One has only to go out in the country, where there's little light pollution, and look at the night sky and then you realize how large the universe is. Then the foolishness of the idea that we're the only ones around becomes clear. Not only are there others out there, but we are Johnny Come Latelies and probably by large amounts of time. Mars likely had life billions of years ago when it had water. Mars is ancient, we are newborns.
Also, existence of things like the Black Knight satellite show there obviously have been others around.
Oh jeeze. Thank you for the notification. I have read his books, many of them, and although some of what he said is kind of fringe, I think he was onto something. And we need motivated people to keep exploring the fringes of physics.
As science has progressed, in some cases it has made wrong turns and oversimplifications in some areas. It is in the little-explored edges that we make discoveries and advance our knowledge. Bearden correctly identified that for electromagnetism, we oversimplified going to Maxwell's equations, and there are still holes in E/M theory. The Russians have found some of the holes and have made weapons using the augmented theory. For example, there were reports and photos 50 years ago of mysterious domes of light over the ocean from weapons under test. The US has its own highly classified things of mysterious natures too.
Bearden was correct about some technology being suppressed, and some that way for at least 40 years now. In other things he was flat-out wrong, such as claiming that negative resistance generates energy. There, he misinterpreted electronics theory and electric network technology.
The elite, per their plans, are trying to destroy our civilizations. One way they're doing it in the US is through the Soros DAs installations.
The purpose of non-prosecution is to encourage crime - increase crime, and disrupt cities. I believe that crime will keep increasing and destabilizing the US.
We have to take a hard line against this and do what is necessary. You can decide for yourselves what that means, but consider what the old West would have become if regular citizens were not armed.
These days the ignorant expect the police to protect them, except for the far left who want no police at all. That would be the same Marxist far left who burn buildings.
We can't reach the elite far off in Europe, but we can act wisely and definitively on American soil against the predators.
It appears that the WaPo piece was dictated by some extreme left organization and published under a newspaper writer name. However, to give an example, at the San Francisco news website SFGate, the managing editor is a screamingly left fanatic who writes her own heavily slanted articles and reprints a lot of WaPo far left articles.
But yes, the media are full of such paid to plant material; The Atlantic since its takeover (purchase by Jobs' widow) carries a lot of biased bullcrap obviously written to suit an agenda to be PR shotgunned around.
The use of this kid of tool, to push draconian orders, will only intensify if we cannot overthrow the WEF globalists. However, the WEF's owner, the Rothschilds, own the bankling system so it will be hard.
This is a reason to follow a survivalist policy and always have even at least tiny reserve to fall back on if the system tries to shut you off.
Thsi week I said to a friend in South Carolina 'isn't it awful what is happening to the protesters in Canada.' And this normie said 'what's happening in Canada?' She was completely unaware of the trucker blockade, the protesters, the old woman trampled by the police. And -- 'who is Trudeau?'
Personally, I find Meta's worlds creepy as hell. Who in their right mind is going to like living in a video game? This is more of that transhuman shit to replace real life.
And there is no way I'm going to let Zuck make me dependent on him. Consider the Facebook censoring which demonstrates too much power. What if a population becomes dependent on Meta and then Zuck then holds power over whether you can participate in society. Say something he doesn't like, and he cuts off your account and shuts you out from your friends. Too much risk in Meta.
Well, after the recent mass infiltration of new communities obviously created to bring this site down, there needs to be strong action. But action by consensus over valid causes, not the reddit at-whim of a soyboy type of banning.
There is a particular religion that mounts such attacks and we do need to clamp down what is not free speech but is 'by deception shalt thou do war'. It is so apparent when looking at the /niggers sub for example that someone is out to create disorder to bring down a venue of true free speech. So many of the new subs are about hate, and this site is not fundamentally about hate but about true free speech.
But on any new 'mechanisms', let us have checks and balances if possible, so as to prevent dictators emerging.