1
Hate4_Zetetics 1 point ago +1 / -0

People can only learn for themselves if they question the known. Like, we can't be on a globe because easy and obvious observation that people won't look at, but it's right out in the open

1
Hate4_Zetetics 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, reddit isn't figuring it out, just like everywhere

2
Hate4_Zetetics 2 points ago +2 / -0

No matter how obvious it gets....

1
Hate4_Zetetics 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can't draw curve and show you, and I don't think you grasp what I explained.

https://streamable.com/jq0wbv

I searched and found this for ya, it's not great. She's actually a MENSA 1% 'er

1
Hate4_Zetetics 1 point ago +1 / -0

Assume exact coordinates and they know.

And no, I don't assume they are on a globe, like you assume.

It works, it's triangles and math. You can't deny if you don't understand

1
Hate4_Zetetics 1 point ago +1 / -0

And this is why you believe if anyone says we aren't in space, or on a planet, is immediately labeled a stupid flat earther. A lod of FE content is false leads, especially speculation and bible as history talk. It's to hide the truth whis is in plane sight

1
Hate4_Zetetics 1 point ago +1 / -0

Triangles. It's just trig.

You need two people, across an ocean from eachother will do.

Simultaneously, Each person takes a angle measurements to the sun. From that, you have two angles. And then you also have the distance between the two people. So, soa coa toa, you can you can find the other two lengths to the sun, because that's how triangles work. At your halfway distance between you and the other person, you have a 90 degree triangle, and then you can calculate the height to the sun.

It's not gonna work on a globe model, because you don't have convergence, you can't witness the sun at the angles simultaneously.

You follow?

1
Hate4_Zetetics 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok. Good. I do same sometimes. Normal

1
Hate4_Zetetics 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's a test to see how stupid you are to stay on Reddit

1
Hate4_Zetetics 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's always spacetarded. It's a dead giveaway to anything wrong.

3
Hate4_Zetetics 3 points ago +3 / -0

Space is what we can see. We can determine without doubt (Aireys failure) that the stars move, not us, thus, to move that fast (celestial day) they have little or no mass. They are far away, but not light years or something even like that. More like thousands of miles.

It is not Galaxy or planets and mega fusion bombs. Black holes, all that shit is visible, but it's not that far away. This, it's not what they tell you it is, it's something else. What exactly? I don't know. But it's not Galaxies of planets

2
Hate4_Zetetics 2 points ago +2 / -0

😂 don't make it too obvious

1
Hate4_Zetetics 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gullible space tard shit with Jesus mania mixed in.

2
Hate4_Zetetics 2 points ago +2 / -0

One-sentence summaries:

Layman: Taylor's Scientific Management made factories run smoother but treated workers like robots.

Scientist: Taylor's Scientific Management optimized industrial efficiency through empirical studies but neglected the human and psychological aspects of labor.

200-word summary:

Frederick Taylor’s Scientific Management aimed to maximize industrial efficiency by applying empirical research to streamline processes and motivate workers through financial incentives. Taylor’s work at Midvale Steel and Bethlehem Steel, including experiments on optimal tool sizes and piece-rate pay systems, reduced labor costs and increased productivity. However, while his methods enhanced efficiency and profit, they drew criticism for disregarding workers' autonomy and well-being. Workers felt dehumanized, treated as mere extensions of machines, which fueled dissatisfaction and conflict.

Critics argued that Taylor’s rigid, mechanistic approach suited unskilled labor but clashed with the aspirations of a more educated workforce emerging by the mid-20th century. His refusal to consider workers’ psychological needs, emphasizing profit over human factors, limited the longevity and applicability of his theories. Taylorism catalyzed the shift toward more human-centric management practices, highlighting its significant but problematic legacy.

3 Main Points:

  1. Efficiency Optimization: Taylor focused on maximizing productivity through detailed task analysis.

  2. Piece-Rate Incentives: Introduced tiered pay to encourage higher output, sparking both success and resentment.

  3. Worker Dehumanization: Methods reduced workers' autonomy, sparking criticism and discontent.

7 Things Wrong with the Paper:

  1. Overstates Taylor's originality, ignoring predecessors' similar studies.

  2. Downplays negative effects on workers’ mental health.

  3. Lacks depth in describing Taylorism’s long-term societal impact.

  4. Insufficient critique of class conflicts exacerbated by Taylorism.

  5. Ignores contemporary challenges to Taylor's methods.

  6. Overlooks the shift to human-focused management solutions.

  7. Underexplores criticisms of Taylor’s disregard for job satisfaction and autonomy.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›