6
MO-Carpenter 6 points ago +6 / -0

It was a bullshit larp that wasn’t made by John McAffee or his wife. Was made by some asshole who types just like the Q larp, and was an obvious fake.

Nothing came of it because it was bullshit.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

The image is unreadable, way too pixelated.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

and that EchoHealth stated in 2018 HCQ was effective against coronaviruses in its funding

This EchoHealth data would have been available to NIH and Dr Fauci EchoHealth's final Wuhan funder

I agree with you that hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are helpful, but ecohealth alone isn’t sufficient weight to pull the entire government to this conclusion. It’s proof of a dissent in opinions, but not proof of much beyond that. Ecohealth alliance is not the arbiter of truth for DARPA or the us government, nor would we want them to be fully. It’s the same problem as the Wuhan Lab doing covid fact checking. It’s a unreliable source with a vested interest. It’s important information and it’s indicative of more investigation but it itself isn’t sufficient to say that the whole government knew and agreed upon anything. It’s a company saying something at the end of the day. It’s a company saying stuff I agree with, but if I operated on just what companies said, I’d be a Pfizer pincushion. So I don’t roll that way.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

2018 HCQ was indentified by Ecohealth

The opinion of one government contractor versus the opinion of the government.

The same goes for the coronavirus bat vaccine to be developed at Wuhan set out in the EchoHealth

The opinion of one government contractor versus the opinion of the government.

I agree that it’s harmful and that eco health is clearly at least partially responsible, but they are not the entire federal government.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

This confirms that I was just in a bubble of Christians attempting to differentiate the two. So some people in Texas do it that way, but the “correct way” seems to be exactly what you’re showing here. Culture is weird sometimes.

1
MO-Carpenter 1 point ago +1 / -0

I used to live in Texas, I saw a lot of people do the horns slightly differently, using the fingertips of the ring and middle finger meeting the tip of your thumb. Emulating the longhorns mouth and head shape more effectively while also differentiating in a primarily Christian area between the “devil horns” and Texas Longhorns. When I google images I see many many graphics depicting the devil horns. I haven’t lived in Texas for ten years. I’m not super into football so can anyone verify that this is a thing?

2
MO-Carpenter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds kinda like here

4
MO-Carpenter 4 points ago +4 / -0

I wholeheartedly agree. I don’t think he’s the definitive word on the demonic by any stretch but I find Aleister Crowley to be quite illuminating on the mind of humans influenced by evil. Here’s what he said that lines up with what you’re saying.

“For the highest spiritual working one must accordingly choose that victim which contains the greatest and purest force. A male child of perfect innocence and high intelligence[8] is the most satisfactory and suitable victim.” Link https://www.thelemistas.org/en/Documents/Crowley/MTP/mtp_12

But the bloody sacrifice, though more dangerous, is more efficacious; and for nearly all purposes human sacrifice is the best. The truly great Magician will be able to use his own blood, or possibly that of a disciple, and that without sacrificing the physical life irrevocably.[10] An example of this sacrifice is given in Chapter 44[11] of Liber 333. This Mass may be recommended generally for daily practice.

2
MO-Carpenter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Murder is forbidden biblically and almost everywhere with laws, it still happens. People don’t always obey commandments, rules, or laws. What’s your point?

5
MO-Carpenter 5 points ago +5 / -0

Which concluded blood sacrifice, human sacrifice permanently for adherents. The blood and body of Christ as sacraments of wine and bread also allude to this.

For the Christian community, animal sacrifices stopped with the death and resurrection of Christ. There were some who were persecuted or pressured by the Jewish community to continue to offer sacrifices either because they rejected Jesus or felt his death was not enough. The book of Hebrews actually deals with this and shows that the Old Testament sacrificial system (the Old Covenant) was temporary until the coming of Christ who was the fulfillment of all that the sacrificial system anticipated. Paul teaches us the same thing in passages like Colossians 2:16f. It was Paul who specifically pointed to Christ as our Passover who was sacrificed for us (see 1 Corinthians 5:7). In keeping with the Lord’s Supper, instituted just before His death, Jesus also celebrated what was actually the last legitimate Passover by which He also pointed to Himself as the sacrifice for our sin.

So Abraham was a treatise against human sacrifice, and the Lord gave the ultimate sacrifice which fully sealed the practice out of Christianity. When you hear Jesus died for your sins it’s implying that you don’t need to kill yourself, animals, or other humans to get salvation. The Lord picked up the check, paid the bill, and nobody else needs to try and “pay” in that way anymore.

3
MO-Carpenter 3 points ago +3 / -0

What are the odds that it’s vaccine aids?

10
MO-Carpenter 10 points ago +10 / -0

Abraham was a treatise against human sacrifice which was the norm at the time. Which makes it a very bold and progressive move for its day.

by pkvi
6
MO-Carpenter 6 points ago +6 / -0

My reading of this is that it’s “more effective” during the first 180 days than after. As in it doesn’t last.

3
MO-Carpenter 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s like the waiter saying enjoy your meal, “thanks you too” just fucking cracks me up more than the meek pronoun policing.

2
MO-Carpenter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nobody thought of using courts until some asshole named cliff sounds plausible and not a stretch at all

2
MO-Carpenter 2 points ago +2 / -0

You say that but your entire account is made about Jews

3
MO-Carpenter 3 points ago +3 / -0

As with most things, you absolutely can without it, it just requires standing up for yourself, but if you want your financiers to be happy you put on the cap.

2
MO-Carpenter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seems fake and gay to me.

4
MO-Carpenter 4 points ago +4 / -0

The days are in “reverse” to your perception because before creation there was darkness, think about nothingness then “let there be light”. Make sense?

A boat can move upon the face of the water but you’re seriously concerned about how the Lord hovered, moved, or brooded over the water of the earth?

You can’t answer how or why the Big Bang happened, the best scientific guess for the building blocks of life on earth is directed panspermia, aka aliens, God(s), or we don’t know. Simulation theory is becoming popularized because of how ordered and created our universe appears. Darwinian theory is struggling as well. Your science has a lot of faith in it as well. You are following a religious doctrine and you weren’t even aware of it.

2
MO-Carpenter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah the word fuck didn’t exist as an English word until around 1310 or something. Swearing is about how your word should be enough, if you promise to do something do it, honor your word, don’t try and get the Lord involved to make people trust your word more, just be good enough on your own. It’s an encouragement to be honorable and trustworthy.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›