▲ 2 ▼
Dorktron4Runner 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds like some real science there. We need Bill Nye or Neil deGas Tyson to confirm though.

▲ 1 ▼
Dorktron4Runner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah, that makes sense. You have a vested interest in knowing if your heart is going to stop randomly or if turbo cancer is going to eat up your insides. Yes, I would be concerned too. Your question was “is the vax really deadly though?” The answer is yes and you can dig into the database and many other international research papers to see for yourself. You’re probably looking for the rate of long-term death and injury for recipients. I’m not going to do that research for you. If you were a “supporter of real science and data”, you wouldn’t have gotten the vax.

Best of luck!

▲ 1 ▼
Dorktron4Runner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, it’s a link for you to dig in which means you won’t because you’re a vax shill. Isn’t that right, new account user? Why would I do all the work for you?

Since you are a vax fan and supporter of fake science, you got all of your scheduled vaxxes, right? Booooosters too? Post vax card.

▲ 1 ▼
Dorktron4Runner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because even VAERS, which is a heavily manipulated database with CDC and FDA oversight, has acknowledged tens of thousands of deaths associated with the vax in the US. Thus, it’s deadly. How many more deaths and injuries are they hiding?

https://vaers.hhs.gov/

▲ 2 ▼
Dorktron4Runner 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did anyone win the money and then die from the vax since then? Because that’d be hilarious.

▲ 1 ▼
Dorktron4Runner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Would the people who have been injured or killed from the vax agree with your statement about it not being poisonous? Do we know what the long-term health implications to people who have taken the vax are? If so, please provide your sources. Has the vax helped the general public in any way? Did it provide immunity?

▲ 1 ▼
Dorktron4Runner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, imagine all the gas that Cheeto-eating fat asses expel on a daily basis. Have you seen the average soy-based human? They’re gross.

▲ 2 ▼
Dorktron4Runner 2 points ago +2 / -0

Which once again shows that the 2024 election is kabuki theater. But muh white hats.

▲ 5 ▼
Dorktron4Runner 5 points ago +5 / -0

When do the fake alien invasions start?

▲ 6 ▼
Dorktron4Runner 6 points ago +6 / -0

Waiting for the human farting accelerating climate change study.

▲ 4 ▼
Dorktron4Runner 4 points ago +4 / -0

Guess we will see…

▲ 3 ▼
Dorktron4Runner 3 points ago +3 / -0

“…in certain situations…”

Like what??

▲ 7 ▼
Dorktron4Runner 7 points ago +7 / -0

Reminder that nothing has been done nor will be done about these crimes.

▲ 1 ▼
Dorktron4Runner 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s infuriating.

▲ 1 ▼
Dorktron4Runner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Space is never a valid reason for anything, really, because nothing about it is achievable as advertised. When are people going to see this? We still have spacefag LARPers on this forum so it isn’t looking good.

Inb4 the backyard telescope idiots say, “But I can seeeeEee the sunspots, brooo! It’s solar WIND, d00d!”. Fuck off.

▲ 2 ▼
Dorktron4Runner 2 points ago +2 / -0

Netflix? Fuck that.

▲ 1 ▼
Dorktron4Runner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right, same. And since you didn’t research terrain theory, I can only assume you won’t do your due diligence with evolution, so I guess we are done here.

Remember how this all started with you joking about my post and the fairy tales listed? My point that these are fairy tales still stands and you haven’t proven otherwise. So, I guess you are boring me at this point. Make a case to disprove my original statement or go away.

▲ 1 ▼
Dorktron4Runner 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ve read Darwin’s research and can provide you with many books to refute it. It’s another fairy tale that your establishment told you to believe in school when you were a kid. It’s indoctrination. It’s also faith-based just like creationism, but at least creationism is thousands of years old and still can’t be refuted. Darwin’s theory is something children believe in which is why you cling to it.

▲ 1 ▼
Dorktron4Runner 1 point ago +1 / -0

You pick and choose? Do you see a problem with that approach? It seems a little too convenient. What about my germ theory question on the vax? Don’t forget to explain that decision point.

What makes you think I don’t believe in “germs”? See, you really need to research more because you can’t even cite what terrain theory means.

by DrLeaks
▲ 1 ▼
Dorktron4Runner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Keep on space larping, bro. It’s entertaining for the rest of us.

▲ 1 ▼
Dorktron4Runner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why are you bringing up the Bible? You obviously don’t believe in anything written in the Bible or “god”.

Stay on one topic at a time. Why did you ignore germ theory and not get the vax? I’m honestly curious on how a normie decided to take the vax or not. What evidence did you use? If you read some of my sources, you may be able to better explain why you made that decision. But you won’t, because you’re weak and must forever cling to your establishment theories.

▲ 1 ▼
Dorktron4Runner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol. I have read them and guess what? I even own a copy of them. You’re a lost cause, keep believing in your establishment fairy tales, fool.

▲ 1 ▼
Dorktron4Runner 1 point ago +1 / -0

How would you know? Did you read the resources I provided that you asked for on terrain theory, simpleton?

Why did you ignore germ theory by not getting the vax? What evidence did you use to make that supposed decision?

▲ 1 ▼
Dorktron4Runner 1 point ago +1 / -0

You should think about getting the jab since you love parroting scientific theories as if they are fact. You seem to trust the establishment. What makes you believe germ theory is real yet you supposedly didn’t get the jab? Do you just pick and choose which fake theory to follow and act upon based on…what? Magic 8 Ball? You certainly don’t have any research knowledge so I’m confused.

▲ 1 ▼
Dorktron4Runner 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s good because I’m not going to waste any more time with a vaxxed evolutionist either.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›