It's funny how much Russia fuels the talking points of the fascist right wing of the country.
Not OP, but I do have a question for you. Why do you intentionally misuse the word "I"?
Agreed. Awful, awful president.
Agreed. Trump was an awful president.
Any flat earthers care to take this one on?
It's okay to understand your cognitive deficiencies. Good on you!
Don't forget how Trump is a pedo.
Trump is surrounded by pedos.
I think the real answer is that Benedict Cumberbatch probably commands a massive fee to appear in films / shows at this point, and Marvel didn't want to spend 20% of their series budget on a single actor's cameo.
Trump cultists aren't the smartest bunch.
Sounds a bit like what happens here.
The incel vibe is strong with you, daddy.
No, she got her information from Trump-loving forums. Answered. Boom.
Its. It's is it is.
Or, you know, Trump loving forums.
Hush! All Republicans, regardless of murderer or pedo status, are good here!
Per mile squared is something like 64 inches per mile then. 172 over two miles. The curvature of the earth isn't 6 feet per mile, Jesus.
If each point was precisely measured and each point was exactly level on the topo, he could do this over 100 feet and would be proven wrong in his theory.
That guy's math is hilariously incorrect. There are so many things wrong with his example. First, the curvature of the Earth is not constant. We do not live on a perfect sphere. 2nd, the average rate of curvature is 7.98 inches per mile. No idea where he's getting 30-something inch discrepancy over two miles. If he said 16-18 inches, that would be more accurate.
If you look at his circle graph, you'll see point A is at about 12 o'clock and point B is close to 1 o'clock. At a circumference of 24,901 miles, if his experiment was around 2,000 miles long, that would be closer to the 10% or so he's representing on that circle. In reality, his point B would be somewhere closer to 12:00:00:02 o'clock.
This guy has a pretty interesting idea, but his math is so far off it's laughable.
He will certainly take down Trump with him.
Tl;dr: If we change the color of the photo, the colors change!
Quite the headline, but it doesn't match the content of the article. Harris didn't walk out. She wasn't scheduled to attend the entire meeting in the first place. The second is that the US is investing money in anti-corruption organizations in Mexico. Their president is pissed because he's corrupt and feels like we're giving his opposition ammunition, but he also stated in that very article that he doesn't believe the US is trying to force him out of office... so. Yeah, context is king, sensational headlines are not.