by pkvi
▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Troon currency.

▲ 8 ▼
Ep0ch 8 points ago +8 / -0

It must not be Mars, again. Hahaha. It's the Rover shoot. Release drone into desert out of the little tunnel. Don't film tunnel whatever you do. Doh

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes they bred people to die. They would brazenly sacrifice them. They were so convinced it was for their gods. Society relished in it like in the arena. Or even today it still does. Acts of tribal law. Where human sacrifice occurs and is practiced in Africa as well as in other nations.

But okay, simple for the seasons, like the wickerman. Their gods, and locals believed it provided a blessing, it occurred all the way up to christianity. Abraham's blessing. It wasn't just for the harvest. But okay let's suggest the Temple of Aphoridity, it probably had whorehouses surrounding it. It did in Pompeii. Who were the whores, slaves. Literally. Chained and shackled into little rooms. Fucked daily as a sacrifice to the godess of fucking. Does it get more perverse of course it does much worse where the temple maidens and slaves are sacrificed prior to war and to bless voyages or whatever they wanted. Their gods decreed or they delighted in it. Druid festivals broke virginity by an orgy, or a gang bang on equinox, or whatever. Find fertility festivals today where they do weird shit, in Africa FGM. Or their bullshit. Nothing like in those days where they relished it. Until you find Sati burnt any wives and daughters when their husband died. They accepted this. Or there's the brazen bull, it wasn't torture, if it was an offering. Perhaps it became punishment after. But going back to the Minoans they had the labyrinth, when they did, they offered the temple maidens, slaves, and their warriors.

You struck one point without understanding that depth. It was practiced everywhere. It was still practiced after the one god, Christian, Jewish, Muslim. It is still practiced today despite being outlawed. Various tribal practices and religions.

No sadism is wiring gone wrong. It has been debated what causes it. They hate this shit. Because it causes doubt on other perversions, or fetishes. But what most find offensive and disgusting, they find delighting. Could you imagine above being even worse. It gets much worse. Aztec sacrifices and medieval torture. After society has been otherwise normal, godly, or at least taught law and principles. Wouldn't it be repulsive, imagine watching a beating heart torn from a human chest, and the population celebrating it. What if it was your daughter's, she was a temple maiden about to be sacrificed blessing something. You literally would be disgusted, emotionally tormented. Wiring then in times of extreme cruelty was different to your utter horror now. They had no empathy, no emotional block. Instead they celebrated your daughter's beating heart being ripped out. So what makes a sadist. Power and cruelty, from different wiring gone wrong, often trauma. Until they find pleasure in it, and it no longer becomes a choice. The same with cannibalism.

But is wokism any better? The human mind has the capacity to love as much as too hate. It won't change either. No matter what is forced. What is forced causes its own concerns. Look at it now. It simply implodes.

▲ 6 ▼
Ep0ch 6 points ago +6 / -0

Suspended for whatever excuse they want. It wasn't for breaking rules. It was just to ban, or cause it. A manifesto is a ban. How does it incite? A madman wrote it. Did he have a point. Not by committing atrocity. It sounds bullshit anyway. Completely bullshit. This is why it's banned. He literally didn't write that. Who writes reddit and 4chan? Think. Nobody. They wouldn't profile where they gained their expertise, it defeats the point. Instead it calls out what? More places to ban.

Literally reeks of fuckery. It always does. It always has another agenda. Why right now do we see this shit? It is probable, it's always probable, but it causes something else. Think. Reading that shit. Have 3 guesses. It's directly tying into an opposition narrative on what issues. It has a few from abortion, disinformation, plus simple against, and others. It stinks worse than a Troon cunt.

▲ 7 ▼
Ep0ch 7 points ago +7 / -0

Banning opposition parties is called banning democracy. It's more corrupt then what supposedly started their resistance.

It is war so there is an excuse to consolidate power. It has emergency directives. Regardless of war, prosponing parliament, it still had been elected.

He's a Nazi. Banning opposition is tyranny. You've just worded it like the inquisition, it is. Literally are you Russian, torturing until the signed confession. All you did was not support him torturing you. There's only one party, his. It tortures the others for their signed confessions of treason.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yawn, nuclear winter is vastly different to there being no sun at all. No the globe doesn't go completely dark. Even the poles have the Sun for limited durations, even toxic Venus has the Sun, not necessarily penetrating through its clouds. But it still causes that Planet to exist. If we don't have the Sun, our atmosphere changes. It would vastly change without our carbons. Carbons wiped out in an Ice-age. Nitrogen our main gas, level, would plummet. Who can even calculate it. Because prior to this concept, our geography has changed. Vastly changed. In order to adapt to it, there is no accounting for it. Only a suggestion of what if. Often stupidly. They live on Antarctica because there is the Sun. But the tectonic plates would bring their own catastrophe. Catastrophe so violent you could make something here and there, and what's to suggest it isn't wiped out.

Yawn. Literally no understanding. You have suggested something contrary. It is insane. It doesn't formulate. It is incorrect.

BTW I am far too private, to go make channels getting me banned. I have acquired a lifetime of knowledge by experience and assimilation through study, or the logical debate from it. I am banned instantly on Reddit by my IP on many subs connected to the press. They fucking hate my guts because I challenge their bullshit, instead of simply agreeing with it. I am not banned by the press, only a cabal of freaks thinking their comments do fuck all. But I wouldn't think to put my face out there. When I have, it gets the freaks attacking it. I have no desire to get banned off youtube. I don't make bullshit, I debate it.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Moloch is a children's story. A fable. He wasn't even called that. His name in ancient languages is called something else, serving something different, other than just baby sacrifices. Because gods demanded far more. Human sacrifice had specific purposes, also having cruelty beyond imagination, the imagination of the power that harnessed them for their rituals. Cruelty, where they often bred people to die. They believed when they did, it served higher purposes. Often a simple delight of the power using them.

Adrenchrome is also largely fables. It has a medical use, adrenaline, not the use of some other grail. I doubt it causes cruelty. Cruelty, sadism realeses its own highs, like pleasure causes them. Cruelty like pleasure consumes. Has it been marketed into a drug, causing cruelty, like pleasure perhaps has? I doubt it. What a sadist finds pleasure, would causes a normal brain to react in disgust, it wouldn't be pleasurable. They have different wiring, hemispheres damaged by cruelty, or developing a craving for it through damage or power. Although perhaps they share the same endorphins? Wouldn't any drug work the same on anybody else having medical uses, or highs, etc? Both Nazis and Berserkers used drugs, but these were likely for limiting pain, and causing compliance, becoming ritual and ceremony.

Perhaps there are entire tribes, cults, or fetishes dedicated to cannibalism. But cannibalism is mainly about power, consuming an enemy to cause fear, turned into fetishes, it made stronger, because it does, the craving feeds, consuming, giving it power. Perhaps that meat is sweeter to the insane craving it. But it's because power can, it does, until it became their choice. Also because it was an easy food source, an easier food source in war, or famine.

I laugh at this topic's fables. If it occurs it doesn't like that. When it does it's because power uses it for its reasons like blackmail, ritual, and because it craves in its unearthly delights.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're insane. It's like something scooped out your brain. You think because there's a Sun. Without the Sun you wouldn't even be able to debunk the Sun. See what you're doing? Don't you get it.

Get me banned. Hahaha. You're so far up your asshole it's created a wormhole that has shat your brains out. What little of them left you're so keen to crap them out.

You think because there's a Sun. But it's clear you don't think. You're bullshiting your brains out.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Without the Sun for 2000 years. Nothing lives. We effectively have no Atmosphere. This Planet is wiped out. Every planet in our solar system gets the Sun in even tiny doses. Without a Sun they'll collide. It is the source for our entire solar system, specifically this planet our Earth. It lives because we have a Sun.

Hyperspeculation. No it isn't. It's a simple fact. The Sun doesn't switch off. If it does we die and very badly. Nothing survives. You couldn't calculate it. There would be no where safe. Tech for space like Solar panels. What.

Dumbass you have no source get it. Now duck off back to the asylum where you belong.

I don't want to try too explain the rest of it to you, outside of pointing out your fundamental flaw. The Sun doesn't go dark. But the planet theoretically can. Nuclear winter. It hasn't accounted for no Sun. There is a smaller difference. It is a colossal difference, when it accounts for the impact on our solar system. That impact is full on collision.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yawn, codswallop. Literally nonsense.

You must have taken a few minutes linking that shit. But you haven't linked anything.

Real simple question without the Sun for 2000 years, what happens? No atmosphere. Nothing lives. Apart from some kind of crabs, fish living in our depths without light. The planet's tectonic plates also go full blown mental. Nobody lives underground. The planet has sunk and froze. Violent eruptions, and earthquakes. Without the Sun for 1000s of years. There is no survival. Yes the Sun can get theoretically blocked out for smaller durations, but even Antarctica gets the Sun.

Elites could survive in Space. No they couldn't. There is no saving them underground in the event of the Sun going dark for 2000 years.

Stop being a dumbass.

▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Troons are reptiles

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am not sure about that. In fact I am sure that's wrong, the younger dryas, prior supervolcano, at least twice in the last 100,000 years. It was debated recently in fact. How many years between violent geology or impact. Not sure what they concluded or if it was correct, but it's much less than 80k.

Romans 5th generation. No they usurped the current paradigm as in all dating has been done because of them. Where they're responsible for a point of reference, setting the past back to around 5000 years prior to Christ. It was never like this until the reformation. Where it was the work of two leading historians, giving us AD, and BC and the dumb ages of stone, bronze, and iron.

Stonehenge is a modern fraud. I simply used the Romans to suggest of its impossible occurrence. They destroyed all other British druid sites brutally.

I have up voted your attempt, but it's lacking some knowledge.

▲ 3 ▼
Ep0ch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Gut explosion. Like feeding rats cola? Fart fire. Either belch or fart, and boom. It ignited from nearby candles or fire. Most were obese and alcoholics, drinking in those days moonshine, higher percentages.

Perhaps there's more to it?

Or they're pyromanics producing a combustible acid that burnt them very quickly causing no other damage. Plenty of skin types are very oily. Others where the body doesn't breakdown hydrogen.

But no other damage apart from the greasy soot left all over the walls, and partial limbs remaining, suggests an acidic reaction, possibly igniting from other nearby sources. Look to the right propane lamp?

▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, prediction, it wasn't apparently identified when he made his prediction. Although that is abhorrently speculative. Speculative because they have known for well over a century of increasing anomalies fitting former predulivian civilization narratives. Civilization wiped out in ancient calamity, from the bible to Atlantis and almost every ancient culture spanning the planet, have all had stories of it.

Yet those that profit have insisted on something contrary. Today with far more exploration it is becoming impossible to refute. It has even been effectively proved with the Greenland crater. It had been debated prior to Casey. Where that evidence was less than today. Anomalies increasing into fact. What occurred. It has been constantly rejected for even more Dinosaur consumption, and evolutionary subhumanism. Regardless of it fitting into the modern paradigm or not, it is abundantly clear ancient calamity occurred, civilization was advanced enough to have been affected by it.

▲ 3 ▼
Ep0ch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Plenty of other roads coming up recently.

https://strangesounds.org/2021/05/mysterious-stone-road-pacific-ocean-sakhalin-photo.html

https://www.megalithicbuilders.com/north-america/bahamas/bimini-bimini-road

https://www.messagetoeagle.com/stunning-discovery-ancient-underwater-road-adriatic-sea-traces-lost-civilization/

http://www.adaderana.lk/news/44777/scientists-claim-adams-bridge-likely-man-made

In answer to the topic. I utterly doubt natural geology whenever I hear it. There are far too many ancient underwater ruins, and specifically roads above that are quite speculative. I would be here all day linking them. Sadly they still cling to a narrative that is under much larger question.

▲ 3 ▼
Ep0ch 3 points ago +3 / -0

I am not Russian. You dumb shill. I do limited research to debunk lies on a conspiracy forum. I gain an opinion by trying to find information. It is objective. It isn't subjective to Ukraine. It's a war there are two sides.

You airing Ukrainian nonsense so happens to be the biggest lie. Real simple question what have they won? Nothing is that answer. They have only lost. Sure they have won some funding and arms. It has done nothing. Not yet in any event. It doesn't matter if they make limited gains. Ironically they lose them somewhere else. They have lost far more territory. It doesn't matter if they kill a few soldiers fighting. They have lost far more. Entire terrorities the size of other countries. Their entire coastline with it their oil and gas and ports all but one surrounded by islands under Russian control, and Russian waters full of battleships and subs firing at them. And territories under Russian control full of an opposing army.

Kharkiv could be taken later. Strategically it's right on the border with a big highway to Kiev. But it wasn't a current objective. Instead it was simply bombarded and cut off. Them rushing to rescue it, is a cartoon. Whackamole. They're still bombarding it. Retaking it costs even more. Think before you air garbage. It's laughable.

▲ 4 ▼
Ep0ch 4 points ago +4 / -0

You're literally a Peak retard. Ukraine hasn't won anything. Not a single thing. Factually. Away from stupid propaganda.

You see Russia could lose 50k, 100k, etc men and still win.

How you ask. Because last time we all checked Russia has gained territory. What they aren't telling you. Ukraine has no Coastline. It held the majority of its oil and gas. 1 port left, and it is in Russian waters. It has taken Kherson Oblast and that one alongside it to the right going towards Donbass Oblast. Luhansk Oblast is virtually taken. Donbass is still fighting along the fortified Ukrainian line. It is caving. When it goes and the rest of the Donbass is secured and the other territory committed, Ukraine has almost nothing of any significant value. It only has daily debts running miles high. As Russia continues to turn it into a war zone and rumble. It's heavy resource production halted, its coastline irrelevant.

Kharkiv wasn't much of a current objective. Ukraine rescuing it, hasn't done shit. It was cut off before. It is still within massive bombardment. And it has largely been turned into colossal debt, by repairing the smouldering rubble. Won what?

Ukraine has done nothing but lose. The press needs to convince everybody else why they're paying sky high inflation, and importantly justify even more arms shipments. Ironically winning back terrority bombarded while continuing to lose even more territory, is a much bigger joke. It's hilarious that you keep posting this shit.

I am no Russian, but I am rolling around on the floor laughing everytime the press airs this crap. Who is it convincing? It's pure trash. Like look at Kharkiv. What's left of it. But Ukraine has won it back? Russia never took it.

Sure there's some dead Russians. It's a war obviously. How many Ukrainians looking at that city, its second largest. It has managed too. Don't ask. Those bombs are still hitting it.

Come back with the news. Not bullshit. Let us know when Ukraine has actually stopped something else.

The facts first instead of mindless propaganda. The worse this escalates. The worse it gets for everybody. Look at the current prices, and globally as the stock markets jitter daily. More arms shipment increase any risk of direct war. Can Ukraine deal. No chance currently. But it really isn't winning objectively. And it won't stop here. It doesn't stop with a few dead Russians fighting in a much larger geopolitical war. It escalates into you tell me at the going rates of fallout? Fallout like the prices shooting through the roof. Keep them up, daily, where is everybody else at? Seriously.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Weren't their gods the sun, and seasons.

There wasn't one god until an emperor declared the other god's false. It was only to be their god. Then the mortals killed him. Because he wasn't god. They decided it was best to appoint god's messenger. So he could tax them for it.

As far as that event, there are a few natural and celestial events which can cause this. Volcanoes, and planetary impact.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

What does pausing take over do. Think. It causes the price to drop. It gained on him buying it.

Perhaps it leaves room for negotiations on how he runs it. Dubious it's only about the costs and funding. The only thing Twitter needed saving from is itself. Nobody would use a Government platform. It needs a face. Nobody would use a commercial Media run platform either. But they might use his. Especially if he promises who the fuck cares when the market is all wobbles and jitters anyway. Why pay more for it, when it's plunging.

But you're suggesting who gets what, are you in diapers?

Please. It swings and swings back and forth as they both lay more taxes, aligning into the policy of the corps controlling them, granting government its policies and agendas. Until it passes dumber laws doing almost nothing else, except providing you with more taxes, and them even less, because the only people paying for it is you. Nobody has any other vision, when they answer to the same corps, and banks. If there was anybody else they get thrown under a bus.

You thought there was something else to it. Like another narrative, two different teams, on the same pitch? You thought you're gonna get what you voted for; prosperity, free speech, and freedom? Haha. You got jabbed, you get even more ingrates, millions more straight off the banana boats, and now you get to pay for it with even higher costs. But please there's somebody else, going to save you?

Yea it might swing, to another fickle folly, because there's too many assholes blowing shit everywhere. Then all it'll do is shit some more. Or what? You'll finally get to complain about it again. Seriously? There's only more bullshit, and a bigger shitstorm coming.

▲ 1 ▼
Ep0ch 1 point ago +1 / -0

They're both part of the same machine. It is pumped dumped and funded by corps. Corps largely lobbying government, and even empowering government. There are no rivals to funding. They both answer to it. Of course they debate which laws pass. These affect or become affected, by whoever wields policy creating opportunity to exploits, swinging back to any alignment or agenda. But nothing really happens by accident.

As far as this topic goes. The stonks are falling. Why buy them at peak tranny rates. Simply pausing take over causes a drop. Where did those bots go? Who really cares. Get rid of them. But it won't happen.

▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

What other page is there? Socially dystopian media. You meant competition.

Get rid of the bots. What what reeeeee. They're our bots and we spin the narratives. Only 5%, that's on a bad day. Probably reaching critical mass in many tweets, the ones spinning the narratives of any advertising filtering down the threads into mindless trolling, and fake likes.

Until you heard it. Why would anybody want to hear what the plebs say, they need a middleman speaking for them. So the Potus is welcomed. Until he's happily mandating away. The Ministry of Truth needs more middlemen. And cough bots.

▲ 6 ▼
Ep0ch 6 points ago +6 / -0

You're being hysterical. What where how. Have you been silenced. So no it is not the same.

Reddit try it. Please go into any subject and offer disagreement. What happens. You're silenced to the point of being banned simply for not echoing the advertising. You're called a bunch of names, to enforce the ban, or you're simply cancelled.

It is the same on most of social media today. There is no debate. Just irrational advertising. No balance. No center.

Worse on every lefty platform they're inhumane. They've used bots to manipulate their support, banning all opposition. The media aired regurgitates nothing else. It so happens to be emotional support for trannies calling everybody else racist. As they bombard you with peak carbons. And increasing health risks. While also rewriting all the classics into another fetish.

The run off, look at it. Nothing but dystopia. Upto the point of the Ministry of Truth, all it wants are more bots and shills enforcing advertising.

▲ 2 ▼
Ep0ch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not really. But yes it's a result of excluding any views and points. Same cancer. Except it's not, if the left actually produced anything except mindless hysterics and activists, or their enforced advertising, let's face it, is another tranny calling everybody racist for not vaxxing, there might be centered ground. There isn't. They have almost no debate, dumb wokism, and emotional support for even more autism, swamping society into nothing but another rerun with even dumber empowerment. Until all they've become is petty, emotional, and absurd. Put forward debate, accepting not everybody buys it, all that was needed. They factually don't, all they do is brutally silence opposition into their mindless advertising. It has become such God awful trolls. It isn't healthy, it simply labels everybody else not buying their bullshit, the enemy. It has created far more opposition, dystopia, and toxic ignorance.

▲ 11 ▼
Ep0ch 11 points ago +11 / -0

They've stopped using social dystopia.

Reddit is cancer. There are no opposing views. What you would find in every healthy topic/debate. Instead with Reddit there's only manipulation. Until the views it projects are the dumbest on the planet, blind agreement no matter the subject.

They stopped using it. Why would they go to anywhere else. It has become the same thing. The Ministry Truth wants to enforce it, so it's only their bots and shills commenting, or restricting comments until it's the same echo chambers.

Social media has turned into cancer. It's no longer a tool of speech, often inept advertising. Look at the run off being caused. Speculate what is caused. Inflation, these companies advertising are gobbling up the field, lack of ideas, same bullshit being turned over again and again, bots are also writing it, autism, no healthy challenges just mindless agreement, all it has to produce is ignorant agreement, wokism cancelling any other view and subject.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›