▲ 5 ▼
Ep0ch 5 points ago +5 / -0

Getting so tired of online press and social media platforms. Where there is no law on blatant misinformation from the press. But it thinks to police the public for the same, often innocently.

I have seen so much nonsense being pressed on Ukraine. Stories that aren't factual. Not verified. Are lies. Yet all of 5 minutes ago, it was an inquisition against people questioning COVID. Fact checkers and lawsuits deployed.

Again I don't care. Not picking a side until I am in war. Then I pick my nation. But the bias being spewed is unfactual and the majority is from social media and online press. Sources people wouldn't find in store bought papers, because it would be sued. Falling under national laws. But somehow nobody can sue social media. But it can sue the public, and perm ban it for simply challenging the narratives spewed which are often outright lies.

No I don't want censorship either. I want fairness. I don't want it banned. I want free speech. So people can discuss it. Currently there's only outright hypocrisy and disgusting manipulation. It's utterly skewed.

I cannot even form an opinion on this. Some random twitter. Yet yesterday every online paper ran with it was destroyed. Posting that now. It is obviously a ban to cover the press lying. Or do they get the same treatment? Ban every shit spreading online paper. Ban the platform for not fact checking it. Or simply let everybody else challenge it and the rest of their abuse? https://old.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/t57r4t/the_moment_zelensky_hears_about_the_bombing_of/

Look at it echo a lie. Either it allows every opinion so people can object and form facts. Or take it down completely. Sadly the parasites running it only want to manipulate opinions to hide their lies.

by pkvi
▲ 3 ▼
Ep0ch 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't understand your point? Didn't Azerbaijan just reclaim land from Armenia? Didn't it just have a war to seize Armenian land.

Somehow it's going to vote against an allie doing the same or similar?

▲ 3 ▼
Ep0ch 3 points ago +3 / -0

A Cold War is faster becoming Hot.

Fuck that other noise. When policies sooner collide what actually comes next?

They can sanction until the cows go home, edging and inciting it. But it's the direct intervention that is going to force something much much worse. Policy working in complete opposites. Until less options are ultimately left. There is a real troubling trend that magically there's another unicorn. There is some other policy to put that genie back into the bottle. Instead of it forcing a larger showdown.

▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

I keep saying it didn't matter. If you had credible Intel or not so credible Intel that Iraq as a nation who had just attacked another nation was trying to acquire them. Wouldn't you simply remove that threat rather then wait until they do.

The actual facts are Syria, Libya all had WMDs. So do other nations in the region not disclosed. Others may have other nations protection. Where are American bases these at times might have capacity. Iraq had some biological weapons regardless.

The entire non WMDs, was simply a presumed change in policy. Withdraw not. To go back in ISIS. All it did was offer the good cop. Because the bad cop had done that.

Of course conspiracy has seized on it and we have since been flooded with apologists, and phobists. But it's not like it wasn't, inevitable. It was simple causality.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Stop reading twitter. Stop reading Reddit. Stop watching the news. Simple.

Not like you can do anything about a war in Ukraine. If you joined up like you possibly can. Not sure if they're paying for your travel some places are if you had experience. You'd just be sent to the front line. Because Volunteers get to go first. More human shields.

The social media news is almost 90% bullshit. The stories are literally absurd for the sake of appealing to absurdity. There are some facts misplaced into skewed propaganda. Understandable and when it's network coverage it tends to be much better with the narratives run. Unavoidable when a national broadcast. But avoid social media. Reddit is full of literal assholes like Twitter and Facebook. They literally shit all over people where they have obvious agendas to bait users for the sake of flagging them by submitting content that is bullshit.

He is comparing coverage to former World Wars and other globe changing events. People regular people don't even care. Ask them. They only care when it matters. When the nation goes to war, or war hits home, or when it affects their lifestyles. Of course many are programmed by any information seen never questioning much else. So who are all the other assholes on social media? Literal shills, entire troll farms, where the public rarely gets to speak unless it also echoes. It has flagged everything and everybody else.

I think in the past there was also far more free speech. Let's rewind before social media. Less bias. Sometimes more awareness. Due to a past history and society's shaped by war. Let's go back to the 30s or even the 50s. Awareness of war its meanings involved. Instead of twitter and the sheltered societies watching superheroes. But it has completely changed today with social media. Literally the dumb leading the blind because the deaf shouldn't hear. Programming on a scale designed to completely manipulate.

▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Haha teasing. Eastern yes. But as stated bullshit. Although problematic. Who knows what that objective is.

Okay Ukraine is the largest Country in Europe because Russia technically isn't. So it makes sense it would attack from its battle positions dominating from any flanks advancing forwards. Except in warfare there is also strategy. If you want to force surrender you must surround cut off and exert pressure. By sealing an enemy in and further firing at will. Not quite at will. Whoever he is. But you don't allow a gravvy train to keep reinforcing. In that regard the assumed speculation holds. Half by geographical river or some other imaginary line. Except now that Russia are in the doghouse. What exactly have they got to lose apart from being the presumed liberators?

Obviously they'll push from the flank. But at which point didn't they send enough detachments to enclose. It's still week one, no rush. There was no real rush anyway despite contrary opinion. Once committed what indeed is its objective?

Anybody can suggest once Kyvi goes the West will yield. Speculation.

▲ 3 ▼
Ep0ch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Because it's bullshit and it is its Eastern half you what's it.

The blue line is dated speculation that still holds some vague intention. But objectively is guesswork.

Guesswork still basing a premise on the initial invasion positions. Perhaps baffling when decisively the border being sealed squeezes an opponent's ability to reinforce and resupply and propagate. But the size of Ukraine is a logistic nightmare, without support lines can easily be overrun. Although seemingly it's drawing an enemy in while also hoping it surrenders. Tediously.

Who knows that objective. Except at this point those old lines speculated might as well be doodles. Russia has nothing to lose and more to gain. Why take half?

Obviously it will also dominate its flank quickest.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why are Argentina invading Venezuela? Lol. I'd actually have to see it to believe it. But anything for funding. The next thing is they're off to the Falklands.

How to solve a problem like the Contra. Create Venezuela.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yawn.

You're connecting it from a different perspective. Not necessarily the way they see it. Or what those stakes are. Or the intention and objective.

I don't have those answers either. I am not Russian.

You're debating the dubious timing colliding into NWO programming. Don't care. Let me know when it matters. Because what matters is a war that risks going hot. Only somehow you still thinks it's fake?

Another thing you're largely missing is Western intentions where you're still in the realms of conspiracy instead of attempted advantage

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Network turned off settings. It refused to submit data, after I posted. It might have been from previous. But I really don't like bullshit. It's the first time I've seen that error on this device. I restarted. Error cleared.

Error read, data disabled. Little stupid icon popped up.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. What profits, profits. Outside of quick profit. Are there other movies. Undoubtedly. But it isn't what this is completely about. They'd also profit just about anywhere else. It's how business is done. Yes perhaps a conspiracy due to how any business is handled. But it makes no difference in the scheme of it.

What are the actual stakes?

▲ 3 ▼
Ep0ch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sure enough the urban flare reactors are in overdrive. They must have committed a warcrime hitting the holocaust memorial. And the city's base of operations. A travesty. Better send in the ground troops. Almost what this is shaping into. Few more tears to go.

I just got nuked for that comment. Literally tracked. Let me reiterate I take no side. I am not fighting. If I was I support my country.

But from that perspective a human shield is a human shield. What is the conscription. Where is its HQ. Go bother somebody else cunts. Simple discussion.

▲ 3 ▼
Ep0ch 3 points ago +3 / -0

My sides. Seriously what? If nukes had flown. We all would hear about it.

▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

No small wonder

▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Utilities are always a pyramid scheme. They always increase in price, and they always generate more demand. Pure money. Easy stocks. Vultures tend to score these the first. They made Bolivians pay for rainwater. Literally.

But yeah you could be right about laundering off the books. But it doesn't necessarily need it. Because utilities profit.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

England? Europe?

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shale largely. Black Sea. Most countries have some Gas and can frack for more. There are always potential finds. But it's relatively marginal by all former comparisons. Their output cannot even sustain their demands, they import a 1/3. I don't think the WIKI is wrong there.

I think a lot of vultures swooped in, utilities are so profitable, constant demand, and always increasing bills, easy money.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ukraine has almost zero Gas. It largely came from Crimea and Russian pipelines. Outside of that possibly a few potential reserves, but they're insignificant in comparison to the other sources of Crimea, and Gazprom.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_gas_in_Ukraine

They seemingly import even more than they produce. Of course it doesn't stop profiteers.

▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Russian Federation is full of Muslims. That's a battalion and possibly even Chechen?

You're arguing what here, that if Ukraine also doesn't contain Muslims? Try again.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not on my feed it is Putin Orban at that time stamp. Containing very outdated information. Please post the segment. I have seen the imgur. But not on that feed.

I am not watching 15 mins either tried sliding through couldn't see it.

Dunno what that's wearing. I dunno why somebody not properly attired is representing the USA. But it may have been a face visor with a mike, earpiece or god knows.

Found it. It's a picture of a ninja turtle. Or WTF. It has that crown on its head from the Frog King. It's raising its human hand, but what did it say, something froglike obviously.

▲ 3 ▼
Ep0ch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Because it would just get banned and censored and replaced with a gay orgy.

Seriously did you think they'll actually let you play VR beatem ups. Not unless they're a boxing Sim to then further go and ban boxing. No more head injuries. Only snowflakes in their safe spaces.

▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why am I watching old news, it is not current? Why am I watching 15 odd minutes of shitty outdated information. Under a title that makes 0 sense. It's like somebody with serious hallucinations and possible schizophrenia wrote. What demon or alien, where?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›