10
GlamourSpork 10 points ago +10 / -0

Your brain needs fats and certain amino acids from meat to function completely. Besides the hormones, they are definitely trying to make us even more retarded.

3
GlamourSpork 3 points ago +3 / -0

I left it vague, hoping it wouldn't come to it and I could fight it if I needed to by saying it's invasive...

5
GlamourSpork 5 points ago +5 / -0

I will not give you my exact answers. I do not want it to be searched and found by the company I work for, but I will summarize. I have an odd spirituality that I kinda blended all kinds of stuff together from the time when I was a teen and feeling things out, so I don't belong to a labeled religion, but I did not lie about anything in my exemption. I do believe these things.

I can give you the questions they asked. We also have the flu vax required. I used to fight that every year by arguing that I was remote and saying I'd wear a mask if I was sent into a facility, but now they wrapped that into the mandate.

Please explain the religious belief, observance, or practice that prevents you from getting the COVID-19/Influenza vaccine.

  • Body is a temple. I don't pollute it or alter the way it works. I trust in God.

Please describe the specific conflict between your religious belief, observance or practice and the vaccines. In your response, please identify the specific reasons the vax requirement causes conflict.

  • Repeated the above saying that using that crap will show that I reject my faith in god.

Please provide any info that will help us determine that your belief is sincerely held. Does this belief affect any other aspect of your life? Provide details you feel are relevant.

  • Never had a vax since I became an adult. I had no say as a child. (I have an insane history with vaxxes and injury, but I didn't go into it because it's not their business - not that any of this is - I'm still on the fence as to whether it was karma that I got the vax injury for not fighting harder). I avoid GMO products and chemical pollutants. I believe in prayer and faith healing. I attend a weekly prayer group (they are more of a meditation/intension kind of woo-woo thing, but when any of us get sick we focus on making that person better).

Please identify any job accommodations(s) that you believe would resolve the conflict between your religious belief, observance, or practice. Be as specific as possible.

  • This feels like such a trick question. I stated that I am already remote and will wear a mask if sent into a facility for any reason. I'll do the social distancing, etc, but I will not do anything that will affect my body in any non temporary way. I also stated that there is no job accommodation that will convince me to get a vax to cover all my bases.
3
GlamourSpork 3 points ago +3 / -0

I did not because they could argue that and it's vaguely falling into that science realm. They were used in development but are not supposedly directly injected into you. I did the my body is a temple and it would offend God if I try to overwrite what has been given to me kinda thing. I found some great quotes when searching online.

7
GlamourSpork 7 points ago +7 / -0

I have been remote for 15 years, 11 with the company I'm currently at and they still mandated it. I got my religious exemption approved yesterday. Apparently they asked my manager if being if it was okay for me to not be vaxxed. Seriously?

If you file a religious exemption do not mention anything scientific or about the dangers or injuries. You do not have to mention the denomination, just your beliefs. Do not mention bodily autonomy even if that is part of your religious beliefs. You can have had other vaccines and just become religious yesterday, so don't let them intimidate you.

Anyway, don't bother with medical exemptions. They denied mine, although I did ask the doctor to be vague because I don't want to be discriminated against for my previous vaccine injuries. They stated that it has to be something the CDC says is a contraindiction. So I assume that is nearly impossible.

4
GlamourSpork 4 points ago +4 / -0

The autoimmune stuff is probably already showing up but they love to say it comes out of nowhere which is nonsense.

4
GlamourSpork 4 points ago +4 / -0

You can legally request your records. It does take some insistence and hoop jumping and sometimes they will figure out a way to bill you, but simply say 'I have the right to my medical records, if you do not provide them you will be hearing from my lawyer' and nine times out of ten they will quickly provide them after trying to make you sound crazy with 'I have never had anyone ask for those. You aren't a doctor. You shouldn't be reading them.' etc.

Just be insistent. HIPAA says your records are yours and they are not allowed to deny you.

by Renzus
3
GlamourSpork 3 points ago +3 / -0

I know since electronic health records have become a thing, it's a required field for them (to go into the state registry) . It could simply be because of the registries requiring it.

2
GlamourSpork 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't have linked in or any social media - I had/have a stalker. I think any kind of social style vetting wouldn't work for a lot of us.

I don't know that you could keep glowies out. It is literally their jobs to infiltrate.

by Renzus
6
GlamourSpork 6 points ago +6 / -0

They usually track the lot numbers but I don't think it is for QA - https://cairnsnews.org/2018/11/19/u-s-govt-loses-landmark-vaccine-lawsuit

They also make sure to split and ship lots all over to attempt to hide 'hot lots' through geographical confusion. https://www.sott.net/article/396436-The-Tennessee-Sudden-Infant-Death-Syndrome-cluster-How-Wyeth-concealed-the-DPT-vaccine-SIDS-link

My mom sent me pics of my vaccine records (she wishes she had never vaccinated me or my brother at all but she believed the doctors up until I got so sick from them when I was a teen). There are no lot numbers but this would have been 1978,1980,and 1996. These are just handwritten documents from doctors to get into school.

1
GlamourSpork 1 point ago +1 / -0

Healthcare. I've only seen the numbers for people who work directly with patients and it looks to be 20% unvaxxed and most have applied for exemptions.

I'm sure they will be glad to replace us IT unvaxxed with offshore. They don't mention IT's numbers at all. Other than '90% are vaxxed' but that was from someone who likely just pulled it out of the air. No data were shown.

7
GlamourSpork 7 points ago +7 / -0

This morning they just announced at my work (150k employees) that any non vaxxed will be 'replaced'. They didn't mention if that includes the exempted or not. About 15-20% are unvaxxed from the data I have been able to see.

2
GlamourSpork 2 points ago +2 / -0

Could this be brain damage? I know when I got encephalitis from a vax as a teen I was hallucinating.

I can't believe people are still willing to take it and are 'allowing' their kids to.

2
GlamourSpork 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is insane. I nearly died at 17 from the vaxxes required for college. The MMR booster actually gave me rubella. It was just a mild fever and rash. I would much rather have had all the diseases rather than a lifetime of dealing with the autoimmune crap I've been left with.

4
GlamourSpork 4 points ago +4 / -0

I personally know of two people who were diagnosed with cancer within months of the shot. Sure, it could be coincidence but no one is going to release those numbers because it might show something scary.

The two I know were considered 'healthy' before the vax and were diagnosed with advanced stage cancers. Both regularly went to the doctor.

3
GlamourSpork 3 points ago +3 / -0

VAERS will only become useful if they incentivise ze the healthcare workers to add to it. 90%, probably more, only care about money.

When I was vax injured back in the 90s, my mom asked the doctor to report it (she didn't know anything about VAERS but assumed it should be reported to the manufacturer). The doctor said of course he wasn't going to because what happened to me was listed on the insert so there was no point. And that is when my mom and I learned about the inserts, demanded them, and found that informed consent is a lie. We were told nothing could happen.

Doctors don't see the point in reporting because it takes time out of their day and for the most part none of them care in the least about anything but money and not being sued.

4
GlamourSpork 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you have a reaction beyond 7 days out it cannot be said it's a reaction to the shot, either. They love playing with the numbers to hide the horror.

3
GlamourSpork 3 points ago +3 / -0

The problem is they will never look at the data like that. I'm a data analyst in healthcare. I have access to numbers that should be all kinds of interesting but they seem to purposely avoid anything juicey. It's hard for me to explain because I'm not great with words or explaining what I do.

They track covid positives, suspected covid, number of vaxxed per week, number of covid deaths, but do not store the data so that I could correlate vaxxed and covid positive. They seem to be obsessed with numbers of doses on hand VS given out of remdisivir and the vax but not individuals that take it... There's no follow up of 'died after remdisivir'. And yeah ICU beds used and empty are tracked but they add and take away (which is normal) to keep the numbers in the 85-95% usage range. So please don't pay attention to those numbers when you see them. Look for raw numbers. 20 out of 25 beds. Those numbers will be more meaningful to someone just looking in than the percentages.

I would love to be able to pull vax and cancer data but that's not put into the databases I use. They are being very careful what goes in and make it hard to see anything interesting. Maybe over time as they add more and more pieces of info it will get better, but right now it looks like they are purposefully obfuscating even what they themselves look at.

3
GlamourSpork 3 points ago +4 / -1

Nothing will change but this is amazing. I'm glad he had the balls to speak up. At some point I need to look at the skipped slides. I'm sure they are great too.

3
GlamourSpork 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's already required for remote employees with my employer. I have a feeling it won't matter.

by Nogrim
1
GlamourSpork 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's more entertaining for them to virtue signal than it is to actually do things that might help.

by Nogrim
2
GlamourSpork 2 points ago +2 / -0

I work in healthcare IT. ICU beds are expensive. They try to keep them at 85-95% capacity at all times. They are always 'almost full'. Some smaller hospitals will only have 4 or 5 ICU beds and that's normal. It's not profitable to have a bunch of expensive equipment and nurses set up just waiting. They will have extra beds and nurses and the like ready to go on the fly to toss more people in beds as needed. Hospitals, even 'non-profits', care about money. They need to pay their CEOs millions and they can't afford that if they have massive, unused wards set up.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›