What does free will of choice shill for? Freeing ones minds from the confines of reason?
Cause doesn't require belief from any effect within...believing distracts effects from cause.
Because they print money
Print/premere - "to press, hold fast, cover, crowd, compress"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/print
How can something pressed upon a piece of paper by a few...impress; compress, and suppress many?
to bribe
Implies the offer to take.
blackmail
Implies to transfer under cover.
silence their opposition
Tempts one to ignore that sound was silence before words are spoken out loud within.
present
PRESENCE implies each being apart from one another; PRESENT implies the sum of all beings together.
can you break
a) You implies me...holding onto one side binds one to the other. That ain't a break, but a bond. Same trick with can vs can't.
b) Break implies whole breaking into partial...not partials breaking and sharing pieces of self with one another.
One cannot give another a break without ignoring that all was giving each one the break of being.
Being able to wield free will of choice implies being given a break.
- Urge/urgh- "to tie, bind"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/urge
Flow (inception towards death) impels form (life) forwards, which inspires resistance, while tempting ignorance. To ignore implies holding onto form, while ignoring flow. Flow sets form free; form binds itself to other form when ignoring flow.
While bound (wanting to hold onto) one experiences urgency (needing to let go).
a) As growth (life) within loss (inception towards death) one cannot be sure aka "safe against attack, secure, out of danger". That's why few racketeer many with insurances.
b) 100% ignores the separation of all (cause) into each one (effect) within...others suggest percentages to affect ones self discernment. If you believe in a 100%; then you believe in the sum of all things put together aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together)...the inversion of nature separating all into each one within.
c) Thesaurus aka "treasury of words" implies ones memory, within which a jew deposits spell-craft for gentiles to treasure the meaning of.
d) As for the history of anything...nature transfers; it doesn't store. Consenting to suggested history implies a transfer-agreement; permitting ones side to shape what another stores.
columbus
Aka Cristóbal Colón aka Christ of Ba'al Cohen...a sephardic aka se-phar (seafarer) jew.
just how long America has been conquered
- Expulsion of jews from Spain....1492
- Christopher Columbus discovering America...1492
a) Notice that for the resulting conflict among many; it doesn't matter which influencer or information was used by few.
b) "no shit" implies an expression of irony/eiron - "to dissemble"...consenting to suggested information by an influencer implies an assembly.
Few utilize irony to invert analysis (to dissemble) into synthesis (to assemble) within the minds of many.
c) What's the opposite of irony? Sincerity! As in an influencer sharing information in sincerity...which when viewers talk about it shapes into "no shit" irony.
Influencer (Candance Owens) suggesting information (messages) to tempt consenting viewers into a conflict of reason (true vs false) against one another.
Gold/Silver always maintain value....Gold Silver Price Skyrocketing
If it always maintains value, then it couldn't skyrocket.
always maintain value
a) ALL WAY (inception towards death) implies value for each evaluation (life) within.
b) Maintain implies manually (man) holding onto (tain), which life cannot do to the process of dying.
The spiel...others tricking ones perception to evaluate suggested prices. Nature doesn't set prices; it sets free will of choice.
Gold Silver
Gold (malleability) + Silver (to shine; send forth; radiate; illuminate) implies the malleability of each being send forth.
Edit: Giving a gold bar to an infant or an elderly has no value for either to hold onto, yet anyone in-between infancy and elderly will be tempted to take hold of its "fictitious" value. Think about that...
3D
Aka 3 (three) DI (divided into two) MENS (ones mind) ION (oneness of all action)...
Escape
Aka "free oneself from confinement"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/escape
way takes effort
Way gives (inception) and takes (death) effort (life)...
TOGETHER YOU ARE STRONG
Why are many not strong enough to overcome few? How did few gain the strength to undermine many?
If energy together implies strength, then without divided parts...who could wield energy?
What about...apart a master; together a slave?
You burden yourself with your wordplay.
Using analysis to separate synthetic words gives one relief from things held onto...playing implies using ones choice to take a chance, hence burdening self with a gamble.
do you find it fun
a) Find implies "foundation"...only within a foundation can one have the free will of choice to evaluate things as funny or boring. Choosing to hold onto either establishes a conflict of reason (funny vs boring) aka another burden for self.
Notice also that doing something funny becomes boring quick, and vice versa...
b) If ones calls words a play and questions if it's fun...then one's bored.
start...stop...engine
Notice that the start (inception) and stop (death) of life implies an ongoing momentum. What if nature aka the only engine for any being within cannot start or stop? What if a being can be tricked to ignore being EN (within) GINE (generation)?
technology
Aka TECHNO (artifice) LOGY (circular thinking)...what if that tempts one to ignore natures linear progression?
A within a circle
What if the animated (matic) self (auto) implies a linear (inception towards death) progression of self (life)? What if ones manual consent to suggested start/stop technology tempts one to ignore that?
Why are people so worked up about...
Work implies the internal power of energy...about/abutan (on the outside of) tempts one to ignore that. About inverts work.
A jew suggests aboutism... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism to distract gentiles from work, and "work will set you free" unless ignored.
Alien Abductions
-
Alien/alius - "another"...to be implies as one within all among one another aka native within; foreign without.
-
Abuction/abduce - "to draw away"...nature implies the only way for each being within; one draws away from nature when following any other being.
Example...if I suggest Coca Cola to tempt your consent, then I represent an "alien" attempting to "abduct" you from natural thirst.
Yes, but do you think it's possible?
a) Possi-ble aka "able of potential" implies process (inception towards death) enabling potential (life) aka nature making each being possible.
Beings asking each other about possibilities make it more and more impossible to express each others potential. Anytime one adds another yes or no, one binds self to another, hence putting restrictions upon ones free will of choice.
b) Thought moving through one implies process moving through potential...holding onto thoughts implies potential restricting self with possession.
What are the odds?
Always two against one...the two sides one chose from against ones free will of choice in-between.
You starting a sentence with "yes" puts your one and only choice at odds with two conflicting sides (yes vs no).
In nature...two sides (inception towards death) imply one momentum (balance) for each one matter (choice) within. No conflicting sides.
What are the odds between manipulation and actual
ATION (action) implies the actual; MANIPUL (manually filling) implies the reactive. To react implies by ones free will of choice, which others manipulate by shaping fiction (suggested) within action (perceivable).
Manipulation by another implies manipul ignoring ation willingly. How? By putting manipul+ation together into a synthesis, which distracts one from analysis.
How could one discern self as manipul within ation, when ones consent holds the suggested word "manipulation" together? That's why beings cannot communicate in words without manipulating each other.
visitation
If I knock at your door, and you let me in, that's visitation and invitation, right?
Let's change the perspective...if you pay taxes then it isn't your house, and you have no right to invite me into what isn't yours; right?
If home is where the heart is, then how could a heart invite or visit another? Love they say, yet that puts one at odds against hate aka love invites hate and vice versa. Notice also that hate wants to destroy love, while love doesn't want to meet hate...does that sound like a real or a fictitious conflict?
Let's go at change itself...motion changing into matter implies invitation (inception) > visitation (life) > suspension (death).
If one believes in visitation from another, then one fell for the suspension of disbelief aka avoidance of being a invited visitor.
tl;dr: whatever one thinks is possible...one thinks in languages; shaped by others, which ones consent made possible.
To translate implies a "transfer across", hence transferring German across English...using a disCLAIMer contradicts the transfer across by tempting watchers to hold onto additional information during a transfer aka a self imposed burden.
reverse it and power = money.
Energy moves in one direction only...those who are holding onto money are reversing their line of thinking.
knowledge is power
Knowledge implies equality; power implies each differential (perception) within equal knowledge (perceivable)...others suggesting what IS tempts one to ignore what WAS perceivable.
busted their illuminati ass.
You ain't gonna find light bustin' ass...only darkness, but "if bustin' makes you feel good"; then you know who you've to call.
money = power
Power implies difference among potential within equality of energy...money equalizes differences if consented to. Those who consent to money empower those who suggest money.
SIDS
Infancy implies during the process of adulteration, hence inception implicating death of life. The word "sudden" (unforeseen) tempts one to ignore that. Ones consent to the suggested word "sudden" implies a syndrome (running together), which inverts the infancy of an OFF-SPRING (setting apart).
The label SIDS tempts one to want to hold onto it (labels are sticky), while ignoring that an off-spring needs to be let go of...doing that shapes postpartum depression.
concern
- Con (together) cern (to perceive) implies fiction.
- Dis (apart) cern (to perceive) implies reality.
Analysis implies real; synthesis implies fiction. Off-spring implies a separation during an analytical process; the label SIDS implies a synthesis.
A straight line (inception towards death)...this is what they (life) plan on.
Nature can only move in a straight line, hence being a current...others suggest prices to tempt one to hold onto a currency, which distorts those within the straight line into circular conflict (up vs down aka expansion vs recession).
house price vs house hold disposable income
Momentum (inception towards death) represents the house for matter (life)...within that house; the price of each being implies FREE will of choice.
Choosing to hold onto anything like paying a price for a suggested house...makes oneself disposable income.
Income implies coming (inception towards death) in (life). Dis-pos-able implies being enabled to divide ones position.
including your thoughts
If one thinks in language, then whatever one thinks about is included within the confines of a language suggested by others. It's thinking in words which prevents one from being exclusive within the sound of nature.
Ones perception within all perceivable implies exclusion of each from one another...ones consent to any suggestion makes one inclusive to others, which is how a parasite gets invited by a host.
Within. RE (to respond) SON (sonos; sound).