He has swallowed Democrat/Leftist/Woke thinking whole, apparently. He went full bluepill!
It is a false belief set. That's what.
everything is communism!!!!
That schtick is just like those people who claim that all animals are transitional forms and thus "proof of evolution". That absolutely every single change in genes is "evolution".
"Let's dilute the meaning of this word so that everything looks like it falls under this word."
Okay, let's try an experiment. Go to the most crazy-looking muslim you can find and say "I love you and want you to live. Jesus Saves" to them.
an excuse to prevent research
Not my position.
In 60s weak 1mW red HeNe laser cost thousands and was a laboratory equipment that perceived like SciFi or magic. Today 10mW red semiconductor laser cost cents and is a toy.
Which consumes power. Generating it is a WHOLE DIFFERENT ANIMAL.
RITEGs
How big are they? I'm thinking of a little battery thing you can carry around. You must be thinking of three-story-house size reactors.
rEaL cOmmUniSm hAs nEvEr bEeN tRieD!
Your theories and claims are built conpletely around hypotheticals. Unfortunately we do not live in hypothetical land. We live in the real world. I do not see the use in this "world-building" of yours.
We need to enslave you in technoslavery to solve all your problems because we are too lazy, evil, and greedy to solve them otherwise.
5G is totally ineffective at doing these "weird things with you" unless you are either covidvaxed or are extremely close to the emitters/towers.
ETI
Are demons. Not physical entities.
Ok. But such tech is so far off in the future, and gives off barely any usable energy. Also, health hazards and compatibility issues abound. What's it cost to make em? Material requirements? Technical expertise? You quickly see how the theory is untenable.
Of course it can be monopolized. Who is controlling nuclear power plants, random people like you and I? Of course not!
More techno tyranny apparatuses.
It's both, actually. And we should absolutely focus on the benefits of loving and obeying and having Faith in Jesus that exist in this life as well as the next life.
Define the term "god".
Do you really believe polytheism is true?
This won't do a thing. The enemy will just monopolize and hog the Super Energy Source.
Lol, he just proved communism only works in a fake universe, not ours. It could also work if everyone was sinless, but unfortunately Adam and Eve sinned so everyone is stuck with a sin nature.
Which means that trilobites must be the highest, purest forms of life and we're all just degraded trilobites.
No. God created all the first creatures. Adam and eve sin. Now genes degrade. Then flood bottleneck. Now the condition of genes get worse. And it only gets worse from there.
We have never observed a different family-taxa evolve from existing family-taxa organisms, for the ~6K years we have been here.
Isn't it amazing how schools prop up Peppered Moths as evo proof, when all it is is natural selection? Until they looked at the moths DNA for gains, if no NOVEL FEATURE has been proven, it's not evo evidence at all.
The genes of those moths only degraded over time, not upgraded.
Instant creation... sorted into layers with each layer having a different and unique set of fossils in it, to trick man into thinking that it was formed over time.
No, more that man rejects Genesis and wants to think he can determine origins and age APART from the Bible.
Atheists looove evo and gorillions of years. Because they don't need to believe the Bible to belive those beliefs, whilst still maintaining a sense of our origins and age, and a semblance of reason.
Meanwhile, believing Genesis is fully Bible reliant. The world actively hates and censors it. Unlike evo and deeptime which the world loves. The world loves its own. The world hates Jesus, the TRUTH, and the factual Account of our true origins. Atheistic worldview ideas do nothing to scare the worLd at all. So drop them.
Everything about the instant creation hypothesis hinges on
the Bible.
a single Hebrew word "bara" which only ever refers to creation in one place; elsewhere it refers to clearing and deforesting.
Elsewhere. So, not in Genesis then. Thanks for confirming. Days are mentioned elsewhere in the Bible, guess that means Jonah was in a whale for gorillions of years.
Further, the B in Hebrew is often proclitic, adding "with pleasure" to the rest of the word -- making the correct way to see the word as "b'ra'a" which would mean "look down with pleasure on" consistent with the rest of the account in which each phase God sees that it is good.
According to your worldview death and suffering and incompleteness were all throughout creation, before sin. That contradicts the Bible, though. And that is not "pleasure-some" at all.
and inserting your own beliefs,
No one believed "13.8 billion years" or "all life from some germs" or "germs from goo" until very recently. Well actually, the ancient pagans probably promoted the former two, while followers of God never promoted them.
story of a bunch of shining people
Where?
(yes, plural) coming down from a high mountain to reshape the lowlands and assemble creatures.
"God couldn't create directly, He is so weak He needs helpers to cobble stuff together"
..... no wonder atheists are wholly unconvinced by compromise-with-atheists Christians.
does not come from a plain reading of the Bible at all
The ahteistic worldview beliefs about the past sure don't.
but rather from a bunch of assumptions that you've inserted into it.
Na.
The origin of the idea of creation ex-nihilo is in a debate between a follower of Plato and a [OLD EARTH ADDED ] Christian.
Mabye because plato paid more attention to Scripture than you did.
The pagan myths all involve the gods creating from preexisting matter. Sound familiar??
If I believe Plato, then you believe pagans.
I don't know why the Christians cared so much about having the approval of the philosophers
Self awareness levels in the marina trench. Compromising Christians, Genesis doubters, your ilk, all seek approval from the worLd and Big Science TM, which has proven itself to be a FRAUD, GRIFT, LIE, CHEAT, SCAM, ELITE-RUN, TYRANNY-BOOSTER more and more lately.
but they screwed so much with their beliefs just to get approval that Paul wrote a lot to tell them to stop (and when Paul wasn't there to stop them anymore,
Since you believe in "new revelation being valid", God isnt giving us any new letters for us to stop believing YEC. So either YEC is true or new revelation is never gonna come.
guess what they turned the religion into
Thanks for admitting that compromising one's Christian worldview is bad!!
Anyway, creation ex-nihilo was invented on the spot
No it wasn't. There is absolutely nothing in the Bible suggesting God made light (Day 1) out of existing matter. There is zero reason to assume He made things ex materia unless the Bible SPECIFIES that He did. Like when He made men from dust (and not from some disfigured monkey-like horrid mutant ugly creature), which was ex materia.
Creation ex-nihilo was never taught before then.
Nope, it's been around since before 300 AD. When was abiogenesis, Family-into-family evo, and long ages invented?
It's true that what we understand about star/ planet formation is still very much in a hypothesis phase,
No, we already know how: instant Creation during Creation Week. Nothing would be pulling the planet material together. The only way for a planet to form is God making them. Natural formation, creation, of planets has never been observed, repeated, or tested.
we do have quite a bit of data on star formation.
Yes, Genesis.
But just because numbers of interstellar objects aren't exactly what one particular model predicted doesn't mean that you roll back to
And just because you see some holes somewhere in data relating to Earth's mantle doesn't make YEC false, don't roll back to OEE just because you can't explain the mantle radiation.
a YEC model that doesn't actually make any predictions.
Actually it does. See here: https://answersingenesis.org/genetics/unexpectedly-strong-argument-young-earth/ , https://answersingenesis.org/blogs/ken-ham/2025/04/02/why-tower-babel-significant/ .
And also, we have a much more reliable record of History, the Bible. Bare logic itself neccessitates, madates, that the reliable History Record would override "best guesses".
It is funny how people will trust an assumption from dating that could be changed at any moment over the solid Record of the Bible that has been verified THOUSANDS of times. Old ages (all contraBiblical beliefs, really) has nowhere near this frequent "being proven right" rate and reputation.
And that is ALLLL that long ages is, a best (best for a materialist POV) guess.
Even the very definition of "bio. evolution" is EXTREMELY slippery and whenever I bring up the issue, the definition gets shuffled around, like a magic magician doing the Shell Game. It also doesn't help that people feel compelled to make it unfalsifiable by saying "oh EVERY ANIMAL EVER is evidence" "oh its super slow youll never see it" and stuff.
Nope. Mere words cannot and do not confine anything. Again, your worldview DOESN'T FREE ANYTHING.
/Switch_Mode_Worldview=WordBreakdown----->Normal
(Disabling "WordBreakdown" worldview....)
(Disabling Successful)
(Loading "Normal" Worldview"....)
(Loading Successful)
NOW talk. No word breakdowns.
Your worldview frees nothing.
Without. RE meaning "I scREEEECH" very loud. SON as in Sony TV.
BIBLICAL CHRISTIAN one, not some arbitrary single
There's no such thing as a Biblical Christian Church.
Ofc there is. There are churches that refuse to have a specific denomination label on them. Look at the Verses mentioning the Church or "body of believers".
The Bible canon was decided by late 4th century by the Church.
Idk about the date, but yes you are right that Godly men assembled the Bible.
Acts describe how the apostles created a structured Church with presbyters and deacons, confirmed by laying of hands and liturgical service modeled after the Hebrew tradition.
Wasn't that advice? or mabye policy for Church BUILDINGS?
The Church exists physically
So you mean it's just a building?
u/smithw1984 Debunk u/ factdigger 's arguments? Plenty of them are in here.
Unintentional sins exist, yknow.