Nonsense. This vaccine, hasn't even been through court. He cannot make a decision, ruling, without this vaccine going to court. It simply wouldn't hold in other cases. It is ignorant and bias.

It isn't even a vaccine. It offers next to no immunisation for the disease. Vaccinating children who are some of the worst affected by side affects, life threatening side affects. But the disease COVID wasn't fatal to the healthy majority of them at about 99.999%.

Without the vaccine going to court. He has provided hearsay. A comparison that this vaccine is the same as all other childhood vaccines. Wrong that isn't the case. There is almost no comparison with it to other vaccines. Until it is licensed, also been through court, he hasn't made a precedent.

Civil Court, tediously is vastly exceptional. There is no precedent. Case by case. Suggestively making vaccine refusal neglect is curious to the circumstances. Again above there is no groundwork on this vaccine except hearsay.