- Minimize the damage: They are mutant proteins which would eventually get removed from system naturally by T cells. Antioxidants can help boost this.
- Maximize healing: mutant proteins will damage the host’s tissue so repairing is also necessary. Protein supplements can help boost this.
The NFTs will be used to establish criteria for recognizing compliant devices. Only compliant devices will be able to use big tech. They’ll purposefully acquire NFTs to force political opponent’s devices to be out of compliance.
I see evidence based theories supporting both concerns about sterilization and about immunodeficiency. Not that it has to be either/or though I suspect they’d have optimized for one not both. Anyone have any clarity here?
Thinking less copyright protection and more techno facism.
It’s Nov. 16th, 2031. Top headline on metaverse for the day flashes into your awareness on your brain implant. Former political aide is brought up on charges for possessing and distributing content restricted by NFT contracts.
I’ve been following this rabbit hole a bit and i think i figured something out. It might be about “compliance after the fact”. Something you downloaded now belongs to someone else. In order to verify compliance you must subject your device to audit check. All devices must be in compliance to use big tech. Therefore all must install this malware. Etc
Might have been me I’ve definitely suggested this in the past. We know for example that smallpox had a role in activating idle HIV causing AIDs in the 80s.
Another thing it might be is: “hey this virus great thing helped other pharma companies make billions more it’s our turn “