its never ending cycle
How does one shape a circle? By drawing a line and combining beginning and end together. The never ending implies the line...not the circle shape within. It's ouroboros again aka circular logic preventing one from thinking straight.
giving good
Nature doesn't give good...natures gives all to each one within. A being is tempted to ignore all given for wanting (good) or not wanting (bad) from one another.
wheel of time
Time implies taking a measurement of linear progression, which by setting artificial beginning and end, establishes a wheel (circular logic).
A line (process) cannot be taken (possession) without contradicting the potential of each one within.
you give a lot (of nutrition) to chew on.
Only nature gives and takes, which in terms of nutrition implies "hunger"...not whatever a being chooses to chew on.
These temporary bindings are how we grow!
a) One grew free before choosing to bind self to others (we).
b) Freedom implies temporary during ongoing...any bonds made restrict the temporal from freely responding to ongoing.
The oak grows stronger in the wind
Only during temptation can resistance grow.
All did that to allow choice
Allow aka "all lowering" each one within. Dis-al-low implies the division of each one lowered within all.
Allow and disallow are not in conflict with one another...others suggest allow vs disallow to tempt ones choice into a conflict against one another.
the choice between seeking, or rejecting, re-union
a) Seeking implies suggested outcome...finding/found/foundation implies perceivable origin. "seek an ye shall find" tempts one to ignore that only within foundation can one seek outcomes.
It's also seeking which tempts one to ignore singularity (foundation) for plurality (outcomes aka all the stuff one has and hasn't found yet).
b) Re (to respond) ject (to throw)...being implies thrown (inception towards death) response (life).
c) Reunion implies each ones (uni) response (re) within action (ion)...not the coming together with one another as suggested by others as for example reunion celebrations.
Where's the self reflection in reuniting with others?
Desire implies want; require implies need...Living naturally, these rightly align - would you agree?
These implies plural...ones want within oneness of need implies singularity. It's your plural view, which contradicts alignment aka thinking straight. Instead you think circular (agree vs disagree) aka versus/vers - "to turn".
How could a turn be rightly aligned? Using implication (if/then) instead of reason (vs) realigns oneself to all, because it prevents one from turning against one another.
millennia removed from nature, seems to be this process of analysis
Millennia implies measurement taken aka a synthesis. Nature cannot be taken from...it moves (inception towards death) response (life) apart during an analytical process.
One cannot perceive a millennia...it's a suggested span (distance between two objects).
ultimately a choice
Since when is choice an aim (ultimate)? It's the response to being directed. Others utilize suggestions to tempt ones choice to aim consent at it.
Consent implies shooting blanks...it makes choice infertile by inverting it into chance.
procession of choices
One process (inception towards death) for each ones potential choice (life) within..."choices" implies ones choice consenting to suggested pluralism aka potential taking into possession.
How does one express potential when possession represses?
questions are made painfully
Question (a quest towards outcome) and answers (from others) tempt one to ignore solution (being dissolved within action). The pain represents the ignorance one feels when gaining answers to questions. No pain; no gain.
Suggested answers amount to nothing/nihilo (ones denial of perceivable) and any quest moves life towards death.
them/us/you/me and the like
Aren't them, us, you and me different from one another? If one consent to the suggested labels them, us, you, and me, then does that shape alike consensus?
How many define self as them, us, you or me? How come that only oneself can see through that deception?
How could one (potential) within all (process) be me/mine (possession)?
“hermits” and “retards”
Aka isolating the ones (jew) who don't fit the sum (gentiles)...nature isolates; artifice summates.
that’s the shitty (?) part about using language to communicate, not only is “it” ever-shifting, but everyone has their own personal definitions for words.
a) Definition aka deaf phonetician (deaf to sound) implies each ones choice to hold onto words, while ignoring that sound moves, and cannot be held onto. This ignorance permits others to shapeshift letters into words.
Letter implies one who LETS another shape words...
Shift implies each shifting choice within linear progression of all balance...the issue is shifting to hold onto one side over the other, while ignoring the process of separation.
b) Ones "parts with shit" during a process unless shaping a temporary congestion like as if by holding onto words that continue to lose their definitions.
Analysis sets apart; synthesis holds together...that's why others throw shit if one takes their definitions apart. It's like not wanting to let go, but simultaneously having too much already and so the projection begins.
to communicate
TO implies towards aka to (inception towards death) ward (life)...living implies as warden within process of dying.
COM (together) contradicts UNI (apart from one another)...what could one communicate to another one, that all hasn't already set apart from one another?
Notice together (intercourse) apart (off-spring) implying a choice of needing let go during the temptation of wanting to hold onto. That's implies analysis of natural comm-unic-ation...it doesn't require me to communicate it to you as a synthesis, yet only oneself can discern the distinction between analysis (perception within perceivable) and synthesis (consenting to suggested).
We choose to struggle to communicate, because, I believe
Ones choice to posses self (I); hold onto (believe) and join others (we) increases ones struggle to sustain self apart from one another within all.
Letting go of COM (I; believe; we) allows UNION aka ones discernment about being a unit (uni) within all (ion).
we recognize the alternative
If one joins we, then how could one alternate from one another? Recognize that contradiction....
The sound of doing
Nature does; each being within re-does. Nature does in silence; beings tempt each other with noise to ignore that.
Motion has nothing to oppose...only matter within motion can oppose each other. Motion implies sound; matter implies instrument; opposing each other implies noise.
our tales of
Tailing one another like ouroboros. A tale implies recounting a piece of information, while ignoring all inspiration, which permits others to hold one accountable.
What one tells to another...all makes available. A "tall-tale" implies the tower of babel/babble...which always collapses upon its foundation.
maybe people will listen?
Listening from list/leizd (border/band) to one another does what to ones FREE will of choice? Bondage!
Even Without words
Even sound generates odd instruments...words tempt instruments at odds with one another.
they are there
They implies plural; there implies singularity...they was put there by ones consent to the suggestion of another.
Inception and death implies one momentum of one motion for each one matter living within...it's describing "them" with words which tempts ONE to ignore that.
come to know
One came to be into all known...others suggest that knowledge is coming to those who consent to carry information forwards, hence burdening self during the relieving revelation of all known.
What does all known revelation reveal? Each ones FREE will of choice.
here is something beyond
Being (be) at a distance (yond) implies each beings divided stance from one another...within all aka each thing within everything.
Others suggest something aka the "sum of things" to distract one from distance (divided stance)...ones consent to any suggestion closes the distance to it, while bringing the suggested information not just nearer, but into ones mind/memory.
a foundational reality to be shared, don’t you think?
Sharing implies carrying...carrying implies burdening "free" will of choice. Each one implies a share within all...sharing with one another ignores the all sharing process.
Share/sker - "to cut"...a separation from one another. Carrying shares implies putting together.
If a part within whole shares with another, then it sacrifices self.
The fruit of ones labor aren't for one to give to another, but ones response to all given. Ignoring this by sharing fruit as results/resilire - "to rebound"...binds ones responding free will of choice to another.
In short...foundation cannot be shared. Each part build on it represents a fundamental share; not to be shared with one another.
What is the “right”
Right/reg - "to move in a straight line". Right was forwarding before one comes into being.
interpretation
Aka being within (inter) traffic (preta/per) of action (tion)...the issue is trafficking artificial "rights" among one another, while ignoring natural "right" aka the one and only way of life.
Christianity, the Way, or more generally, the Truth
Way implies all generating each anointed one within...a process one ignores when holding onto truth.
Im not here to preach
- Papa don't preach...I'm in trouble (inception towards death) deep (life).
- I made up my mind (with suggested information by others)
- I'm keeping my baby (babel; confusion; disorder, hence babbling on whatever suggested information one keeps).
what are your thoughts
Not yours unless choosing to take possession of, at which point one becomes possessed by thoughts others can inject.
bring us all any closer
All brought each one apart from one another to allow analysis...others try to bring us (united states) together to distort analysis by synthesis.
desire/require
Desire implies want; require implies need...wanted temptation needs to be resisted.
speak as generally
General aka "generating all" implies all sound generating each instrument within...speaking as implies the articulation of sound into words aka spell-craft.
autistically hyper-focused
you are forced to put...into words
Sound doesn't force one to articulate words...articulated words tempt one to ignore the force of natural sound.
Force/for - "forwards"... that implies sound, not words held onto. You may think to put words forwards, but without others carrying them, they go right back into origin (sound).
Before one can put artificial words to one another...nature forces each being apart from one another.
your wisdom
DOM (balance) sets one FREE (choice)...choosing to take into possession (your) binds one to the possession, hence becoming possessed.
Wis/wise - "to see; know" implies each ones perception within all perceivable...a process of separation (analytic); not a possession (synthetic).
all the others
Each one within all..."all the others" implies the sum of all things. Being isn't a summation; but a divination/division.
The more one sums up from others (information); the less one recognizes all (inspiration).
The soil from which truth grows
Being implies seed within soil...taking what grows prevents growth. Indulging in the fruit of ones labors tempts one to ignore growing fruit. Growing potential implies during the process of loss...holding onto potential implies holding onto the process of loss, which sucks potential dry exponentially faster.
What others profess, I will also proclaim
a) Before others can speak (fess) forward (pro)...all separated each one from one another.
b) If FREE will of choice CLAIMS, then it binds itself.
c) PRO implies forwarding need; CLAIM implies wanting to hold back during forwarding need.
Forced principles will not be viable
Being implies viability (life) by force (inception towards death)....principal aka primus (first) capere (to take) implies viability making itself unavailable by holding onto force.
Whatever others are suggesting cannot be prin/prime (first)...first perceivable; then perception.
Will was made viable before "not" can be willed. Not/nothing/nihilo implies suggested nihil-ism tempting ones de-nial of perceivable.
what is a good man but a bad man’s teacher? What is a bad man but a good man’s job?
What's good and bad but the temptation to choose a side, while entering a ring (circular logic) for mutual destruction (good vs bad reasoning)?
innate process(es) available to everyone
Innate implies potential born (nasci) within (in) process, hence inception towards death procession giving potential life to "each" one.
One process for each potential within aka one cause for each effect within aka one action for each reaction within etc.
Others make pluralism available to distract one from singularity, and thereby self discernment aka "introspection, self-reflection, and authenticity".
there is logic pointing in both directions
Logic implies circular thinking aka two sides pointing at each other (conflict of reason). Direction aka directed by action implies linear progression.
Only within linear can circular be shaped...logic tempts one to hold onto the shape.
Here's a modern sleight of hand for it... https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/onedirection/onewayoranotherteenagekicks.html
"One way or another...I'm gonna get you". One way implies the natural way aka one direction (inception towards death) for each one (life) within. The other (circular logic) is where I'm (suggestion) gonna get ya (consent).
processes are available
Only within singularity can plurality be made available to each separated unit by few suggesting many to join together.
rare are the ones who follow the path
a) What's rarer than being one within all? Simultaneously...what's more common than being one among one another within all?
Self discernment implies rare; common consensus diminishes that rarity.
b) If there's only one path (inception towards death) for each one (life) within, then following it implies what? If others suggest plurality and one follows many different path within the confines of circular logic, then what does that imply?
Following the path like a hamster in a wheel...
those who choose the time of their death
Aka wasting potential (life) by taking measurements, while ignoring that only process gives (inception) and takes (death).
Taking implies giving self up...giving implies tempting others to take. The narrow path...letting go of what was given, while resisting the temptation to take.
congregations of humans
a) Human aka hue of man implies color aka spectrum of light separating each ray within from one another.
Only within animation (animal) can a hue of man (human) bring differences to each beings sight.
b) Con (together) gregare (to collect)...one can only artificially collect together what nature separates apart.
as the congregation grows
Procession (inception towards death) grows division of potential (life)...congregation grows indigestion within potential.
to mistake the teacher for the lesson
Taking implies missing given. Teaching implies responding to given while learning, and vice versa. Lesson/less/loss cannot be taken without giving up growth.
impediments to our forward momentum
Forward momentum (inception towards death) forwards matter (life)...impediment implies mentally ignoring physical momentum. "Our" implies collective consciousness tempting singular mind to take possession during a given process.
Impeding ones mind doesn't prevent ones body from being moved forwards.
one of the main
One (perception) of the main (perceivable)...any suggestion is minor to it. Ones consent to any suggestion impedes ones mind with the suggested into becoming one of the minor aka those who under-stand.
did not believe that history necessarily progresses
To believe implies storing what process necessitates...resisting the temptation to hold onto.
Others suggest "history" to tempt ones "belief" to hold onto it.
Mozi's moral teachings emphasized introspection, self-reflection, and authenticity, rather than obedience to rituals + Mo Zi is credited as the founder of...
Taking the credit/creed/belief of others to be a founder contradicts introspection, self-reflection, and authenticity.
gigantic block
a) A solid can only come into being within fluid, which in return permits any solid to be shaped within fluid.
b) Nature implies all for each one within...gigantic vs miniature implies one within all taking measurements, while ignoring all given.
c) Nature cannot be blocked...a being can block itself by ignoring natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion). A mason of free (will of choice) suggests the ignorant ones "building blocks" to play with...
basement
What's the foundation (base) of mind (ment)?
a ring used to "seal demons"
Demon aka dai (to divide) mon (to provide)...the ring to seal those divided within all provided implies circular logic (internally) turning into conflicts of reason (externally).
why a sigil
Drawing a sigil implies shaping division within provided...consenting to a suggested sigil "marks" and "seals" oneself.
Nature reveals sight...any artificial sign con(s/c)eals sight.
To Seek Justice
Seeking distorts seeing...seeing implies in response to origin (perceivable); seeking implies narrowing sight towards outcome (suggested).
Option To Seek
Option aka op (to choose) tion (action). Action (balance) moves towards reaction (choice)...seeking tempts one to ignore that process.
"Seek an ye shall find" implies that no matter what; where; when; why one seeks...foundation was always there for one to seek within.
all people
People (plural) implies an aggregation of person (singular)...person implies per sonos (by sound) aka each one within singularity of all sound.
One wasn't born a people, but a person. One chooses to identify as a people, hence joining others mentally (ideal) and physically (idol).
trapped inside
a) Trap implies a "contrivance for catching unawares"...consenting to any suggestion makes ones perception unaware of all perceivable.
Ones consent gets one caught within a consensus with others.
b) IN (life) SIDE (inception/death) implies being given SIGHT WITHIN...which one ignores when choosing to hold onto any side.
government approved credentials
Aka ones consent to the suggestion of another, hence a credit/credence given to approve another to govern ones mind with the suggested.
The Holocaust...It happened.
This is called a sponsored post aka advertisement aka state funded propaganda. The so called "rant" represents the sales pitch for it.
Virginia Giuffre to be with Prince Andrew
- Virginina/virgin/virgo (pure; unblemished) + Giufree (god free)
- Prince/prins (sovereign) + Andrew/andros (man)
This is script-writing aka a woman who has had no carnal knowledge of man (virgin) meeting a sovereign man (andrew).
How did Epstein "force"
a) Ep/apa (water) + Stein (stone) aka fluid (inception towards death) forcing solid (stone) to resist temptation.
b) Telling a virgin (virginia) that a man (andew) is her sovereign (prince)...tempts her to loose her virginity aka sacrificing her resistance.
Nature forces being to resist temptation...other beings utilize the force of nature by tempting resistance with the path of least resistance...ignoring to resist, while falling for temptation.
Temptation coerces resistance if chosen...
what they're teaching
Darkness over light...
creation
Creatio ex nihilo aka "The Tree of Life, or Etz haChayim (עץ החיים) in Hebrew, is a mystical symbol used in the Kabbalah of esoteric Judaism to describe the path to HaShem and the manner in which he created the world ex nihilo (out of nothing)"... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creatio_ex_nihilo
Everything implies light; nothing implies darkness. Light was before darkness can be shaped within.
What denomination
Nominare (no name). Naming implies "identifying by mark". Nature doesn't mark/merg (to bind)...each being within is set free (will of choice).
Ignoring natural for artificial implies DE (division) NO-MINARE (no name), which is where creation out of nothing (creatio ex nihilo) comes into play.
Noah looks black
a) Noah from Hebrew Noach (rest)...nature moves; ignoring that implies ar-rest-ed development within being. Ignorance implies darkness; discernment implies light.
b) Black implies absence of light; white implies pure light...being implies within the visible spectrum of light, hence in-between white/black...neither of which one can perceive.
c) Look/lock implies resting sight aka ignoring that the visible spectrum of light moves.
d) Noah aka two animals each on one arc...being implies one animation (inception towards death) for each part of a curved line (life) within.
Noah (rest) implies a beings resting mind ignoring natures motion aka two contradicting animations (two animals) within each beings arc of life.
- Win/wen - "to desire, strive for"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/win
Being implies rise (life) during loss (inception towards death), which implies ones need to resist wanted desire.
After Axeotl_Peotl left...
Atl (water) + xolotl (slippery one)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/axolotl
It would contradict nature for axolotl to remain in place.
focus our energy
Only at center of energy can one focus...collaboration with one another distracts ones focus.
primary topics
A topic cannot be primary, since it implies a secondary topping upon a primary foundation.
where is the collaboration?
Collab/collar/collum - "neck". Working together tempts one to ignore that work (energy) sets each power within apart from one another. Cause and effect aren't collaborating with one another...
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see... https://genius.com/Wu-tang-clan-protect-ya-neck-lyrics
"Watch your step/stebh (to support)...protect ya neck (to collaborate)"
to push their own idea
Only nature pushes (inception) and pulls (death)...others push ideals/idols to pull one in, by tempting one to hold onto (own).
Nature cannot be owned... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rights_of_nature
in a united manner
So like united states; united nations; soviet union; european union; united kingdom aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together)?
departed from God
Being within God implies each beings divided (de) partial (part) mind (ment). Coming into being implies departmentalization.
lost God’s favor
God implies ongoing loss; each being within temporary growth aka the partiality (favor) given to each being.
given them in past time, and had been promised them for the future
Promise aka per (forward) + mittere (to send)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/promise
Therefore...God giving (inception towards death) promise (life). Taking it tempts one to ignore that, like taking measurements (past; present; future), which implies oath breaking aka taking careless invocations of divinity.
of all nations
Nati (native) ion (action)...the latter implies all action; the former each ones reaction within. NATI implies of ION. Plurality (nations) contradicts singularity (nati-ion).
offered up to God
God implies all offered...each one within a recipient (perception) of all offered (perceivable). God offers up (inception to life) and down (life to death) simultaneously.
Those within God have "nothing" to offer God...only self sacrifice by ignoring the one and only offer given.
nation to be overthrown
A native (nat) within action (ion) cannot be overthrown...only understand (standing under) other natives by free will of choice.
invitation to happiness
Happi/hap - "chance"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/hap#etymonline_v_1453
God gives choice...others shape invitation (suggestion) to tempt choice to take a chance (consent).
God cannot invite because that would imply from outside of God. Inception and death of life implies within God aka internal division/divination.
to pass to others
Passing to others (consent towards suggested) tempts one to ignore being (perception) passed (perceivable) within God. It's passing to others which establishes a market; a merchant, and a product for sale.
Reasons why Muslims are much better than jews
a) A jew distinguishes between revelation (perception) and reason (suggestion), which in Muslim terms goes: "giving priority to the Qur'an and the Hadith (the practice of Muhammad) and only then look at the consensus of the Muslim jurists (ijma) and analogical reasoning (qiyas).
Ijma implies the one shaping the suggestion; Qiyas implies the resulting conflict among those consenting to the suggested...both of which distract from perception.
b) The golem/goyim only ever choose a side within reason, hence "are much better" implying...are vs aren't; much vs less; better vs worse" aka circular logic; no matter which side one chooses to fight for.
c) In nature reason implies ones response (re) to all sound (son)...not to one another's words.
satan's cross
a) Leviathan's cross; from l-w-h - "to wind, turn, twist"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/leviathan
Nature directs being (life) across (inception towards death)...artifice turns being from perceivable origin towards suggested outcome.
b) Notice the difference between the leviathan's cross bottom (infinity) and the oreo cross bottom (circle)...the former goes on; the latter eats (boros) it's own tail (oura).
The leviathan's cross also represents propagation, hence penis shaped.
c) The double cross implies ones perception being moved across all perceivable, while being "double-crossed" by another ones suggestion.
Example of double-cross...Union Jack
d) Look at the cookie...white (discernment) in-between black (ignorance), which implies cooking - "turning over within mind"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/cook
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see..."the letter C stands for Cookies". Letter C implies "letting see", hence if ones lets perception see suggested, then one gets cooked.
https://genius.com/Cookie-monster-c-is-for-cookie-1995-lyrics
Edit: Another example for leviathan and propagation...LEVI...all about the jeans/genes.
Supernatural Deep State
Super implies "beyond" aka being yond (alienated in mind; wandering/wondering)... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/yond
Ones state within nature deepens if one goes yonder...
Hell is...
Hell/kel - "to cover; conceal"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/hell
Heaven implies "to heave" aka lifting/raising oneself up aka enlightenment, which ignorance conceals. Being implies in-between heaven (discernment) and hell (ignorance).
crossing over to the next level
a) Level implies balance (inception/death); being implies choice (life)...balance evens out each odd choice within.
b) There cannot be a next balance...only ongoing balance for each temporary choice coming into being "next" in line.
c) Life being moved from inception towards death implies being moved "across" aka over the river styx...styx/sticks because the river (inception towards death) tempts those crossing over (life) to hold onto.
Homer called it the "dread river of oath"...the more life holds onto one another by oath; the more life dreads death.
Most Victims...are Muslims
Muslim (one who submits) from aslama (he resigned)...how to sacrifice someone who self sacrifices?
a logo celebrating original sin.
Logos (word) distracts from origin (sound)...sound sets instruments apart from one another; words tempts instruments to sin/syn (join together aka syn-chronize).
Consenting to words establishes a synchronized consensus within the origin of sound.
Apple/apply - "to join or combine"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/apply
The etymological sense is "bring things in contact with one another", which inverts nature setting each being apart from one another.
No, you connect their meanings.
Taking words apart allows one to discern self within the process of sound. Meaning implies "taking" measurement, while ignoring sound "given".
Sound cannot be held onto...words tempt one to ignore that by holding onto meaning. An example to describe this...holding onto a DEFINITION makes one a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound).
Are sandwiches actually witches turned into sand?
Connecting sand + wich turns one from actual (analytical) to artificial (synthetic)...doing that implies witchcraft aka insert (suggestion) between two other things (all perceivable and ones perception) aka a sandwich.
He connects words
free-will-of-choice sets words apart (analysis).
nonChristian
guywholikesDjtof2024 connects words together (synthesis).
case and point
a) Con (together) nectere (to bind)...binding together binds ones free will of choice to another.
b) Non (nothing) implies suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) tempting ones de-nial of perceivable.
c) Christian/christen (to anoint) implies separation of each one within all from one another.
How does EL imply ALL?
- HOW implies cause (all) forwarding effect (one)
- DOES implies doing (do) essence (es) aka all doing each ones essence.
- IMPLY aka Implication aka within (im) fold (plica) action (tion) implies each ones reaction within the fold of all action.
- ? implies one marking a quest (outcome) within all action (origin).
Is there a Hebrew lexicon which suggests that?
a) https://biblehub.com/hebrew/413.htm aka "into, unto, denoting motion towards", hence from all into/onto each one within.
b) All "was" perceivable before one can suggest what "is" to one another.
c) Consenting to any suggestion tempts ones perception to ignore all perceivable.
d) What if he-brew his-story to make you/jew fall for it?
Notice that brewing implies dissolving ingredients by mixing together, and storing implies accumulating quantities. Holding onto history accumulates quantities of gentiles, which a jew mixes together...
I don't think
Thinking implies ones potential (perception) within all process (perceivable)... I implies holding oneself in possession, while don't implies suggested nihil-ism (nihilo; nothing) tempting ones de-nial of perceivable for suggested.
In short...both "I" and "don't" corrupt thinking.
I don't think vessel and vassal are related etymologically
a) Relate aka re (to respond) latus (to carry) implies burdening oneself within all by carrying words along.
b) Etymo (true) logi (logic) al (all)...logic implies circular thinking within oneself turning into a conflict of reason (true vs false) against one another, which ignores that all moves each ones life from inception towards death, hence straight...not circular.
Only within a line can a circle be drawn. A jew tempts gentiles with words (logos) into an inward (logic) and outward (reason) circle, while seeing offense in the word kike/kikel - "circle".
nor to the word "all"
One can only shape a word within all sound. Holding onto a definition makes one a DEAF PHONETICIAN aka one deaf to phonics (sound).
Sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/sound
wiktionary...vessel/vassal
a) Craft for transportation (vessel) + servant (vassal) aka all transporting (inception towards death) each one servant (life).
b) Trans (transfer) port (to lead) ation (action) aka all action leading each ones reaction within a transfer.
c) Servant/serve aka to be (life) in service (inception towards death).
Dominance (inception towards death) setting free (life) implies FREE (slave) DOM (master). A jew inverted this by tempting gentiles to freely enslave "ones choice" to a "chosen ones" suggestion, which makes the latter the master of the former.
Different Socrates... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socrates_of_Constantinople