0
FourteenEightyFour 0 points ago +1 / -1

i dont care if he was a jew, just like i don't care if nick fuentes is a faggot

2
FourteenEightyFour 2 points ago +3 / -1

he mentions "worked in conjunction with CIA" in first clip, then is saying he was shocked to learn that he was actual CIA.

maybe he just assumed he was a contractor of some sort, or simply was in frequent communication with them, without actually being a CIA employee? i think there is sufficient difference in the context to give tucker benefit of the doubt, given that i'm not aware of any other incidents of tucker being greasy/fraudulent in this regard.

for example, from wiki:

"In the summer of 1986, U.S. President Ronald Reagan announced his intention to nominate Carlson as an associate director of the United States Information Agency to succeed Ernest Eugene Pell.

Carlson became director of Voice of America, a U.S. government-funded, state-owned multimedia agency which serves as the United States federal government's official institution for non-military, external broadcasting.[18] It broadcasts 24 hours a day in nearly 50 languages to more than 130 million people around the world, with a full-time staff of 3,000 and a part-time staff of 1,200. Carlson was the longest-serving director in VOA's 50-year history."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Carlson#Voice_of_America

it would only make sense that, in these government positions, he would of course be working "in conjunction with" (aka liasing with) the CIA, frequently, for whatever intelligence operation was at hand.

what tucker says makes sense to me. he would indeed be aware that his father often worked in collaboration with CIA, and not be afraid to say that, while not necessarily learning that he was directly working as part of the CIA until later.

i like nick but he seems to be ignoring the context for this, unintentionally, i hope. you could say it's a matter of semantics, but tucker isn't the one who is committing a semantical mistake here, he was unambiguous in his choice of words imo. "in conjunction with" here can only really mean "collaborating with while still remaining separate from". if you try to extract another meaning from it then you are twisting someone's words i'm afraid.

4
FourteenEightyFour 4 points ago +4 / -0

you rly just gonna sit there and pump out AI slop lol

-1
FourteenEightyFour -1 points ago +2 / -3

they test vehicles in terrain as similar as possible to destination

3
FourteenEightyFour 3 points ago +3 / -0

i was trying to remember the other day what was the genesis of me waking up to the reality of the world and the deception of the media, and i couldn't really put a finger on it at all

but now i remember, it was adam curtis documentaries

3
FourteenEightyFour 3 points ago +4 / -1

name one bad thing about nationalism. i'll wait.

1
FourteenEightyFour 1 point ago +1 / -0

i think you are confusing me with someone else

2
FourteenEightyFour 2 points ago +3 / -1

lol. this board has gone to utter shit these last months, pure nonsense being posted every day

3
FourteenEightyFour 3 points ago +3 / -0

and you can accurately perceive how many are active at any given time from the number of downvotes any post gets that even remotely criticizes israel

2
FourteenEightyFour 2 points ago +2 / -0

it's not just that we aren't ready for it now, I just feel that we are permanently incompatible with it

2
FourteenEightyFour 2 points ago +2 / -0

my instinct tells me to reject AI at every possible step of the way. don't really need to give it a lot of thought

11
FourteenEightyFour 11 points ago +11 / -0

when the jew absolutely detests and loathes something more than anything else on earth (christianity), i'm going to start paying closer attention to it, not reject it.

also, european aryan christians have been perfectly fearsome in the past. our finest hour was never when we were godless, but the opposite, whether it was christian or pagan is irrelevant. it was only when we allowed ourselves to become godless, or become infiltrated with atheists and satanists, or allow the church as an institution to become corrupt with unlimited power, that we became spiritually weak.

lastly, there are as many interpretations of christianity as there are christians in the world. because deep down the church as an institution is irrelevant, real faith in a higher being resides inside us, in whatever shape it may take, guiding us hand in hand with our own aryan intuition and unique perspective of the world around us.

view more: Next ›