making complex ideas simple, not making simple ideas complex."
"Genius abhors consensus because when consensus is reached, thinking stops. Stop nodding your head."
Albert Einstein
You are learning! 👏🏻👏🏻
Tucker Carlson does not represent me. Why don't you go sit down in a coffee house and have a conversation with a real person and learn that smart people are the ones who learn from their mistakes, not those that hold unrealistic expectations of others while not holding themselves to the same standard.
We are not yet in a world where they can blatantly contradict physical books on known scientific findings and assuming that nothing you read can possibly be the truth because of the source means they've programmed you effectively.
That's some tongue in cheek shit right there! The parent company of Google, Alphabet, has been the largest stockholder in Aquanet for the past thirty years. They have hundreds of thousands of employees who's entire job for their eight hours shifts is standing in a privacy walled parking lot and double fisting cans of Aquanet into the air. They can be spotted by the fantastic body their hair seemingly naturally has, it pays six hundred and twenty three dollars an hour and has the added benefit of all the Aquanet you can eat. /s
Yeah we can't allow people to learn from their mistakes! If they aren't born being absolutely correct what good are they?! Fuckin' Humans!
Simple does
It is absolutely impossible if somebody ended with E=mc² formula and subbenly didn't have any thoughts about connection of mass with energy.
Poincaré, however, failed to connect E with the mass of any real body.
Fuck. Another one who doesn't understand the words they use. Impossible? What fuckin world do you live in? Improbable maybe but doubtful
"Recognize the other person is you." Yogi Bhajan