▲ 3 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 3 points ago +3 / -0

He's an atheist. It all makes sense when you accept that. He has rejected Christianity and often attachs c**k to the name of the true worldview.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nazis believed in millions of years. Why do you want to kill old-earthers??

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you don't call out the Censorship he did, your points are less powerful. Begin now.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

ETI are just a fancy name for demons.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

"But muh compfassion and empfatheez guys!! Im such a good person arent I?!?!?"

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

a) Union implies one (uni) action (ion), which separates into

What's getting seperated? Your sense of reality into lots of pieces?

Yes, joining implies union.

unit of reaction

Incoherent phrase.

Only reactions set apart from one another can choose to join together.

Reaction aren't sentient, no.

join/joie - "pleasure; delight; bliss", hence to rejoice - "to own, possess, enjoy the possession of"...joining implies falling for temptation, hence getting owned; getting possessed and repossessed by others.

"OH WOW LOOKY WORDS LOOK SIMILAR THAT MEANS THEYRE RELATED!!!!!!" No.

Prime example for joining...s** (seco; to divide). The more one falls for the temptation of lvst when joining together, the more one up the divide producing off-spring aka the fruit of ones labors aka the coming into being of another UNIT.

(Mad screed)

God implies singularity...joining together implies plurality.

Irrelevant.

Because it puts good vs bad against one another aka at odds...

Nature puts them at odds, naturally.

Phrase/phrasis - "way of speech" implies sound as the way within speech can be articulated.

You sure LOOOVEE this "sound" that speech is "within".

Doing so tempts one to ignore natural (sound) for artificial (speech)

No.

entrance free-will-of-choice analyzing and disassembling crafted spells.

Whilst making your own, implying contradiction... and you TURN ON YOURSELF, implying destruction of your worldview.

L implies "loser" aka a game in-between wining vs losing...

Yes, your word games took the L.

Right implies linear; english implies angular...hence the freemasonic use of square (angular english) and compass (circular logic).

By your logic you're a mason.

Each being is on a journey

What's your journey?

which mutually destroys each others journey.

No.

https://genius.com/Journey-dont-stop-believin-lyrics

Wow, you believe songs actually make authoritative claims about reality.

"FreeWillofChoice is WRONG! FreeWillofChoice is WRONG! Whyyy, oh Whyy, would you believe his Gaaames? Why, Why, Why Why Why!" repeats chant 5 times

...that's what comes before free will of choice.

The letter F does, yeah.

"believe is fictitious"

WHAT YOU believe.

That's what's ficticious. Stop using your obsession with word games to misread what people say.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

DIDN'T aka DID NOTHING...once again a fiction applied to real life.

Your etymology games are DEFINITELY a FICTION applied to real life.

https://etymonline.com/word/apply

https://AnswersinGenesis.org

b) Joining together put things AT ODDS with one another, while

Contradictory. Joining implies union. I'm not obsessed with words yet I know this. Another L for your word games.

ignoring even.

And why is that a bad thing? "Ignoring even" isn't a coherent phrase. Thanks for admitting you don't know how to use english right. Your "mental exercise" has FAILED. So stop it.

b) Notice that factor has ACT (action) in it, which implies reaction in reality. Putting an F before ACT implies fictitious action aka a fiction shaped by reaction within action as distraction for one another.

"F" comes before "ree will of choice", implying absolutely every single thing you do, say, and believe is fictitious.

▲ 3 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 3 points ago +3 / -0

Alnost every single worldview tenet you hold as true is incorrect.

▲ 3 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 3 points ago +3 / -0

NonChristian worldviews convert would be smart people into dribbling morons. Sin strips sanity and truth.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

The architect behind freakmasonry is also behind the nonChristian worldview you believe in.

▲ 4 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 4 points ago +4 / -0

Problem Reaction Solution. The "Solution" is being put in place.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

unwilling to be reasonable

Do you have any evidence of this? Have you tried different tactics?

locking out is working

You say that now, then when he comes back you'll be disproven (again).

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, no quarter to his worldview. Rip and tear his ideology to shreds.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

g**e posting, etc

Ok. The user has revealed they believe in the big bang. They also believe that desecrating bodies is somehow "owning (people i dislike)". They are obviously unbelievers. Atheist or hindu is my guess, but is unknown.

it excites them

Quote? He is probably referring to the sinful content, not votes or replies.

the only good

No, converting them is better.

ruffling their feathers

But not changing their worldview or stance in any way, except making them double down.

While he remains unbanned, it is best to win over his soul in the meantime.

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

How does one apply "none" aka "no one" to real life?

I didn't say anything about "applying none" to real life. What I did say is that your etymology games don't apply to real life.

Applying implies "joining together"

Even if it did, the implication is a non-factor. Thanks for admitting I'm right. Inb4 "Oh, being right implies destruction" or whatever. No it doesn't.

How could application be real if nature shows the separation

Nature shows no such thing. You're being daft.

mother and off spring

Irrelevant. Tangential. "Why is the fountain broken?" "OH LOOK A TWIG FELL AND A SQUIRREL CAUGHT IT" "That's not why the fountain is broken."

Absolute implies "free from limitations"

Only in certain contexts.

yet free will of choice can only work within limitations,

Limitations such as...? I doubt you can name any, since you just spout recited gibberish as if it is factual info.

Etymo (straight) logic (circular thinking) al (all)...it's when one chooses to ignore straight for circular that the game begins.

Thus proving my claim. Who is going to know this? Who actually believes this? What buuldings are going to be constructed by this? NONE. NONE.

The conflict between real vs false only exist within a circle...not within the straight line.

You made that up. That's false.

Why? Because a circle TURNS on itself.

Oh? Is that true or are you hust voniting words for the laughs?

That's false, but if true then that's a good thing. Now turn on yourself.

Practical implies matters (perception) of action (perceivable)...matter consenting to the suggestion of other matter implies speculative.

Try again. And stop confusing matter as in physical matter with matter as in relevancy.

To practice requires one to resist speculation,

What's being speculated about? How competent you are?

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

only excite the trolls

There is absolutely zero evidence that applies to this particular one. He has done this for years, you really don't think your tactic has never been done before with him?

history of abuse

Abuse of what?

▲ 2 ▼
guywholikesDjtof2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

ignore

Your approach has been tried and never worked.

By your logic we should try communism infinity times until the human population only consists of the satanic Elite.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›