My 6s is now 5 years old and can still take the latest iOS. Hard to complain about that.
FFS, there is no evidence for this slander. Downvoted.
China supports Antifa, BLM, and the Biden family with money, but didn't interfere in the election? What bullshit.
Eh, I don't think that's really true. Newer versions of iOS have higher power demands, so they make tweaks to give older hardware longer battery life. There are always trade-offs.
I’m not the sort who thinks everything is a false flag, but this stinks.
Nothing happened.
The Radar Online link is now gone, but there's still this: https://clarion.causeaction.com/2021/03/05/bill-clinton-bagman-doug-band-provides-evidence-to-feds-investigating-ties-to-epstein-madam-ghislaine-maxwell/
The timing is certainly suspicious. I think it went something like this. Many Democrats were shocked when Trump won in 2016, and they vowed to do anything they could to stop him. It wasn't getting a "memo," but lots of different people wanted to "stop the new Hitler" and "knew what they had to do." A lot of little nudges and winks were exchanged, between bigwigs in private and between bosses and employees. Places that had any pro-Trump sentiment were targeted. A lot of effort went into suppressing some ideas and pushing approved narratives, including making Biden and Harris look vastly more popular than they really are. Then the DNC "plumbers" did their dirty work.
We know from Biden's actions during the Obama administration that one meaning is "graft."
I am trying to fight, in my own way. Making memes like this is minor, but counts as something, I think.
"You hate Jews and America? Let's ignore your terror attacks and give you 'humanitarian aid' because your terrorist leaders say they really, really need it." WTF is going on?
Because that's not a common opinion on the left, as far as I know.
Wait, that Cynthia McKinney thinks Biden stole the election...?
I've also read that it's the other way around, that the military is close to the CCP.
He's now doing a $40 million redevelopment after the riots. https://www.startribune.com/somali-mall-walgreens-burned-in-minneapolis-riots-set-for-40m-redevelopment/573343331/
Now that the Swamp is back in control, they need to secure their position by labeling all their opponents as Bad People. Regular people on Reddit etc. are now dangerous and deluded conspiracy theorists, white supremacists, agents of Russia (but oddly, never China). The same people who cheered on BLM/Antifa riots are now lecturing us on the dangers of populism and rabble-rousing. Frankly, I think they are pushing hard because they want some right-wing nuts to start shooting or bombing, because then they'll have an excuse for a major crackdown: gut the 1st and 2nd Amendments, assign a sort of social credit score to all conservatives/Republicans/dissidents, and a lot more.
The collapse of the two towers was equivalent to an earthquake. It severely damaged WTC7.
But my main argument against "controlled demolition" is logic. If someone was going to use explosives to take down the buildings and blame terrorists, why not just do that? They'd already tried it once before, in 1991. Just blowing up the buildings with no warnings would have meant far more casualties. Adding hijacked airliners makes no sense because the hijackings might not succeed (Flight 93) or might not hit their intended target (Flight 77). The hijacking would have been an extra complication with a great risk of failure, and as we saw, half of them did fail.
It's easier than that. All you need are politicians-bureaucrats to give nods and winks to the corporations who are on the same leftist ideology. You don't need to start corporations, pay them, or give them legal orders. They all already understand that traditional America is the real threat and impediment to the glorious Woke utopia they want.
There is at least one uncucked sub still there: r/fucktheccp. Check it out.
I keep encountering weird banning and shadowbanning on Reddit. Posts in new some big subs get auto-removed but I can never get mods to say why. I think I'm on some big blacklist for having posted in The_Donald, but none of the cowards will just admit it.
Maybe we need a politicalhumor.win, where it can be uncucked.
Back in the late '80s/early '90s, they tried to convince people that AIDS was not just a gay/drug user thing, but equally a threat to heterosexuals. That was not true: It's not that heterosexuals can't get it, it's just that it's much harder. See the book The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS, which turned out to be correct.
I was about to post this. What a farce!
Nice. Hey mods, use this.
I'll be posting a GIF of this from two angles.