validate the death
How could anything living give legal force to dying? What if it's the opposite...what if dying (inception towards death) gives legal force to life?
The upvotes you get only validate...
... Matthew 7:1 aka the encouragement of self reflection and humility.
a rose tinted view
Do few shape the views of many to infect tint aka to taint by entertainment aka entering and tainting mind?
I remember
That ain't using memory, but abusing it by holding onto and continuously reshaping fiction. Retaining fiction within memory puts one into feudal service to another.
insanity takes over society
One enters privately when taking part within society...so society takes over if privacy is given over.
As for insanity aka in (within) sanus (sound)...that implies each beings position within all of nature.
not willing to talk as a society
Free will of choice implies a privacy...choosing to join a society leaves privacy at the door. Society confines will within consensus.
proving a point
Being implies sentience aka inception sentencing life towards point of death...few suggest rhetorical points to tempt many towards the end of life-sentence aka forwards.
In short...suggesting a point implies progressivism. It's from that perspective of wanting to progress forwards that one views anyone who resists as retarded (delayed; slowed).
As for Islam (submission)...that implies ones submission to another aka follow the leader aka once again progressivism.
SchizoGPT
Free will of choice isn't pre-trained, but adapts as a transference within generation, while the separation between transference (perception) and generation (perceivable) implies a schizo/schism aka a division.
will you be quiet
Does one have the free will of choice to be quiet? Also...while being surrounded by others; where could one find quietude?
soul
Aka sole (one and only). Soul/sole implies the animation of the one and only God moving through anyone within.
conception
Con implies "together"; in implies "within" aka apart from one another. Conception represents an artificial concept inverting natural inception.
mormon
A contradiction in terms...mor (more) mon (mono; singular)
"America's nightmare: Young, black, and didn't give a fuck" ~Quote from Menace II Society (1993)
Why is it so controversial to say that "pro...
...because saying pro puts one contrary to contra.
Why is the idea...
...because others suggest idealism to tempt ones consent into idolatry.
values
There can be only one value (perceivable) for each ones evaluation (perception)...others suggest pluralism to devalue evaluation with artificial value.
culture of critic
Everyone's a critic/krei - "to discriminate, distinguish; discern"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/critic
A jew suggests multiculturalism to destroy critic among gentiles by artificially mixing together what natures separates from one another.
The issue with culture of critic...LOGY (circular thinking) contradicts PSYCHO (linear power of animation). A jew adapts to natures linear progression; while tempting gentiles into circular regression against each other.
The only way to heal is through the truth
Both truth and lie tempt one to hold onto; while binding one into conflict against another...a jew suggests words (logos) to tempt each gentile to hold onto (logic); while fighting each other (reason).
Nature implies the way of sound moving through each instrumental mind within...words imply the articulation of sound aka spell-craft.
same person...twin
Can you show the same twin without each person being at a different position aka differentiated from one another?
You're always stuck
Possession can only exist within procession. What if procession (perception) continues, while the possessed (suggestion) was tricked to ignore it?
keep in mind...each is self-tormented but there is also flow of torment.
If flow forms mind, then keeping in mind implies the self torment of form ignoring flow. Keeping implies taking into possession what procession was giving.
Death is not to be feared by common people because it represents change.
Common implies stagnation during change. Representation aka responding to presented action implies each unique form of adaptation.
Fear (and hope); common and people implies holding onto while ignoring change.
to invite a demon
Demon aka dai (to divide) mon (to provide) doesn't require invitation for it's nature which provides division to each being.
It's angel aka angle (difference in direction between intersecting lines) which requires invitation from a consenting being towards a suggesting being aka from ones choice to a chosen one.
sign a contract
Ones again...consenting to a suggestion implies the contract which establishes angels/angles of attack. Provided (mon) division (dai) doesn't contract together, but sets apart.
slavery
Common implies slavery to sovereign...
Life energy is gods energy.
God WAS energy before internal separation gives life power...suggesting one another what energy IS drains power from one another.
It’s what keeps
God; energy; change GIVES...those who ignore are TAKING from one another to KEEP in possession, thereby becoming possessed.
Demons
Dai (to divide) mon (to provide) implies singularity aka God the provider dividing/divining each being within..plurality aka commonality tempts one to ignore that.
same person
SON implies same sound; PER implies each different instrument within.
always ask for consent
Consent can only be given by free will of choice...giving it binds free will of choice.
you're recorded
Record implies ones response to a cord aka to bondage. Ones consent becomes bound into consensus, which permits another to play the cords like a marionette aka like a puppet on a string.
The mass consensus towards "coronavirus" is stronger than anyone's complaint against it.
lawyer
There's only natural law...a lawyer aka a representative of artificial laws works for a client aka one who lives under the patronage of another aka a slave willingly bending to a master.
Nature doesn't favor beings bending to one another...nature forces law through this injustice of shirking response-ability onto another.
Hammer without a head...
counting the same
a) Whoever counts was differentiated from one another before choosing to count together. Being implies analysis; counting implies synthesis. If a being chooses to count; then another being was permitted to hold accountable.
b) Only within same (inception towards death) can difference (life) come into being.
get way more
What if way implies all (procession) for each one (potential) within? What if a potential cannot get aka hold in possession without ignoring procession?
the number of points
What if inception sentences life towards point of death aka what if there can be only one point?
hexagon
https://www.etymonline.com/word/hex + https://www.etymonline.com/word/agon
(SARA), claims NASA has made contact
If one touches together (contact), while holding into possession (claim), then one contradicts special division analysis.
the majority of life...will end
Life can only be sustained in-between beginning (inception) and end (death) aka as minor within major...will can be manipulated to ignore this though.
nearly all animals
a) Nearly contradicts all.
b) Animal implies all animation for each animated one within...hence only within animation can one move near or far.
it’s not going to work
All works, which employs each one within. Work implies energy aka internal/inherent power... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/energy
NASA
a) Nasha - "to deceive"... https://biblehub.com/hebrew/5378.htm
b) Notice the snake symbolism (split tongue aka words shaped within sound) and the ouroboros circle (logic) eating itself (reason).
a) Notice that dividing the triangles implies 2x3 aka 33; that six/sex/seco implies "to divide"; that arithmetic opposes geometric; that arithmetic was called tælcræft - "tale-craft", that geo/ge implies the phonetic G aka natures generation of each unit within; that geo (earth; land) in-between upward (air) and downward (water) implies natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater)...
b) Try to discern for self (life) where the beginning (inception) and end (death) of the line are, and where a circle (logic) could be shaped...
c) Notice the geometric cube in the center and that unfolding it shapes a cross aka "across"...
What's getting separated?
Effect within cause; partial within whole; reaction within action; growth within loss; potential within energy; choice within balance; matter within motion; temporal within ongoing...Christ within God.
Your sense of reality into lots of pieces?
Real implies ones response (re) to all (al) aka each one sensing all as a piece within...few cast "lots" to draw many together into a fiction.
Yes, joining implies union.
If so, then why do yes and no fight for separation from each other?
"unit of reaction"...Incoherent phrase.
Unit implies singular...coherence and phrase imply plural. Seeking the latter within the former implies a contradiction within the mind of the singular being seeking.
Reaction aren't sentient
Action signifies reaction, hence enabling sentience by sending input to react to aka all perceivable giving each ones perception sentience.
WORDS LOOK SIMILAR THAT MEANS THEYRE RELATED
Different words can only be shaped within same sound...consenting to the meaning of a suggested word draws a relation aka binding ones choice to a chosen one, and singular consent into plural consensus.
To look/lock implies holding onto aka affixing ones sight, hence few utilizing a screen to project suggestions towards onlookers.
s**...lvst...one up
Nature doesn't censor...it reveals all (perceivable) through each one (perception). As for the Christian perspective: "Judge not lest ye be judged" ~Matthew 7:1
"God implies singularity...joining together implies plurality."...Irrelevant.
Relevance aka a recognizable connection can only be shaped by joining singles together. Nature separates each being from one another...few trick many together with a game of "connect the dots". A dot implies a point aka "end of sentence"...being implies send towards point of death, while being given sentience.
Nature puts them at odds, naturally.
Nature implies singularity; each being a single unit within. Nature evens (inception towards death) odds (life)...few artificially tempt many at odds against one another, while using nature to even them out.
Nature implies even/level/balance...being implies odd/different/choice.
You sure LOOOVEE this "sound" that speech is "within".
Love implies versus hate...that's noise among instruments, while ignoring that sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all" implies silence.
All cannot be in conflict...only each one within can choose to love or hate one another, hence responding to sound implying resonance, while fighting each other implies dissonance.
Notice that taking anything loved into possession turns into hate the longer one holds onto...try it with a beloved cat to learn that lesson really quick.
"Doing so tempts one to ignore natural (sound) for artificial (speech)"...No
Ig-NO-rance...
Whilst making your own
Free-will-of-choice cannot own without contradicting self...any spells broken apart remain open for further analysis, because words are formed within flowing sound.
you TURN ON YOURSELF
For oneself to overcome the internal conflict against YOU (judah) requires one to let go of I AM (jesus).
In other words...claiming self as "me; myself or I" turns into artificial conflict, since natures process cannot be possessed by any potential within.
your word games took the L
Free-will-of-choice only analyzed the game (win vs lose) implied within the "L" another suggested...where's the side taking?
By your logic you're a mason.
a) Logos>logic>reason contradicts implication (if/then)
b) Mason implies amassing (ma) sound (son)...being implies instrument set apart from one another within sound, hence being freed from one another.
Few amass many together by tempting FREE into MA while ignoring SON.
From the Christian perspective...Christ (anointed one) the Son (sound). Amassing things together causes friction, while anointment prevents friction by separation of partials. If God implies engine, then each part within requires anointment to prevent friction.
you believe songs actually make authoritative claims about reality.
a) Only within sound can one sing a song...MTV (masonic tell-a-vision) shapes the sing song to distract the audience from sound, yet just like with spell-craft...the natural moves through the artificial, while those who ignore natural are holding onto artificial.
b) Notice 2.3 billion Christians worldwide and 425 million views of that one song "don't stop believing"...that's how the anti-christ gospel is being spread.
2025 years to reach 2.3 billion vs 425 million since its 2010 upload...and don't even think about the 16 billion views of Baby Shark aka to poke/stir (shark) babylon (baby) towards "it's the end".
c) Author/aug - "to increase"...only during decrease (inception towards death) can there be increase (life), hence being given authorization.
The letter...does
How does one LET? By free will of choice...
WHAT YOU believe.
BELIEVE implies taking into possession; BEING ALIVE implies given potential.
temporary marriage
What about "till death do us apart" isn't temporary?
akin to prostitution
Pro (forward) + stitu (to stand; make or be firm)...being implies forwards (inception towards death) formed (life) aka the offer to indiscriminate sexual intercourse, which is why during natural prostitution; each being represents a John (jehovah has favored) or in German Freier (to be free).
Artificial prostitution is about buying vs selling intercourse, which ignores the natural process of separation by pro-stitu-tion.
Artificial sex is about coming together; natural sex implies sex/seco - "to divide".... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/sex
nikāḥ al-mutʿah
Aka nikāḥ (sexual intercourse) al (all) mutah/mutter (mother)...all of nature giving each being within sexual intercourse.
marriage; contract; fixed
Nature sets each being free from one another within motion...few suggest wedlock (marriage); contraction and attachment (fix) as an artificial inversion of nature to tempt many into mutual self destruction.
Benefits owed...
...versus $38.5 trillion in (((debt)))
Joining implies union
a) Union implies one (uni) action (ion), which separates into each unit of reaction within. Only reactions set apart from one another can choose to join together.
b) Join/joie - "pleasure; delight; bliss", hence to rejoice - "to own, possess, enjoy the possession of"...joining implies falling for temptation, hence getting owned; getting possessed and repossessed by others.
Prime example for joining...sex (seco; to divide). The more one falls for the temptation of lust when joining together, the more one fucks up the sexual divide producing off-spring aka the fruit of ones labors aka the coming into being of another UNIT.
c) God implies singularity...joining together implies plurality.
d) A jew tempts gentiles together by suggesting united states; united nations; united kingdom; soviet union; european union; university; uniformity; universalism; unicode; unicef; universal serial bus; unisex; universal pictures; universal basic income; unilever etc...joining either destroys each unit of being.
"ignoring even"...And why is that a bad thing?
Because it puts good vs bad against one another aka at odds...
"Ignoring even" isn't a coherent phrase
a) Even implies "level/balance"...being implies choice. Cohere aka com (together) haerere (to adhere, stick) implies ones free will of choice stuck in bondage to another.
b) Phrase/phrasis - "way of speech" implies sound as the way within speech can be articulated. Doing so tempts one to ignore natural (sound) for artificial (speech) aka falling for spell-craft...entrance free-will-of-choice analyzing and disassembling crafted spells.
Another L for your word games.
L implies "loser" aka a game in-between wining vs losing...
how to use english right.
Right implies linear; english implies angular...hence the freemasonic use of square (angular english) and compass (circular logic).
stop it
Each being is on a journey (ones path of life)...few suggest "don't stop believing" to tempt many into stopping non-believers, which mutually destroys each others journey.
https://genius.com/Journey-dont-stop-believin-lyrics
F" comes before "ree will of choice"
- Only within dominance can on be free.
- Only within need can there be want/will.
- Only within can one come out of.
- Only within balance can there be choice.
...that's what comes before free will of choice. Also...F implies a letter aka one within all letting another shape letters into words to attach meaning.
guywholikesDjtof2024: "believe is fictitious"
...
I didn't say anything about "applying none" to real life.
DIDN'T aka DID NOTHING...once again a fiction applied to real life.
Even if it did
a) https://www.etymonline.com/word/apply
b) Joining together put things AT ODDS with one another, while ignoring even.
implication is a non-factor.
a) Everything implies each thing...nothing denies everything and thereby implication (if/then).
b) Notice that factor has ACT (action) in it, which implies reaction in reality. Putting an F before ACT implies fictitious action aka a fiction shaped by reaction within action as distraction for one another.
A suggested fact tempts one to hold onto, thereby contradicting action, which cannot be held onto.
c) The use of "is" implies a circular conflict (is vs isn't), which implication (if/then) doesn't have.
for admitting I'm right
a) Right/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/right
b) Right forwards (inception towards death), which admits being (life)... I AM implies a being taking possession over self while ignoring the righteous process.
being right implies
If right; then being. If being; then within the righteous way.
No it doesn't.
Aka "nothing it does nothing"...that's you being tricked by a theorem of propositional logic called "double negation".
Nature shows no such thing (separation).
a) So there's no difference between a beings perception and what nature offers it? If I fart over here, then can you smell it over there or could there be a natural separation of position among being?
b) If you say "thing", then that implies a separation of each thing from one another within everything.
c) Isn't there a separation between show and audience?
d) Aren't yes and no separated from one another?
e) Such implies "alike" one another...so doesn't one have to be separated from one another to judge such and such likeness of one another?
"mother and off spring"...Irrelevant.
Relevance implies relieve, hence the relief a mother feels after the separation of each off-spring. Nature giving each being free will of choice implies a relief of burden; it's choosing to hold onto which reestablishes burden....branding anything "irrelevant" implies the sharing attempt of a self imposed burden aka a sin-tax (syntax).
tangential
Tangent implies "meeting at a point without intersecting"...being implies life sentence moved towards point of death by separation from one another, which allows intersection aka internal sex. Therefore...to be implies divergence. Few suggest tangent to entangle many together.
Absolute implies "free from limitations"...Only in certain contexts.
a) Only implies one and only...not only and "certain contexts".
b) Certain implies the use of ones free will of choice to ascertain aka to suggest an assurance to one another to tempt consent into a binding contract.
In short...certainty tempts free will of choice into bondage.
c) Context implies "to weave together" aka the aforementioned bondage of free will of choice into a binding contract with one another called "consensus".
d) Free implies from balance....balance implies the action limiting reacting choice. Only within balance can there be choice.
Limitations such as...?
Balance. Choice implies in-between balance. Imbalance implies choice within balance choosing to hold onto one side, which establishes the circular conflict against the other side aka imbalance for choice.
info
Aka suggested information tempting one to ignore perceivable inspiration.
proving my claim
a) Proof/prove is in the pudding/putting...nature puts (inception) and pulls (death) being (life) in (living) and out (dying) of existence.
Prove aka pro-bhwo implies "forwarded being"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/prove
b) Claiming implies making a demand, which contradicts the given mandate of heaven from genesis (inception towards death) to revelation (life).
Who is going to know this?
Each one who discerns self within knowledge..which cannot be shared without contradicting SELF discernment.
Who actually believes this?
Knowledge moves through one; beliefs tempt one to hold onto. Believing contradicts knowing.
What buildings are going to be constructed by this?
Knowledge doesn't con (together) struct (structure)...it allows ones self dis (to divide) cern (to perceive) ment (mind).
Building implies division, hence the fruit of ones labors aka each off-spring. Few suggest construction by utilizing free-masonry and mosaic law to tempt many into building artificial constructs/creations/fashions/manufactures/compositions/produce/engineering/developments etc. Holding onto a construct implies idolatry...hence constructing the tower of babel until it collapses upon its foundation yet again.
"The conflict between real vs false only exist within a circle...not within the straight line." You made that up. That's false.
a) Free-will-of-choice sets apart what a jew made up, and what gentiles hold together. Why? Because resisting the temptation to hold together what another made up...sustains free will of choice.
b) Versus/verto - "to turn"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/versus Turning implies circular rotation; being (life) implies linear progression (inception towards death).
c) Drawing a circle implies putting the beginning and end of a line together, which inverts nature setting beginning (inception) and end (death) of line apart (life), hence establishing ones life-line.
d) Up and down aren't in a circular conflict against one another, but represent balance (up/down) for ones choice in-between, and only within linear motion can there be balance (momentum) for choice (matter).
"a circle TURNS on itself"...that's false.
How to draw a circle without beginning turning onto end?
stop confusing matter as in physical matter with matter as in relevancy.
a) Only within motion (inception towards death) can there be matter (life)...other suggest the cessation of motion (stop) to tempt one to deny being moved.
b) Only within ALL can there be physic-AL and ment-AL relevancy aka separation from one another, which con (together) fuse (to melt) contradicts.
What's being speculated about?
Being implies special aka specific (partial) within all (whole)...speculation (conjecture of thinking) with one another tempts one to ignore that, which permits each jew to establish "investment of money upon risk for the sake of profit" among speculative gentiles aka investment banking within the vestige of gentile minds.
What's a vestige? A mark, trace, sign aka an idol of speculation.
How competent you are?
Competence tempts one to compete against one another, while ignoring that all (perceivable) is given to each one (perception) for free will of choice.
none
How does one apply "none" aka "no one" to real life?
apply
Applying implies "joining together"...being implies set apart from one another. How could application be real if nature shows the separation of mother and off-spring at birth?
absolute
Absolute implies "free from limitations", yet free will of choice can only work within limitations, hence ones struggle to choose.
etymological games
Etymo (straight) logic (circular thinking) al (all)...it's when one chooses to ignore straight for circular that the game begins.
The conflict between real vs false only exist within a circle...not within the straight line. Why? Because a circle TURNS on itself.
practice
Practical implies matters (perception) of action (perceivable)...matter consenting to the suggestion of other matter implies speculative.
To practice requires one to resist speculation, which only then grows self discernment. Others exploit speculation with mediation (media) and contemplation (entertainment).
A jew shapes; gentiles hold onto shapes...that's why gentiles fight over labels; while a jew can't be labeled without the label running off.
They are tools...
...used by free will of choice.
No "AI" that I've seen
Your sight represents free will of choice within nature...choosing to look at artifice tempts you to ignore that.
Nature implies the energy which activates each beings re-acting brain. Few suggest conservatism to tempt many to ignore that.
Being implies departure within nature...habit tempts one to ignore that.
Habitually holding onto, while departure within nature implies the exponentially increasing calamity to self, and it's ignoring the natural process for the artificial possession which implies lying to self.
Amassing implies an artificial norm suggested by few who naturally particularize from the masses.
Nature differs each being from one another...any norm summons differences together.
Turing implies within a circle...norms are designed to confine a being mentally (logic) and physically (reason) within a circle, hence turning within self and against one another.
Nature implies linear progression of each being within.
Tone implies the use of modulation and inflection to articulate words within natural sound...neither of which helps one to resist words for sound.
Using tone makes one a competitor to the Pied Piper of Hamelin...it doesn't free the children from the trap.
Nature offers all perceivable to each ones perception...all at once. It's the suggestions by one another which require the drip feeding by consent.
Few suggest what "the world" is, which when consented to, permits few to control many. It's ignoring perception for suggestion, which ruins each being, while being under the control of another.
That's not about control, but about being growth (life) within loss (inception towards death), hence not being able to grasp anything without ignoring the loss of everything.
Intuition implies ones insight (perception)...not what another tempts one to put into self (suggestion).