Soldiers dying of dysentery during a siege is normal, stupid. They had no salt.
I knew you would go there and that's why I added the second quote where the caution is particularly about consuming fat - not salt or carbs. Dysentery has nothing to do with salt nor does diarrhea. Lack of salt can cause cramps, vomiting and nausea, not diarrhea.
I'm well aware. This method does not work with scallops, which have less than half the fat of shrimp.
Where do you get that info from? I've checked it and scallops contain about 0.6g fats in a 100g serving while shrimp is half that.
Yes, you added a quote about rabbit starvation to a scenario where it did not apply, stupidly.
Dysentery is normal during a siege with suboptimal nutrition and sanitation. It kills especially quickly without salt. I do not recommend trying ultra-low fat with terrestrial protein sources anyway, so the scenario is irrelevant. Saltwater shrimp fat can be safely consumed after light cooking, and is one of the most healthy complete fat sources available today.
you> Dysentery has nothing to do with salt nor does diarrhea.
Another spectacularly stupid statement that can get you killed. See oral rehydration salts.
While both foods are low-fat, shrimp contains over two times more fat. Shrimp provide less than 2g of fat per 100g serving. Shrimp also have a fat profile that is preferable to scallops, which contain predominantly polyunsaturated fats, such as omega-3 fatty acids.
– Shrimp vs. Scallop | FoodStruct
I will check agains the FDA: shrimp is 1.7% fat; scallops has .49%. So I understated the ratio; shrimp has 3.5x more (and better) fat than scallops.
My method of cooking loses no fat; grilled shrimp would not work. I avoid farm-raised shrimp, whose fat is much lower-quality. The worse the ingredients, the more food one needs.
you> Dysentery has nothing to do with salt nor does diarrhea. Another spectacularly stupid statement that can get you killed. See oral rehydration salts.
What kind of inverted logic and strawmaning is that? One loses salts and electrolytes through diarrhea of course and lack of salt is dangerous. But it doesn't follow that lack of salts leads to diarrhea. You can't switch cause for effect like that, it's nonsensical. Diarrhea is not a symptom of a salt deficient diet.
So it's half, I was looking at cooked macros before. Still, with 70g of shrimp you get 0.7g of fats from it and together with the rice that's like 1g of fat per day. Even with the best quality and nutritional value you can't get much higher. Again, an adult needs more than 10 times that. This is not sustainable.
The cause of dysentery is usually the bacteria from genus Shigella, in which case it is known as shigellosis, or the amoeba Entamoeba histolytica; then it is called amoebiasis.[1] Other causes may include certain chemicals, other bacteria, other protozoa, or parasitic worms.[2] It may spread between people.[4] Risk factors include contamination of food and water with feces due to poor sanitation.[5]
– Dysentery | Wikipedia
So it's half
No, more than.
Again, an adult needs more than 10 times that. This is not sustainable.
Another naked assertion, conveniently without any specific falsifiable prediction. Because you know you don't know what you're talking about.
I'm well aware. This method does not work with scallops, which have less than half the fat of shrimp.
I've been doing this for years and don't require saving from your ignorance, which would leave me still sick.
Soldiers dying of dysentery during a siege is normal, stupid. They had no salt.
The second quote is about rabbit starvation, which you are still too stupid to comprehend is caused by a no-carb carnivore diet.
The diet does not cause diarrhea; it stops it. That is the whole reason I use it.
Basically, the opposition to this diet is coming from dogmatic midwits who can't reason their way out of a wet paper bag.
I knew you would go there and that's why I added the second quote where the caution is particularly about consuming fat - not salt or carbs. Dysentery has nothing to do with salt nor does diarrhea. Lack of salt can cause cramps, vomiting and nausea, not diarrhea.
Where do you get that info from? I've checked it and scallops contain about 0.6g fats in a 100g serving while shrimp is half that.
Yes, you added a quote about rabbit starvation to a scenario where it did not apply, stupidly.
Dysentery is normal during a siege with suboptimal nutrition and sanitation. It kills especially quickly without salt. I do not recommend trying ultra-low fat with terrestrial protein sources anyway, so the scenario is irrelevant. Saltwater shrimp fat can be safely consumed after light cooking, and is one of the most healthy complete fat sources available today.
you> Dysentery has nothing to do with salt nor does diarrhea.
Another spectacularly stupid statement that can get you killed. See oral rehydration salts.
I will check agains the FDA: shrimp is 1.7% fat; scallops has .49%. So I understated the ratio; shrimp has 3.5x more (and better) fat than scallops.
Hm, there is considerable variance here though:
My method of cooking loses no fat; grilled shrimp would not work. I avoid farm-raised shrimp, whose fat is much lower-quality. The worse the ingredients, the more food one needs.
What kind of inverted logic and strawmaning is that? One loses salts and electrolytes through diarrhea of course and lack of salt is dangerous. But it doesn't follow that lack of salts leads to diarrhea. You can't switch cause for effect like that, it's nonsensical. Diarrhea is not a symptom of a salt deficient diet.
Raw scallops: 0.5g/100g https://www.nutritionix.com/food/raw-scallops
Raw shrimp: 1g/100g https://www.nutritionix.com/food/raw-shrimp
So it's half, I was looking at cooked macros before. Still, with 70g of shrimp you get 0.7g of fats from it and together with the rice that's like 1g of fat per day. Even with the best quality and nutritional value you can't get much higher. Again, an adult needs more than 10 times that. This is not sustainable.
you> But it doesn't follow that lack of salts leads to diarrhea. You can't switch cause for effect like that, it's nonsensical.
Sieges cause dysentery, moron.
No, more than.
Another naked assertion, conveniently without any specific falsifiable prediction. Because you know you don't know what you're talking about.