Comet 3I/ATLAS is not expected to get very close to Earth; the closest it will come is approximately 1.8 astronomical units (about 170 million miles or 270 million kilometers)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:3I_ATLAS_animation3.gif
Comet 3I/ATLAS is not expected to get very close to Earth; the closest it will come is approximately 1.8 astronomical units (about 170 million miles or 270 million kilometers)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:3I_ATLAS_animation3.gif
No, we already know how: instant Creation during Creation Week. Nothing would be pulling the planet material together. The only way for a planet to form is God making them. Natural formation, creation, of planets has never been observed, repeated, or tested.
Yes, Genesis.
And just because you see some holes somewhere in data relating to Earth's mantle doesn't make YEC false, don't roll back to OEE just because you can't explain the mantle radiation.
Actually it does. See here: https://answersingenesis.org/genetics/unexpectedly-strong-argument-young-earth/ , https://answersingenesis.org/blogs/ken-ham/2025/04/02/why-tower-babel-significant/ .
And also, we have a much more reliable record of History, the Bible. Bare logic itself neccessitates, madates, that the reliable History Record would override "best guesses".
It is funny how people will trust an assumption from dating that could be changed at any moment over the solid Record of the Bible that has been verified THOUSANDS of times. Old ages (all contraBiblical beliefs, really) has nowhere near this frequent "being proven right" rate and reputation.
And that is ALLLL that long ages is, a best (best for a materialist POV) guess.
Even the very definition of "bio. evolution" is EXTREMELY slippery and whenever I bring up the issue, the definition gets shuffled around, like a magic magician doing the Shell Game. It also doesn't help that people feel compelled to make it unfalsifiable by saying "oh EVERY ANIMAL EVER is evidence" "oh its super slow youll never see it" and stuff.