-1
KarlMartell -1 points ago +1 / -2

I'm sure you can provide some well-sourced numbers.

Why do I have the feeling that you won't?

-2
KarlMartell -2 points ago +2 / -4

"Pizzagate is real but only if the people I hate are implicated."

He's a fucking pedo-rapist enabler.

-1
KarlMartell -1 points ago +2 / -3

At that rate it will only take a couple of million years until all the vaxxedd people are dead. They really plan long term.

0
KarlMartell 0 points ago +1 / -1

Do you think that losing 500 soldiers on New Year in one go was part of the plan?

0
KarlMartell 0 points ago +1 / -1

But there’s nothing to protect. You said so yourself.

I never said that you fucking liar.

-1
KarlMartell -1 points ago +1 / -2

Not a valid question. If they don’t plan it, why are they expanding NATO to Finland?

To protect Finland from Russia you fucking cretin. Russia has invaded Finland in the past and recently threatened it.

Zero evidence for this claim.

https://countryeconomy.com/countries/groups/nato

Now show me Russia.

-1
KarlMartell -1 points ago +1 / -2

Cool, so NATO presents no threat and your entire argument is meaningless. What was that about not thinking?

Why the fuck would NATO want to invade Russia via Finland? Fucking retard.

Why? NATO can’t afford it.

NATO can easily afford it.

-1
KarlMartell -1 points ago +1 / -2

USA is over 20 trillion dollars in debt.

So you think a few billion extra will bankrupt them?

The war between Finland and Russia would be over in two hours, and Russia would be the clear winner. Finland has only a tiny & pathetic military with mostly old & obsolete weapons.

The war between Ukraine and Russia would be over in two hours, and Russia would be the clear winner. Ukraine has only a tiny & pathetic military with mostly old & obsolete weapons.

If Russia attacks a NATO country, it will be annihilated.

Russia can do that much more cheaply than the USA.

No they can't. You are delusional.

Russia is clear winner of Ukraine war even against 30 NATO countries + Ukraine.

You have a very strange definition of "winning". What exactly have they won so far?

-3
KarlMartell -3 points ago +1 / -4

Easily. Russia is one of the most resource richest countries in the world.

So is the US. Again, did you think your argument through?

Not as much as the USA and most of the military infrastructure already exists on the Russian side of the border.

No it doesn't you fucking ignorant retard. That is the problem Russia has. That border is not fortified at all.

There are few roads from Russia to Finland and the landscape is swamps, lakes, and forests. How would Russia even invade Finland?

Again, you have no fucking idea what you are talking about.

Finland is not a threat to Russia because Finland

Exactly and that's why Russia never militarized the border. That is why Russia now has to spend big time to do so and Ukraine has shown us that the most modern Russian equipment can be easily defeated by Cold War surplus from NATO. What do you think modern NATO gear will do with Russia?

Russia is done for. They have shown that their military is decades behind NATO. They will never catch up.

0
KarlMartell 0 points ago +2 / -2

2 more weeks!

0
KarlMartell 0 points ago +3 / -3

So how will that work out for Russia? Will they leave the border defenseless?

Having NATO in Finland is a massive problem for Russia because it will leave the only highway to Murmansk in striking range. Do you know know how important Murmansk is?

It will also leave St Petersburg vulnerable.

Did you even think that argument through before making it?

Having Sweden and Finland in NATO is a worst-case scenario for Russia. They will have to massively build up their military presence. How will they pay for that?

NATO already ruined the Soviet Union by outspending it on the military, they will easily do the same with Russia.

1
KarlMartell 1 point ago +2 / -1

Why do you even read The Sun?

-2
KarlMartell -2 points ago +2 / -4

HAHAHAHAHA

oh lordy

toppest of keks

"Everything is going according to plan", right?

How fucking delusional are you Russkie shills?

-1
KarlMartell -1 points ago +2 / -3

That's only the expected expenses upfront to make Finland's defenses follow NATO standards but after that the USA is also forced to fund Finnish & Swedish defenses every year with billions of dollars.

Yes. Again, pocket change.

Russia is trying to bankrupt the USA by forcing Americans pay too much on defense of itself & its allies.

So Russia started a war that is right now bankrupting it, is killing tens of thousands of its citizens and destroying its military because they think that spending a couple of billion extra will bankrupt the USA?

How fucking stupid are they?

0
KarlMartell 0 points ago +3 / -3

That's pocket change for NATO.

This is the dumbest cope I have seen from Russian shills so far.

Russia has for years complained about NATO expanding towards Russia's borders and now you claim that they planned to have NATO expand to Russia's borders?

Fucking retarded.

0
KarlMartell 0 points ago +1 / -1

You really have no idea what this conversation is about, do you?

0
KarlMartell 0 points ago +1 / -1

That is how these words are used, yes. That's not my opinion., It's a fact.

How fucking retarded are you? Are you trying some kind of "gotcha" move here?

The words used in the report have a very specific meaning and that is how they are used. Feel free to google them and tell me if anyone uses it in the context of "side effects".

0
KarlMartell 0 points ago +1 / -1

That's the best you can do after I exposed your ignorance?

Pathetic.

0
KarlMartell 0 points ago +1 / -1

That's not my opinion. Words have meaning and these words are clearly defined.

0
KarlMartell 0 points ago +1 / -1

Side effect is confirmed.

Adverse event is a potential side effect but not cofirmed.

It's so fucking funny to get proven how antivaxxers have no fucking idea what they are talking about.

Proof: this thread.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›