Regis Tremblay interview with Poornima Wagh, PhD (x2). Uploaded July 9, 2022:
Summary and remarks by The Good Citizen:
The Epoch Times is reporting on it, to their credit. 👍🏻
It could be from other vaccines they're giving children now. Starting with Covid - both Remdesivir and then the vaccines - pharmaceutical poisoning is normalized. When they started doing that, their choices became to win or die, so there are no holds barred now.
Vaccines before Covid were already unsafe - the child deaths and the health issues they cause were swept under the rug. No safety studies were done and other people's research was silenced. Now, they could be putting anything in them.
In New Zealand, Dr. Robin Wakeling found even more graphene (or a graphene-like substance) in the 2021 and 2022 Afluria shots (for the flu) than in Pfizer's Covid vaccine:
Thank you for sharing this. This is incredible. It's also available on Odysee:
https://odysee.com/@Films:5c/F03:2
This has incredible consequences. By playing a frequency to distilled water, it's possible to cause that water to test positive on a PCR test corresponding to the substance that was used to generate the frequency.
Now imagine the water is in your body, the frequency comes from a mobile phone, and the PCR test is for Covid. 🤦♂️
Yes. The cribsheet is originally from here, BTW:
https://off-guardian.org/2021/09/22/30-facts-you-need-to-know-your-covid-cribsheet/
It's training the immune system to blur the lines between what we are and what we destroy.
Yes. What you describe is the exact mechanism why traditional vaccines are harmful. They cause the body to attack itself, leading to chronic autoimmune conditions. People with chronic conditions then don't have the energy to have five children. They maybe have one, at most.
Excellent articles on this topic:
The Complete History of Depopulation Vaccines
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/the-complete-history-of-depopulation
The History of Population Control is Important for Understanding COVID-19
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/the-history-of-population-control
The Military's Anthrax Vaccine Appears to Have Been a Beta Test for COVID-19
https://amidwesterndoctor.substack.com/p/the-real-story-on-hot-covid-19-lots
The exosome comes before symptoms, and may appear in a lightly poisoned person who never gets symptoms.
They do the same thing with HIV. In that case, the poisoning comes through injections (vaccines and illegal drug trade). An exosome (HIV) then appears in the body which is detected by PCR, or antibodies to this exosome are detected.
The exosome (HIV) appears years or decades before you get Kaposi's sarcoma, or whatever. In fact, if your poisoning is "light," the drugs they use to treat "HIV" may cause the same symptoms as AIDS, so you may die from the drugs because you tested positive and sought treatment.
They are doing the same thing with Covid, just the delivery of the initial poison is different (water instead of injections). Testing is an incredibly important aspect of the pandemic, and there would be no pandemic without it. This is the same structure as used with HIV/AIDS.
Psychopaths cannot create their own cowards and fools. Furthermore, they would be almost powerless without them.
The existence of cowards and fools must come first. It is a prerequisite for the rise and reign of psychopaths.
There's a mysterious beauty in how the fundamental problem (cowardice and foolishness) already contained the seeds of its own solution. It empowered psychopaths, which now destroy the cowards and the fools. Or is that, maybe, just a lucky accident for us?
If we survive this, new cowards and fools are going to be born. How do we prevent this one day happening again?
But here is the trick: they have had that control for centuries. So lots of things we think we know about science and history are spin or false.
https://rumble.com/vf9xkf-myron-c.-fagan-on-the-cfr-the-un-the-illuminati-and-skull-bones..html
What's new this time is overt control of social media. They tried to elect Hillary in 2016 without overt social media censorship, and it failed.
Intuitions are not simply feelings. Intuitions are feelings which turn out to be correct, beyond the reach of any rationalizations.
I ignored intuitions in the past, and favored my rationalizations. It cost me millions in material terms. This is just losses I can measure. The loss of alternate futures is not measurable.
Reason is like a knife. You can use it to cut yourself real hard. Use reason - but oppose intuitions at your peril.
The scope of the conspiracy is such that the people who would help overcome it, have to have been through it.
The reasons I believe this are personal and intuitive. When nothing seems to offer a solution, intuition is what you have.
It's one thing to be aware of the connections you point out. It's another thing to despair that "therefore," doom is inevitable.
I find it hard to believe this about Trump or De Santis, and several other figures who seem to be authentic. This is even though Trump pushed through, and took ownership for, the vaccines.
My reason for this is intuition. Trump may or may not have started as a show - but I believe he was "not supposed to win."
After he won, there are limits to what he can do without being assassinated. JFK got assassinated. They ousted Nixon with Watergate, and they tried to assassinate Reagan too.
I'm not ready for the total black pill that EVERYONE is a shill. There are people who have shown integrity, and continue to show it. If they too are put in place, then I hope they were put in place by a positive force, otherwise we're really f-ed. :)
You gotta allow for a light at the end of the tunnel. Otherwise, it's just a tunnel. :)
Keep in mind that Alex Berenson is a plant. He maintains all of the official narratives except vaccine efficacy. He does not even talk about adverse effects. He has attacked and tried to discredit people, including Robert Malone and Joe Rogan. He ridiculed ivermectin using the fraudulent Malaysian study, which is rigged to exclude zinc, and whose real results are the opposite of what is stated. His book is to explain away a globally coordinated genocide with malicious aforethought as if it's just a bunch of mediocre government officials grappling with complex problems.
He is a former New York Times reporter, which means basically an intelligence propagandist. He is a damage mitigator, not a friend.
Sky daddy does love them, for some definition of "sky daddy" that almost no-one understands.
The trouble is, really, that people no longer believe in the sky daddy, but they still want to believe that someone loves them. So after sky daddy, who's next in the hierarchy, from whom to expect unconditional love? Well, it's the government.
Shucks.
What's happening is hypnosis, and all hypnosis is voluntary.
People differ in whether they are easily hypnotized, moderately susceptible, or almost not susceptible.
Those of us here are probably not susceptible to hypnosis. Most people are easily hypnotized or moderately susceptible.
This means they lack a psychological backbone. Suffering, perhaps, is a way to force a psychological backbone to develop.
The corporations embraced open source at least a decade ago. Android is built on open source. Windows began embracing it since Windows 8, which marks the fall of Windows as a desktop OS and the beginning of Windows as spyware. Google and Facebook have used and manipulated open source from their beginning.
The main argument for open source is code reuse, but code reuse is a false idol. We need code diversity, just like we need diversity in genetics. We need a resilient and redundant technological ecosystem, not a fragile one, and a single code base is ultimate fragility.
The ultimate result of code reuse applied to genetics is that humans become clones. Then we realize that we don't need so many clones, and radically reduce the number of humans. Code reuse is, basically, death of all alternatives.
I'm not trying to reply to your points, I'm trying to explain why your points are stupid. You are missing the forest for the trees.
I spent some time editing the previous reply, it is now larger than when you read it.
It doesn't matter if you answer, I would prefer if you don't.
You are not expressing a coherent thought, except sniveling outrage because your pride is being belittled.
This is characteristic of open source zealots. One has to be unstable to waste one's talents for no pay. "I'm contributing to humanity!"
You're contributing to Google grinding us to dust. The technology we're creating is anti-human. The fire you praise will eat us.
If we survive the next few years, we need to slow down with technology to a halt, and rebuild a lot of it from scratch.
The breakneck "progress" is harmful and stupid. Do things slow. Do them many times over. One day, do things right.
You must be missing a second brain cell if you think someone with no experience would be linking you to a Joel Spolsky piece from 2002.
https://www.joelonsoftware.com/2002/06/12/strategy-letter-v/
Bootloaders are fun and easy. Everyone should write one!
What you wrote is indeed mindless.
Go get paid for your open source programming. Who is going to pay you? (Some big corp) How much? (A token amount, compared to the value of your work for them) And why? (So you can "own nothing and be happy")
Open source is about devaluing code and empowering the cloud. It's commoditizing the complement of the cloud. The cloud is all about total surveillance and centralization. Through vaccines, this includes expression of your genes and a remote off-switch for your body.
Open source is communism. Developers work and don't get paid. Big tech uses their work to control the world and build a tyrannical world government.
This is a time to let go of worry, and trust God, the Universe, Jesus, or whatever is your personal understanding of that force.
There were reasons for Black Death as well, and they were primarily social and psychological. It created necessary change.
Expect a good outcome, even if you can't see how it could possibly happen. Accept that the good outcome may involve many deaths. Try to see that death is not the end of anything, it's a transition. It's not truly tragic for the dead, except from our limited viewpoint.
I don't think Luc had a full understanding. Or if he did, I don't think he communicated it in direct terms. But he meant well.
I do trust that he isolated HIV, but the properties of this HIV are misinterpreted. Correlation is confused for causation, especially when no one dares consider the alternative: that this is a decades-long, organized project of mass poisoning, done in preparation for Covid.
Lots of doctors, scientists, virologists, immunologists are discussing the harm of the Covid vaccines on the assumption that some part of the official narrative is true. That it's not intentional poisoning. So they try to explain what's happening on the basis of official story elements, like "the spike protein is more harmful than we thought." But the toxic unofficial ingredients are found and documented:
Folks should reconsider the whole idea of "discrediting." Fundamentally, the concept of "discrediting" assumes that there are people who can be taken at face value and their every word can be believed, as opposed to the "discredited" person or entity.
There aren't actually any people or organizations who can be blindly believed about anything. Even people who communicate diligently and in good faith are practically always mistaken about multiple important things, and the audience must realize that.
The mental habit of trying to find someone to believe blindly does not just prevent truthful discovery, but is negligent and deadly.