Yes. Soon Finland and Sweden are NATO members and the USA is forced to spend billions to defend these two parasites. Finland has over 1000 kilometers long defenseless border with Russia which requires a massive amount of American troops to protect it. I wonder if 100,000 American troops are enough to protect that new border?
So how will that work out for Russia? Will they leave the border defenseless?
Having NATO in Finland is a massive problem for Russia because it will leave the only highway to Murmansk in striking range. Do you know know how important Murmansk is?
It will also leave St Petersburg vulnerable.
Did you even think that argument through before making it?
Having Sweden and Finland in NATO is a worst-case scenario for Russia. They will have to massively build up their military presence. How will they pay for that?
NATO already ruined the Soviet Union by outspending it on the military, they will easily do the same with Russia.
Did you even think that argument through before making it?
Yes. But you, being paid to post lies here in support of the gay rape of children, didn’t. How does a bankrupt military engage in military actions, dipshit? Nothing is in range of anything else when you can’t afford to attack it. Nothing is vulnerable.
Easily. Russia is one of the most resource richest countries in the world.
They will have to massively build up their military presence. How will they pay for that?
Not as much as the USA and most of the military infrastructure already exists on the Russian side of the border.
Having NATO in Finland is a massive problem for Russia
Finland is not a threat to Russia because Finland has only a very tiny & pathetic military which means the USA is forced to have a massive military presence in Finland which will cost a lot of money for the USA and the USA is also forced to spend billions to build up new military infrastructure in Finland. It's a bigger problem for the USA than Russia.
Easily. Russia is one of the most resource richest countries in the world.
So is the US. Again, did you think your argument through?
Not as much as the USA and most of the military infrastructure already exists on the Russian side of the border.
No it doesn't you fucking ignorant retard. That is the problem Russia has. That border is not fortified at all.
There are few roads from Russia to Finland and the landscape is swamps, lakes, and forests. How would Russia even invade Finland?
Again, you have no fucking idea what you are talking about.
Finland is not a threat to Russia because Finland
Exactly and that's why Russia never militarized the border. That is why Russia now has to spend big time to do so and Ukraine has shown us that the most modern Russian equipment can be easily defeated by Cold War surplus from NATO. What do you think modern NATO gear will do with Russia?
Russia is done for. They have shown that their military is decades behind NATO. They will never catch up.
HAHAHAHAHA
oh lordy
toppest of keks
"Everything is going according to plan", right?
How fucking delusional are you Russkie shills?
Off yourself, NATO shill. We will never support the gay rape of children.
Only the gay rape of conscripts, right?
You mean what Ukraine did to POWs?
Yes. Soon Finland and Sweden are NATO members and the USA is forced to spend billions to defend these two parasites. Finland has over 1000 kilometers long defenseless border with Russia which requires a massive amount of American troops to protect it. I wonder if 100,000 American troops are enough to protect that new border?
So how will that work out for Russia? Will they leave the border defenseless?
Having NATO in Finland is a massive problem for Russia because it will leave the only highway to Murmansk in striking range. Do you know know how important Murmansk is?
It will also leave St Petersburg vulnerable.
Did you even think that argument through before making it?
Having Sweden and Finland in NATO is a worst-case scenario for Russia. They will have to massively build up their military presence. How will they pay for that?
NATO already ruined the Soviet Union by outspending it on the military, they will easily do the same with Russia.
Yes. But you, being paid to post lies here in support of the gay rape of children, didn’t. How does a bankrupt military engage in military actions, dipshit? Nothing is in range of anything else when you can’t afford to attack it. Nothing is vulnerable.
Easily. Russia is one of the most resource richest countries in the world.
Not as much as the USA and most of the military infrastructure already exists on the Russian side of the border.
Finland is not a threat to Russia because Finland has only a very tiny & pathetic military which means the USA is forced to have a massive military presence in Finland which will cost a lot of money for the USA and the USA is also forced to spend billions to build up new military infrastructure in Finland. It's a bigger problem for the USA than Russia.
So is the US. Again, did you think your argument through?
No it doesn't you fucking ignorant retard. That is the problem Russia has. That border is not fortified at all.
There are few roads from Russia to Finland and the landscape is swamps, lakes, and forests. How would Russia even invade Finland?
Again, you have no fucking idea what you are talking about.
Exactly and that's why Russia never militarized the border. That is why Russia now has to spend big time to do so and Ukraine has shown us that the most modern Russian equipment can be easily defeated by Cold War surplus from NATO. What do you think modern NATO gear will do with Russia?
Russia is done for. They have shown that their military is decades behind NATO. They will never catch up.