-1
BasedBobRoss -1 points ago +2 / -3

Lol link other provable DEW destruction thats on the same scale.

Judy Woods is disinformation.

1
BasedBobRoss 1 point ago +1 / -0

How will you faggot?

You've been sucking their dick and will continue to do so.

You gonna be against the leftys now? Oh you might speak soft words of disappointment? LOL what a faggot.

1
BasedBobRoss 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why you worried about one small instance of a guy who gets rid of loser trolls and not the much larger problem that plagues reddit?

You're a fucking moron lefty mad you can't troll on r/conspiracy, boohoo faggot.

3
BasedBobRoss 3 points ago +4 / -1

Get some pork sausage and force it in your ass. They'll never bother you again.

0
BasedBobRoss 0 points ago +1 / -1

Lol so you overlook the much larger and widespread censorship on reddit and focus on one guy in a minor sub? Lol fucking clown shoes

"But I agree with the censorship and propaganda on the rest of the site so its okay" lol you pathetic hypocrite loser.

-1
BasedBobRoss -1 points ago +1 / -2

Sad, you follow a guy around different websites and defend creepy establishment pieces of shit. You are a loser lol

9
BasedBobRoss 9 points ago +11 / -2

Lol who takes time out of their day to come here to defend John fucking podesta of all people? Lol what a pathetic loser.

1
BasedBobRoss 1 point ago +2 / -1

My long con? Are you legit schizophrenic? 16 and think you have it all figured out already?

3
BasedBobRoss 3 points ago +6 / -3

Lol reddit is full of pedos. Wherever leftists, trannys etc hangout there's pedos.

1
BasedBobRoss 1 point ago +2 / -1

Lol ok, any evidence? Show any real evidence or proof. pics of burnt cars isn't proof of some space laser capable of destroying buildings.

You can't post proof because there is none.

-1
BasedBobRoss -1 points ago +2 / -3

Sound theory huh? No evidence other than pictures of cars parked somewhere and a video of a spire falling to the ground. Theres even pictures of it on the ground but since it fell into a cloud of dust it "dustified" lol you guys are clowns. Literally no proof, just misrepresenting what happened in a video and pictures the rest is all speculation and attacks on 9/11 truth.

Who comes on the scene years late and starts off by attacking 9/11 truth? Judy Woods. She would file copyright claims of others YT vids if they dared critique anything she said getting the videos taken down (sounds like a real truth seeker).

All you have is your wild speculation. Speculation that can be hijacked. It wasn't our DEWs it was ALIENS! They did this Judy is trying to throw you off the scent of the ALIENS who attacked us on 9/11. You can't counter that without acknowledging that Judy's shit is pure speculation with zero proof of anything.

Where's she even at? You guys are working with old ass shit, you'd think she'd would have gotten you some actual evidence by now? Whats up with that? Its like she was used to crush a growing movement with her made up nonsense.

But you can't be wrong you sat through a 3 hour video where she talks about cheesy poofs and fuzzy blobs and shows pictures of cars that had fire damage, SCIENCE!

-1
BasedBobRoss -1 points ago +2 / -3

Also John "I film my experiments on a camera from the 80s so you dont notice my fishing line" Hutchinson. ?

Yikes man. I noticed you forgot to explain the "cheetos" lol.

1
BasedBobRoss 1 point ago +5 / -4

Judy Woods is disinformation. You should know better by now.

Edit: oof you went full retard. Not a good look.

-1
BasedBobRoss -1 points ago +1 / -2

How many deaths from the mentally ill left wing riots did you forget about?

by Spoonks
0
BasedBobRoss 0 points ago +1 / -1

Honestly if you're still butthurt over weed you're a fucking moron and you need to get over it.

1
BasedBobRoss 1 point ago +1 / -0

They can be trans, thats fine. Don't push it on kids, don't force others to submit to your delusions and were good. Other than that eat my ass you faggot, keep your advice to yourself.

0
BasedBobRoss 0 points ago +1 / -1

One guy trying to get a rise out of you (not hard) removes validity from something a completely different person said?

You aren't even allowed to speak simple truths about jews, how is stepping lightly around their control going to "win a war"?

1
BasedBobRoss 1 point ago +2 / -1

So you can generalize against those who speak out against Jewish subversion but people can't generalize against jews?

2
BasedBobRoss 2 points ago +3 / -1

Same name on reddit, just arrived.

No one means some random nobody jew when they're talking about jews they're talking about the subverters, the random blue checkmarks on Twitter, the sjws, the msm people, the politicians.

Also you're not winning shit against people who can censor you and lie constantly. So all this leave jews alone shit is rather suspect when you want people to stop doing exactly what they do and have mastered.

view more: Next ›