So, those of us who said it wasn't going to be a Black Death wave of deaths, but rather an excess mortality subtle kill off were correct. We have between a 50% to 85% increase in excess mortality in the 25-54 year old age range, males and females.
They don't fake mortality statistics, at least not yet. You can't hide the bodies. Insurance companies want answers. These guys have skin in the game. Billions of of dollars worth. Except more to trickle out. Full blame and culpability won't come until those responsible are in a nursing home or dead themselves.
"There is no visible effort to study the alarming statistics gathered by actuaries for the life insurance industry, which keeps track of deaths because they directly impact their bottom line through claims from the insured.....These deaths are not Wuhan flu deaths. However, the sudden rise of mortality from many other causes among the young in the third quarter of 2021, only a short time after the majority of the population had been given the COVID shots, is significant and strongly suggests the shots have something to do with this.
Link to actuarial report: https://www.soa.org/48ff80/globalassets/assets/files/resources/research-report/2022/group-life-covid-19-mortality.pdf
Look at table 5.6, page 23.
Here comes another round of the naysayers saying "Bitcoin is dead" for the 800th time." Stock market loses 27% and nobody says "The stock market is dead."
"One of the most notoriously known state legislators is a man named Vince Leach – he cosponsored National Popular Vote legislation to hand over Arizona’s sovereignty, voted to sine die as masks remained on children in schools, and cosponsored a bill to destroy the grassroots movement in the state party. Leach now finds himself in a primary race, against two fellow Republicans: Justine Wadsack and Robert Barr. All three candidates affirm they are strongly for the integrity of elections – after all, the vote is one of the most sacred rights of American citizens. However, only one candidate actually made it onto the ballot honestly: Justine Wadsack. Evidence presented in subsequent lawsuits show highly suspicious discrepancies, and outright violations of state statute.
Did this fact bother the men who obtained official candidacy by crooked means? Did they seek to right the wrong and remove themselves instead of profiting off of election fraud? "
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/05/what_is_going_on_with_arizona_republicans.html
You won't be able to do a color revolution for midterm elections just two years apart.
The left has used the courts for so many of their advances in the culture war (gay marriage, legalizing sodomy, contraception, CO2 as a pollutant, etc.) that they are putting judicial supremacy if they go at this to hard. They don't want to have the right start to ignore the courts like they did for Brown v Board of Ed.
Judicial supremacy is how in America, if everyone listens to the Supreme Court, since Amendments to overrule them are rare, the final say is the Supreme Court, even if the Court is weak in many ways (they have to rely on others to implement their decisions).
The whole system, left and right, relies upon people believing in the institutional legitimacy of courts, the Supreme Court in particular.
By "normie" I mean someone who maybe questions the 2020 election, or that thinks something fishy happened with JFK, but is not ready to accept the uncomfortable fact that democracy is an illusion and that global elites (sometimes together, sometimes in competition with each other) are trying to steer events, even if they sometimes fail, and even (yes it happens) the good guys win.
And don't say moon landing, flat earth, or 9/11 was a controlled demo...because those won't work.
I think the best one is the "military-industrial complex" which sounds like shit to a normie until you point out that Ike coined the phrase ,and framed the problem, in his farewell address.
In 1960, 60 years ago, the noted and eminent political scientist James Neustadt wrote the book "Presidential Power". A book of analytical history, the qualitative work from this book was so convincing in its conclusions, that it is still assigned today for anyone studying American government and the executive branch in particular. A second edition, with more data, is nothing but confirmatory. It's the "default" take on the American presidency for anybody looking past the so often wrong conventional wisdom that the American president is the most powerful man on the planet. So what are the conclusions?
The short version of the book is this: "Presidential power is the power to persuade."
That's it. For all the pomp and circumstance, the fancy jet and men with guns to protect him, the deferential treatment...even the ability to lob cruise missiles now and again, the president has very little actual power.
Presidents need to bargain to influence other branches of government who have their own agendas and base of power. Further, presidents, despite a theory of a unitary executive branch all working for the president as boss, must bargain to influence the executive branch bureaucracy.
Cabinet secretaries (often former primary opponents), agency heads who are career paper shufflers, all have leverage that they can use against the president (leaks, slow walking orders, outright defiance, among other things) and all these require presidents to persuade anyone who he wants to implement policies. Not to mention he has no power over courts, and he could have a backstabbing vice president. Historical examples abound of all these things, starting with George Washington.
So, whenever someone says that "oh, X president was in charge when Y happened" like that means that a man with a thousand demands upon his time handles every little squirrel that runs across the lawn, it shows that they don't know what they are talking about.
This is an hour and twenty minute podcast that give a great explanation, starting at a ground level, for those interesting in understanding the causes and results of inflation. The short version, is that it's always the government's fault, and it's caused by an expansion of the money supply - Jimmy Akin's Mysterious world: https://sqpn.com/2022/03/the-mystery-of-inflation-pocketbook-pain/
There are also those who say 2-3% inflation is a good thing, because we are a debtor society. The average rate of inflation for the past 100 years has been about 2.5%. Then again, what cost you $1 in 1921 would cost you $15.40 today, and that's not so good. The short version of this argument is that the interest rate should exceed the rate of inflation, but we have 2-3% interest rates and 8%+ inflation, which is not a good situation.
Here is a podcast where the man who came up with the "Taylor Rule" which, if it was followed by central banks, would at least give us stability and that 2-3% inflation rate. Econtalk interview of John Taylor: https://www.econtalk.org/john-taylor-on-inflation-the-fed-and-the-taylor-rule/
Finally here is the great website, Shadow States - Inflation calculated the old way before they removed energy and housing to hide the true extent of inflation...and it's closer to 15% http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/inflation-charts
It looks like the black WI driver who mowed people down in the parade was a criminal who worked alone who had anti-white propaganda push him over the edge.
The black NYC shooter may have worked alone (doesn't look like it). I think he was a mentally ill man who was pushed into it, like the Sandy Hook shooter.
No tit-for-tat attacks on blacks as of yet though. If there is one, fully expect the full weight of the system to give the Alex Jones treatment to the race realists (or outright racists) over at VDare and American Renaissance and conpro.win and lots of other sites/commentators. Even normie(ish) conservatives are making 13/52 comments these days, like Mark Dice, and race realism has gone mainstream.
My hypothesis is they are trying to prompt a retaliatory attack, but one that won't fall apart under scrutiny like Jan 6th Reichstag Fire or the MI gov kidnapping entrapment.
Of course, I really can't test this hypothesis, so it's more of a theory really.
Four men faced life in prison for what amounts to FBI election interference. People wonder why so many of us don't trust the government.
"...the jury instead seemed to believe defense attorneys’ arguments that their clients were entrapped by the FBI. At least a dozen FBI undercover agents and informants, working out of numerous FBI field offices across the eastern half of the country and at the direction of supervising agents, concocted and funded the sting operation. Dan Chappel, the main informant compensated at least $60,000 by the FBI for “bringing people together,” as his FBI handler ordered him, took the stand to explain his role. But his testimony was lackluster and ultimately did not convince the jury the men were guilty."
https://amgreatness.com/2022/04/09/fbi-kidnapping-caper-was-flagrant-election-interference/
The key take away for me, here, is that if you intend to organize, keep your circle small. There WILL be informants regardless. Happens every time.
[snip]
Rep. Madison Cawthorn revealed last week that since moving to Washington, D.C., he has been invited to orgies with politicians and saw powerful people do “key bumps” of cocaine in front of him, all while the media collected scandalous stories to blackmail people.
Speaking to John Lovell on the Warrior Poet Society podcast, Cawthorn was asked if House of Cards, the show starring Kevin Spacey as the Democratic chief whip and his “secret life of corruption and power and money and perversion,” was anything to close to the reality of what goes on in Washington DC.
Cawthorn said he was astonished at the levels of “sexual perversion” that happen in the nation’s capital.
[snip]
This guy's House webpage.....
While the pictures of Michelle Obama as trans are one thing, and certainly strong evidence that she's ugly as fuck and maybe a man, where did the kids come from? Adopted?
I'm sure somebody has looked into this as hard (pun intended) as the fake Hawaii birth certificate. I would like to know more.
Let's face it, Americans are fat, and we waste an enormous amount of food. Further, if food prices did go way up, people in the West would respond by cutting back on expensive foods and wasting less. Also, people would reallocate their money from unnecessary items to necessary items to pay for food (a necessity) if prices got high enough. And because, compared to the rest of the world, the developed world can pay higher prices, the food that does exist will be allocated via prices to those whom can pay for it.
But what about Sub-Saharan Africa? Or places in South America? What about places where people are already marginally getting by with little money to spare and who are NOT fat and who do NOT waste food? Ah. Well there you have it. If you're making $20 a day doing shitty jobs in thirdworldistan, and suddenly your rice and beans triple in price, you're going to go hungry. Civilization is only a few missed meals away from anarchy.
So, just like the "crises" in Libya and Syria that got Europe inundated with "refugees" from Africa and the Middle East, and the United States is perpetually flooded with the brown peoples from beyond its southern border, the hungry hordes will start coming again. And you, you racist bigot that worries about the Great Replacement, you'd be a heartless bastard to keep them from being your new neighbor.
Big money, they kind that's to big to fail in other words, has bought into crypto. It's being co-opted. It still has advantages, in that it is "free speech money", for now at least.
BTW, the big exchanges have been co-opted for years, by handing over your data to the IRS.
Interesting shift in the anti-crypto arguments. It's like they forgot they said it was all a ponzi scheme for suckers and worthless and you should buy muh gold and AR-15s. Funny, because anybody with any sense diversifies and has gold/silver/guns/food AND crypto.
And no, I'm not referring to any one person in particular.
Don’t ever listen to a person bitch about gerrymandered districts. You see, they are regurgitating arguments they don’t understand. They think that competitive elections are good for democracy. They won’t say why though.
Thing is, when a House seat is gerrymandered so it is a solid +10 or so Dem or GOP, it takes a wave election to displace the otherwise safe incumbent. A “competitive” House seat, where the voting is about 50/50 between the two major parties, means that it just gives one side a bigger incentive to cheat. All it takes in a swing district is a 1% advantage in (phony) or harvested mail-in ballots to give victory to the cheater. One side tends to cheat more than the other, and we all know which party that is.
The only truly competitive elections are in suburban areas where the County Clerks are Republican. There are only about 30 of these in the whole country. If any portion of the district is in an inner city Democrat controlled area, well, then it's not a competitive district as the inner city precincts make it non-competitive.
Lastly, the Senate, which is not gerrymandered, is just as partisan and divided as the House. Entire states cannot be gerrymandered! So if somebody is complaining that gerrymandered House seats contribute to partisan rancor because "moderates" don't get elected due there being so few competitive House seats, point him to that institution called the Senate, and tell him to fuck off.
So a reptile at the WEF is talking about using big data to hack the human organism for (presumably) eugenic purposes: https://youtu.be/6G3nWyoQ5CQ?t=205 (link goes to relevant timestamp of a JP Sears video)
If you're going to do that, why say it in the context of talking about human dictatorships? Like you want to make more controllable humans like a Huxley dystopia? Total turn off for the average Joe.
You could easily get buy-in from a large swath of humanity by telling them that if you take X product it will, on average, make your kid Y points higher on the IQ scale, or alternately, choose several attributes that people are going to select mates for (height, strength, constitution, etc.).
In ten year's time, you'd have tons of people saying "we chose the X injection for Mary when we decided to have kids. We are more likely to have a kid with a high verbal IQ. This translates to musical talent, they say, so we are definitely getting the kid violin lessons early. opens present Thanks for coming to our baby shower. What a lovely Tiffany bracelet! Dear, isn't it lovely? Dear? Fred, I'm talking to you, come away from your Uncle Ted, you know when he starts spouting off about 'big pharma' it's all nonsense."