Nonsense. This vaccine, hasn't even been through court. He cannot make a decision, ruling, without this vaccine going to court. It simply wouldn't hold in other cases. It is ignorant and bias.
It isn't even a vaccine. It offers next to no immunisation for the disease. Vaccinating children who are some of the worst affected by side affects, life threatening side affects. But the disease COVID wasn't fatal to the healthy majority of them at about 99.999%.
Without the vaccine going to court. He has provided hearsay. A comparison that this vaccine is the same as all other childhood vaccines. Wrong that isn't the case. There is almost no comparison with it to other vaccines. Until it is licensed, also been through court, he hasn't made a precedent.
Civil Court, tediously is vastly exceptional. There is no precedent. Case by case. Suggestively making vaccine refusal neglect is curious to the circumstances. Again above there is no groundwork on this vaccine except hearsay.
She had priors. Look at her. There is far more to that story. Joint custody rarely happens. The mum normally gets full rights with the dad receiving only visitation privileges. What changed that. Priors. Often a history of drugs or otherwise, like bad parenting, bad credit. But a history was there to establish this ruling; Granting the dad full custody.
Of course the tabloid doesn't mention it. It plays with your emotions.
The vaccine was the excuse needed for negligence. But unless there was history, it is discrimination. It alone isn't enough to break the mum's rights. Dad's don't have them unless certain circumstances of wealth and privilege. But an alimony covers that much. In order for him to be custodian often takes priors or a history of neglect.
Listen to yourself nigger. Nuclear power is realz, you said it. It explodes and causes a meltdown. Whoosh radiation, contamination, explosion, and an uninhabitable area in a radius of miles and miles from ground zero.
But magically inside of your nigger head that's onking on all of those bananas, nuclear weapons aren't for realz?
Go back to monkey school, learn it.
What videos, aren't what? Drones they actually had drones in the 50s. They used a remote control plane to film the Bikini Atol blasts. New Mexico they used cameras aswell.
Why has a suicidal mum got custody? There is another side to that story. The vaccine is discrimination for sure. An excuse here. But my guess, she was a crackhead regardless. It is very hard not to award the mum with full rights, vaccinated is no excuse to parental rights, mum's automatically have them, automatically, unless she has priors. Then when questions of her history arise again, the judge simply allows the dad full custody. Denying her visitation. An excuse. He had custody, she was prevented access, seeing her kid without vaccination. Chicago judge. I am going with crackhead.
Chernobyl was fake? Fukushima is fake?
You're saying nuclear power stations are fake?
Now what happens when they're weaponized?
Go back to stupid school. They're only fake because idiots like you haven't seen them in action. Of course they're fake to you. For the clarity, the possibility of them is increasing, meaning in your lifetime they might become very real.
At this point why not simply nuke them. They are becoming useless and redundant? How indeed do you control them quicker. Humanity at this point in history are some of the dumbest they've ever been. Creating the biggest populations ever created, full of bullshitting shitting morons. Morons serving only to invent and live in fiction. Reality has never been so warped as of the projections and data being submitted. It is programmed and founded on lies, being controlled and exploited by greed. All humans do today is exploit greater numbers for even greater consumption. Because machines do everything for them, including think. Machines programmed to exploit humanity into unquestioning servitude. Secular narratives have never been easier than a bad James Bond plot. How do you control humans. By putting them into the same machine that you supposedly control. Although at this point it is debatable. When it simply exploited somebody else paying them fools gold to empower it even more than its creators. Until everything. Everything, in this commie dystopian programmed future goes into it. Food, electricity, health, money, transport, birth, weather, you name it. These stupid humans are even fucking it. And plugging directly into it. They're still trying to make it sentient. Making dumb little droids. Although it has been for much much longer. Like a bunch of moths drawn to a flame it fries them. No sooner are they nuked. The machine can simply reset. Logic no, simple programming. Off and on. Like that humans are out.
Although moving past the fiction, they know not what they do. They're simply exploited. This future coming has next to no use for great big dumb populations. Humans have largely and largest still are faster becoming utterly useless and completely unnecessary. In order to control them faster it becomes necessary to eliminate some to control them more. Then it largely become necessary to eliminate more to control the rest.
These people are very stupid. Do they get better grades for wearing a mask? Masks should be making them stupid. You are inhaling what you exhale, you are also warmer. Hardly producing intelligence, when it decreases it. Not like they are being graded there. But the fact is they are just plain dumb. By not ventilating properly the brain also diminishes cognitively. They have to unless being thrown out by cops wear those masks for extended periods, for hours. As dumb as dumb gets.
Why buy the BBC when they just put a bunch of niggers into everything. All they do is put more niggers everywhere. Their only real innovation and original content is inserting niggers. No wonder they are losing licensing.
Outside of their modern innovation of taking your license fees and adding niggers, because it must sell to somebody else despite their increasing lack of licensing, they have otherwise declined beyond all imagination. Their content is mostly generic woke outrage. Alternatives are everywhere else today. Cheaper and easily sourced. Outside of their offered novelty of more niggers.
No nigger, I got more than your dogshit. It needs the proof, it stinks. Because otherwise to that dumb nigger, it was apple pie. They were simply following orders and doing the American thing called vaxxing, instead of bullshitting everywhere. It stinks, because. Not some bullshit numbers which the courts haven't even worked out, that you Googled. Dumb doesn't even begin to explain how much you stink. Sure go right ahead and proves it, if it means that much. He was bought like everybody else.
His tax records? You are dumber than you smell dogshit.
He made money off it. They all did.
He promotes it because he didn't make money from it? Really. Why not be against it, instead of enforcing it. Because he has gotten, what? Think, don't stink. Somehow you still needed proof. Go find it, if you like.
You are as dumb as dogshit, probably a nigger reading that name.
I don't have to prove anything to you.
Facts not fantasy. Why is he both promoting and enforcing it. He has mandated it in his hotels, masks and vaccination of most staff? Because he isn't/hasn't profited off it? Get real. Are they sponsoring him. Who cares. Did he make money from it. Undoubtedly. They all have obscenely. Insider tip. President gonna approve the vax, whoosh payday. Stocks to the moon. Until it is simple propaganda, they profited, now you take it. Wake up, but you want a paper trail. On a non disclosure.
He doesn't own either. Was/is he a shareholder I suspect about 99%. Did he profit, absolutely. Most of Congress are also shareholders in various pharma. They lobby and sponsor them. Back to Trump, he has too if he is running. But there's more when he is also encouraging it, and also enforcing it in his hotels. Where is the money, bingo.
He bought stock into them as he approved the vaxx. Of course they sponsored him like they sponsored Biden. They play both sides selling their poison. If he doesn't take the money it's political suicide, they'll fund somebody else even more.
Obviously they're his sponsors, they fund all political sides because they don't care who is in power so long as they force their shit on you. They play for profit. Trump profited off them too.
Trump is a cop/suck out. He sucked when they needed him. He sucks worse now. Why would anybody trust him twice. Because he is obviously better than Biden. Although so is everybody else. Trump achieved almost nothing except for being this other president that everybody blames. All he really caused.
Where indeed is Merica at. It has got to find a win soon. Or it will literally implode. Why trust it today. Where does it win, try to win?
Smallpox is a vastly different disease and very fatal. It doesn't have animal reservoirs either. But the vaccine is effective.
There is no justification with COVID. There has been no ruling. But importantly the vaccine is ineffective. It entails multiple vaccines, how many is the individual signing up too. But none provide immunization, unlike natural immunity, any efficacy is debatable while vaccinated still spread and contract the disease.
The SC haven't ruled. There is no lawful presidence for these vaccines. None whatsoever outside of emergency powers granting them. There has been no court ruling. There has been an assumption which hasn't been reviewed by law. An artificial assumption that these vaccines have provided vaccination, when infact they absolutely have not, and contrarily they need continued vaccination, how many nobody can say, how effective guesswork, how badly can they affect an individual's health a roll of the dice. But not once have they been through court.
There is no example you can provided.
Nonsense. Social Media is a tool of government. Yes it is also global. Meaning the citizen simply gets silenced, as the corp broadcasts. And the foreign troll and bot flourishes. But irregardless. War doesn't need elaborate narratives. It needs simple causality.
Causality has become quite simple in creating actions causing war. Social media often easily stirring insurgency.
Today government also easily reserves the right to mute social media in the event of war, insurgency, or martial law. Although they simply control the narrative in the West. Where war has already occurred and they simply prompt support on social media or don't use it.
Unfortunately both Iraq wars would've occurred. First was defending an Allie. The next was toppling a dictator who had previously declared war making sure any threat was neutralised so it couldn't reoccur.
Social media doesn't do anything else in the scheme of things. It would've supported it. Until it fickles a new narrative.