1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ve been here since day 1, I’m not sure how long you’ve been here, but there has been a noticeable decline in quality, enthusiasm, engagement, community building, etc over that time

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m shocked anyone can see that guy as anything other than what he is, a mentally ill scammer and spammer.

Regarding censorship, idk, I think Clem made some good arguments in his responses to nay voters - his job is to take out the trash, does the community think FE is trash?

We seem pretty split (maybe less so if the accounts voting Nay were scrutinized - I found 6 incredibly sketchy ones in a quick glance earlier today)

Anyway, cheers man, hope to see more of your contributions here!

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

Agreed, unfortunately.

One of my goals is to get the admins to add the functionality for communities to sort by /active instead of just /hot.

It would turn the forum into an older style “bump” based board. It would hopefully alleviate a lot of the upvote and personality thirsting.

I think it’d be an experiment worth trying

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look dude, that comment is saying far more about TS than it is about you. I’ve enjoyed your contributions where I’ve seen them, but frankly there is a difference in scale between you two.

Skil is basically the only person I’ve ever seen here willing to call out all bullshit (as he sees it, and no, his perspective is not flawless, but it’s certainly quite accurate). He’s the only user I’ve ever seen call out fake talmud passages (and he has the real ones to hand) AND zionist subversion. He’s one of the few I’ve seen call out fake headlines and articles, even (especially) the ones that fit our biases.

Also, while most people here just do nothing (or grumble into the void) about spammers like that savior faggot and the amazon link retard, he gets details and posts them on c/meta, where the admin will then (attempt to) solve them.

So I think, frankly, in the conversation about the “health” of this place, yes, Skil has an outsized voice.

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

That guy seems to “dislike” many conspiracies. A bit of an r/Skeptic-type in my personal estimation. But that doesn’t mean he’s wrong, necessarily.

3
Graphenium 3 points ago +3 / -0

Frankly, I could go either way on wholesale banning of topics. It seems like the vast majority of the “Nay” votes were coming at it from the perspective of free-speech absolutism. Which is great and all. But that doesn’t mean much of anything if they aren’t willing to reckon with valid counter arguments (such as: spam is already removed, FE is spam - or any of the other good arguments)

I think the key point is that many of us just want to raise the quality level of this place, and removing flat earth spam is almost the “lowest-hanging fruit” of that intent.

Yes, that is subjective, but it benefits no one to be paralyzed by indecision

4
Graphenium 4 points ago +4 / -0

We just can’t say either way! It’s almost as if objective truth doesn’t exist! No I’m not a communist why would you say that?!?

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because I oppose mentally ill faggots from sodomizing dogs?

Thanks for admitting you don’t support freeze peach, mongoloid

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

So two factual, on topic comments are “bullshit” and “spam” which necessitate a permanent ban?

Like I mentioned before, follow your dogs into traffic you mentally ill faggot

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nah

Cope, faggot

why

Just so everyone knows your appeals to “free speech” are as disingenuous as every other aspect of your fursona, you fucking moron

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

False, I conclusively demonstrated the existence of a metaphysical layer to reality, and thus strongly indicated the existence of God.

You’re just a parasite infected faggot who fantasizes about fucking animals however, so your response wasn’t surprising.

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

We can only pray he will ban insufferable forum sliding faggots who lack even a smidgen of introspection

4
Graphenium 4 points ago +4 / -0

We just can’t KNOW! That’s all I’m saying maaaan - we CANT KNOW!

That’s how I know it’s flat.

4
Graphenium 4 points ago +4 / -0

InB4 “the builders of the Great Pyramid were {iN oN iT}”

Edit: InAfter salty flerfer drive-by downvotes so rapidly they couldn’t possibly have watched the video, with zero attempt to reconcile with reality

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

You’ve never even made a post to this site in the two years you’ve had an account. Please don’t act like your contributions come anywhere close to Skil’s

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

In 95% of cases it’s not argued in good faith, even if the person arguing it isn’t literally a bot or shill

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

I want everything to be allowed

Yeah, that’s your problem. I bet your a huge fan of “age of consent” conspiracies and “loli faggotry is ART!” conspiracies.

1
Graphenium 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hersh has probably the best track record of any “mainstream” journalist alive today (he has been banned from US publication for over 15 years now lmao)

2
Graphenium 2 points ago +2 / -0

Classic, your mentally ill fantasies get proven wrong, so you slink off to some other retarded bullshit.

Parasite infected moron.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›