IAM aka je suis (jesus) aka suggested egoism tempting ones consent to take possession over self.
The other side thereof represents suggested collectivism; tempting each singular one within nature to join an artificial WE.
Here's what Ayn Rand wrote in "Anthem" (1938)...
The worship of the word "We." When men accepted that worship, the structure of centuries collapsed about them, the structure whose every beam had come from the thought of some one man, each in his day down the ages, from the depth of some one spirit, such spirit as existed but for its own sake.
Those men who survived those eager to obey, eager to live for one another, since they had nothing else to vindicate them-those men could neither carry on, nor preserve what they had received. Thus did all thought, all science, all wisdom perish on earth. Thus did men - men with nothing to offer save their great number - lost the steel towers, the flying ships, the power wires, all the things they had not created and could never keep.
Hence monger implying "merchant, trader, broker"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/monger aka happy merchant; traitor; breaker of oaths etc.
What is it about the White House that turns every president into a warmonger?
a) To preside (sit before) establishes a conflict in-between those in the back vs those in the front.
b) To preside before those in the back requires the skill of a monger/merchant aka selling others on the idea to buy into backing out.
c) A house (to hide) can only exist in-between white (pure light) and black (absence of light), hence implying ones choice to hide (ignorance) from light (discernment) as a "house divided".
d) Consenting (to buy) to a monger (to sell) turns the buyers against each other aka consumerism aka trade-wars.
elected to end current
An inversion of current sending elect (life) from beginning (inception) towards end (death).
punitive tariffs
Tariff implies assessment aka ones mind seizing (consent) a price (suggestion) from another, which is punitive since it punishes ones perceiving mind within the current of all perceivable input.
FREE will of choice cannot asses (tariff) without punishing (punitive) itself...
before
Aka forwarded (inception towards death) being (life)...the more one questions "before", the more one ignores the implication of being forwarded within after/aft/apo - "away".
as far as the beginning
Far implies for (wards). Begin implies GENerated BEing. End/ant - "front; before" implies forwarded being.
Gentiles are being tricked to measure distance aka how far in-between beginning and end, while ignoring di-stance aka ones divided stance (life) in-between beginning (inception) and end (death).
Measurement permits others to moderate/restrain/confine etc.
Nature doesn't require measurement...all for one, and one for all. How long can one measure ONE without ignoring self? How do you think a chosen one gained control over numbers? Simply by tricking other ones to count and measure each other. How number/numb - "deprived of motion; powerless" can one be?
to have a left uprising take control
a) A jew GIVES a left and right choice to tempt gentiles to TAKE a side against each other.
b) Nature gives (inception) and takes (death) to and fro each being (life).
c) Taking what another gives implies ones downfall; which only when given, permits another ones uprising.
really we are completely controlled
We (plural) + Complete (filled together) + Control (rolled together) are fictitious suggestions tempting one to ignore perceivable reality.
Armageddon is pretty much fake
a) Armageddon aka har gegiddon (Mount of Megiddo) from gadad - "to invade; to cut"
The mount implies the collectivization of many by few, which is based upon invasion (suggestion) by invitation (consent), and a cut (conflict of reason) among many for few to insert suggestions.
Example: any information suggested in-between upvote vs downvote conflict represents armageddon.
b) Reasoning represents a cataclysmic final conflict, because it tempts form (life) to ignore flood (inception towards death), while being moved towards the end/finis/fin of all (final).
Did they ever made a scene with the baby and the Triceratops boss of his dad? When swearing meets beating...what a team.
Stranger than fiction... https://i.pinimg.com/originals/0f/87/fc/0f87fc8a8887bc810624cfd58e511173.jpg
Suffering requires a central nervous system & consciousness - trees have neither.
a) Con (together) scious (to perceive)...each one perceives a tree within nature, yet the suggested word "tree" implies an artificial consciousness of many holding onto a brand by few.
b) A tree growing implies stretching from center outwards, hence a central position stretching its roots/branches/tendons/sinews/nerves outwards.
Growth itself implies resisting sinew/sinati - "to bind" aka a sin, hence sys/syn/sin-stem. All systems are suggested by few to bind the "free" will of many by tempting consent into joining.
c) Being within the process of dying implies being set free to endure (growth) suffering (loss), hence "Do not fear what you are about to suffer" ~Revelation 2:10
the same par as animals
Being implies each different par-tial (life) within the same anima-tion (inception towards death) of whole.
THE aka suggested the-ism tempts ones consent to submit to another, while believing to be on par with everyone else that submits.
"One race; the human race aka we are all the same aka equality of diversity aka e pluribus unum aka "there comes a time when we need to heed a certain call; when the world has to come together as one" aka centralized collectivism aka commonwealth (gentiles) under sovereign (jew)...
building using thought
If I suggest you to build me something in exchange for payment; then your consent implies building, while using the thought of getting payed.
Notice then that I use your consent to build the artificial value called "money".
pyramid
Aka amidst a pyre of fire...
what are the higher levels?
Ones ignorance of level implying a flat aka horizontal balance.
consciousness density levels
Scious/scio (to perceive) implies each ones "sparse" perception within all perceivable, hence sparsely parsed apart from one another. Ignoring perceivable for suggested "densely" puts together (con) many under few.
This densely putting together represents mosaic law.
withholding information
How is a wall of text withholding information? What if holding onto any suggested information tempts one to withdraw from perceivable inspiration?
bloviating
If nature offers all (perceivable) to each one (perception), then why does suggested information feel overblown so often?
If nature doesn't withhold anything, then it "blows" everything through each being in-spira-tion (within spirit of action).
all biological matter is consumable
Motion (inception towards death) consumes matter (life)...logic (circular thinking) prevents bios (life) from thinking straight.
Tier/tirer - "to draw out"...layering tiers of information makes it harder to draw out inspiration.
What does a "settled mind" imply? Ignorance...
there's one such pattern
A pattern implies an "outline" for setting parts together, which represents the suggested inversion of being (life) within a line (inception towards death), hence set apart from one another.
A jew domesticates the gentile mind into pattern recognition through suggested mosaic law aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by putting pieces together) aka by a game called "puzzle".
a) Integral implies each partial within whole...understanding (standing under another); goals (seeking outcome); conspiracy (breathing together); love (holding onto); around (circular thinking); complete (fill together); entire (opposite of partial), and civilization (opposite of being free) tempts one to ignore that.
b) Instigation implies urging onwards, hence suggestion urging consent to follow along, while ignoring that nature (inception towards death) inspires resistance (life).
a) The opposite of a covenant (consenting to suggested) implies a break (perception within perceivable)...
b) Arc implies part (life) of a curved line (inception towards death)...
c) The arc of a covenant implies a "shortcut" from one to another, hence dual-ism (two of the same kind).
d) Perception within perceivable implies reacting to activity; while consenting to suggested puts one to rest, hence noah/noach - "rest"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=noah
Rest (noah) cannot save animation (animals)..
a gentiles worship of idols is prohibited immediately...a jews not until worshiped.
Translate gentile and jew into ME and YOU. If one takes possession of self as ME; then immediately nature prohibits potential (life) during procession (inception towards death) to take possession of any idols/ideals.
Only if one takes possession over self as ME, does each other one become a YOU...hence other ones (chosen ones) not immediately being prohibited from expressing potential during procession unless chosen by ones choice of idolatry.
Taking possession implies giving up potential, which a so called you/jew exploits among gentiles during the natural prohibition period aka ignorance of nature.
It's a jew who suggests each gentile to take possession over self and thereby ignore being potential within procession of nature...ones consent to me establishes the you/jew.
my youtube feeds
a) YOU implies the opposite of MY
b) Fed by tube implies lack of self nourishment.
high member of the freemasons
a) To be high implies above those below...that ain't free; it's a dangerous position to be.
b) Member/mems - "flesh"...joining in flesh isn't about brotherly fraternity or sisterly sorority. It implies intercourse (joining) for off-spring (flesh), hence bringing each anointed one into the flesh.
the same gods
Plurality (gods) implies an aggregation of different singulars, which can never become SAME...only ALIKE.
More likely why would YT push it.
Nature implies push (inception towards death) towards shove (life)...artifice mimics push to tempt shove to get "drawn" into by "withdrawing" from shoving (living) natures push (dying).
A tube channels a flow, which moves the form within faster aka influencer pushing information to draw consent from viewers, who hold onto it.
likely
Hence "like and subscribe"...nature (same) separates beings (different); while few tempt many together (alike) under (sub) a spell (scribe). What is being tempted? Ones consent! Hence PLEASE (plaki; to agree; permission) LIKE and SUBSCRIBE...
Nature implies the perceivable origin for each perceiving being to WANDER in; artifice implies a suggested outcome tempting each being to WONDER about.
Ones consent to a suggested outcome implies "believe"... the inversion of being alive.
freemason secret
Secret/seco - "to divide" implies the division of FREE (life) within DOM (inception towards death) aka natural dominance freeing subordinate beings from one another...a revelation.
Masonry implies free beings tempting each other to join fraternally under the frater/bhrater...brother-hood. It takes 33 steps to straighten up the 33 vertebrae of ones spine, and to realize that joining implies bending to others.
The 33rd step dissolves the fraternal covenant...
former
If form (life) within flow (inception towards death) grows a spine and discerns oneself by separating from one another, then one becomes a FORMER aka one who shapes form within flow.
self alleged
AL (all motion) LEG (law of momentum) SELF (each unit/one of matter)
Leged/legere/litigere - "to bring suit", hence litigation...to drive (inception towards death) a suit (life) aka natural "law suit".
- Natural... all (perceivable) legation (perception)
- Artificial... declaration (suggestion)
payments to and from
Pay/pax - "peace"...contradicted by "to and fro" aka a tug of war within ones ment/mind.
bank
Being implies within (life) a current (inception towards death)...consenting (trusting) to a currency tempts one to choose sides, hence becoming accountable to a (river) bank.
Bank/bankiz - "shelf"...giving trust to a bank establishes a "shelf-life", which permits the money lenders to set the expiration date.
watching the movie
a) A movie implies the artificial re-animation of a captured moment, hence a "moving picture"...the making of such a movie implies masonry, hence building a wall out of fiction within the minds of those who ignore reality by free will of choice.
b) Watch/wacan - "become awake; arise, be born, originate"...that's what one ignores when watching the re-animation of a captured moment. Even worse...oneself becomes captured, and put under a spell, hence asleep by it.
c) Why the zippo? Force impedus aka concealing the fire in-between above/below. Nature reveals fire (life) above (inception) and below (death).
there's such thing as nationalism
NATI (native) + IONAL (all action)...any suggested -ism tempts each perceiving native to ignore all perceivable action.
why all of this is fake. Space farce, nukes, viruses
Being implies RE (ones reaction) within AL (all action)...ones consent given to suggestions like "space; nukes; viruses etc." implies the fail/fake of ones perception.
Space/spatior (to wander); nuke/nucleus (nut) and virus (poison) aren't fake, but distractions from ones reaction (RE) to all action (AL).
I have observed
To observe implies holding onto, so what about the different perspective of each being able to hold onto? What differentiates perspectives from one another, and how could one hold onto anything while being differentiated aka separated?
I'm confident knowing the truth
If one confidence is based upon holding onto truth, then doesn't sharing truth with others contradict ones observation (to hold onto)?
Its simple common sense.
a) If common sense implies simple, then does ones particular sense imply complex? What if it's the opposite? What if COM-mon COM-plexity distracts one from simplicity?
b) Sense/sentire - "to perceive" implies each ones perception within all perceivable, hence be able to become aware of differences within ones surrounding.
How could perception be common without corrupting each ones different perspective? How is common sense different from "hive mind"?
If it's not a...
What if matter (life) can only be shaped within motion (inception towards death)?
What if a conflict about shapes (flat vs round) tempts one to ignore the implication of shaping? Holding onto one shape, while fighting those who hold onto another shape...doesn't that contradict shaping.
What if few suggest both shapes to shape the minds of many into a conflict called reason, based on "circular" logic?
If the earth isn't curving
Doesn't life, while being moved from inception towards death, represent a curvature of growth within a flat-line of loss?
So space is also a hoax
Space/spatior - "to wander" aka distance or interval between (life) line (inception towards death)... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/space
Ask yourself who defines; redefines and contradicts the meaning of the word "space" to distract many from wandering within into wondering about?
how did do this world start?
As form within flow. The fundamental question you so far failed to ask yourself is...can start (inception) and finish (death) only be measured from within (life)?
What if only a partial within a whole can have a measurable beginning and end?
I can't be sure how big it is either
Only within all (whole) can one (partial) grow big or small. Theorizing about how big or small ALL is...curtails ONES growth potential.
we can also throw out
What does it imply if a partial within whole throws something "out"?
a mental trap they programed since we were too young to speak
What if speaking implies using the suggested abc/abecadary/abacadabra of others? What if the shape of words distracts one from sound enabling one to shape? Does holding onto the definition of words contradict the movement of sound?
Teaching a child to respond to a word is called "to civilize"...do it to a dog and it's called "to domesticate".
infinite miles in all directions
Miles aren't infinite, they tempt ones mind to confine itself to a measure-ment in-between start and finish.
What if direction (inception towards death) implies infinite; while directed (life) implies finite?
We were placed
Ones position implies apart from one another. It's place-ment (place within mind) which can be tempted to ignore that, when consenting, and thereby joining, suggested pluralism (we).
overlords
Understanding tempts one to stand-under, while permitting others to lord-over one...
high level
Level implies balance; being implies choice...choice within balance implies as above/so below.
Level implies horizontal aka flat...
will forget where they came from
Will/want implies within need. Forget (forwards getting) implies towards wanted outcome, while ignoring needed origin.
secret societies
SEC (seco; to divide) SOC (socius; together)...nature divides beings from one another; few tempt many together with artifice.
jews are the only ones who know more truth
a) Plural (jews; ones) contradicts singular (one)...not the jews, but each chosen one.
b) To know implies ones perception of all perceivable. Therefore...each one knows all. It's ones consent seeking understanding from the suggestion of another, which tempts one to ignore all perceivable.
A jew doesn't know more...a jew tempts gentiles to ignore all perceivable value for less, and less, and less valuable suggestions.
A jew doesn't rise above...it's gentiles who keep digging below.
A jew doesn't hide information...a jew suggests information to tempt gentiles to hide from perceivable inspiration by ignorance/denial.
A jew doesn't control reality...gentiles give each jew control over fiction (suggestion), while ignoring reality (perception).
owned like property
a) Being implies differentiated from one another...a jew utilizes suggestion to tempt gentiles to give consent "alike".
b) Nature sets each being free (will of choice)...a jew tempts gentiles to believe aka to hold onto aka to take into possession suggested information, hence believing that buying (consent) into what others are selling (suggestion) gives one ownership over it.
In reality...potential (life) during procession (inception towards death) cannot be taken into possession aka matter cannot hold onto motion, only onto each other, which represents the wanted temptation to ignore the need to resist being moved towards DEATH of LIFE.
Whatever a gentiles thinks he owns represents a self imposed burden, which makes it harder and harder to resist (living) temptation (dying). Once a gentiles chooses to let go of self imposed burden...he will "own nothing and be happy".
We are
All was before one can come into being within. We implies the accumulation of many ones by few ones, while ignoring the separation of all into each one.
God is a fake
a) Father (motion) > mother (momentum) > trans-formed-off-spring (matter). From the perspective of matter...motion represents the "unmoved mover".
b) Real implies ones RE-sponse to AL...fake implies ones ignorance of all for one another.
spirituality is that we cannot deny
Free will of choice implies being enabled to bind self by both agreement or denial to one another, while ignoring that all sets each ones free by internal separation from one another.
Separation permits mental denial or agreeMENT of physical. The mental conflict (agree vs denial) is called "reason", and it's artificial aka a hoax.
Coronavirus showed that psychical spirit/spiro (to breathe) can be mentally tricked into denying that "I can't breathe" leads to death, which was then psychically symbolized by putting a mask over ones mouth and nose.
we have a soul
Soul/sole implies one and only...suggested pluralism (we) tempts one to ignore that.
prevent us from connecting
Few suggest US (united states) to CONNECT (e pluribus unum; out of many, one) many together, which in return permits few to remain apart... https://www.amazon.com/People-Apart-Europe-1789-1939-History/dp/0198219806
Nature separates all (whole) into each one (partial)...few within invert this by tempting many together.
Implies running away from perceivable origin, while chasing after suggested outcomes aka catching suggested, while trying to catch up with evermore of it.
a) Nature moves...the thought of stopping the state of any matter sinks one deeper into motion.
b) State implies "circumstance" aka ones stance within a circle aka circular logic internally turning into conflicts of reason externally.
A circle implies a shape...only within motion can matter be shaped, and matter can be tricked with shapes to ignore motion aka outwards idols; inwards ideals.
There's only one way (inception towards death) for each one (life) within, and it moves through...not around.
TO implies natural motion; 9 and 5 implies artificial measurements shaped by and held within minds within motion.
Nature moves life from inception TO-wards death...hence setting free solid within fluid. To measure implies the exercise of moderation, which tempts one to ignore FREE will of choice by binding self to another.
Few utilize tools of measurement like compass and square to moderate the minds of many within a controlled (rolled together) environment aka circular logic within each turning into conflicts of reason among many.
a) Nature implies the work of all perceivable moving through each ones employed perception...suggested tempts ones living choice to consent to corpus-oration aka the spoken language of death.
b) Few suggest words to tempt many to ignore perceivable sound aka corpus-oration by few shaping many into the walking dead.
c) Work (inception towards death) sets one free (life)...
d) An orator argues for a cause, which tempts each listening pupil to ignore perceivable cause (origin) for arguments about a suggested cause (outcome), hence turning minds from origin towards outcome, and against each other within argument (reason).
Chance harms (risks) choice...if taken. Choice adapts to origin (balance); chance tempts choice to take the risk of outcomes (imbalance).
Inception implies "income" of life; death implies "outcome" of life...hence any chance of outcome tempting life to risk death.
Chance tempts choice to bet life on death aka suicide by giving consent, while taking suggested.
Being implies within (life) directing way (inception towards death)...brainwashing implies the use of circular logic as a spin cycle to tumble and dry thought.
What's being washed is suggested information, which logic (internal) and reason (external) moves to and fro, hence rubbing against each other until there's nothing left.
Nature moves perceivable inspiration through each ones perceiving mind, which cannot be held onto, hence not rubbed against each other...fluid (inspiration) merges; solid (information) bursts.
The issue with natural barter (exchanging one for another one)...artificial counting (more vs less than one). Consenting to artificial counting makes ones choice accountable to a chosen one accountant.
If all implies one in energy, then bartering two energy for one energy contradicts reality with fiction.
a) Point implies end (death) of sentence (life)...no sentence can make a point without ignoring sentence/sentience.
b) Using THE implies ones consent to suggested the-ism, which gives another authority to define metaphorical ends with symbolical points...both of which are corrupting ones sentience aka each ones sensation of being (life) send (inception towards death).