"Directed Energy Weapons" refer to any number of types of unconventional and exotic weaponry.
The full range of these weapons is classified information, so no attempts will be made to distinguish between categories within the realm of energy weapons, as doing so would imply specific knowledge of all that are available.
In addition, no claim is be made about whether the directed energy weapon operates from a space-, air-, or ground-based platform, nor are any claims made about whether or not it involves sound waves, antimatter weapons, scalar weapons, a facility like HAARP, etc.
However, the evidence appears consistent with the use of energy weapons that go well beyond the capabilities of conventional explosives.
Wikipedia article on Directed-Energy Weapons
Although speculation about DEWs on 9/11 began shortly after the event, one of the first scientists with relevant credentials to publicly propose the DEW hypothesis was Dr. Judy Wood, a former professor of mechanical engineering.
The following material is largely from her book Where Did the Towers Go?, as well as from her old and new websites.
Where Did the Towers Go?
I. 9/11 Enigmas
II. New Nomenclature
Judy Woods is disinformation. You should know better by now.
Edit: oof you went full retard. Not a good look.
agreed.
a simple nuclear demotion device to melt the base + thermite charges to drop the buildings top-down.
It is a sound theory Dr. Wood has. The ones coming off like you are so easy to spot.
nukes are "directed energy weapons"
if by "directed energy weapons" she means "nuclear demolition devices" then yea... i agree.
if she means "space weapons" then no. she's CIA #limitedhangout.
haha a sound theory? holograms and no planes? dude you are the retard
Sound theory huh? No evidence other than pictures of cars parked somewhere and a video of a spire falling to the ground. Theres even pictures of it on the ground but since it fell into a cloud of dust it "dustified" lol you guys are clowns. Literally no proof, just misrepresenting what happened in a video and pictures the rest is all speculation and attacks on 9/11 truth.
Who comes on the scene years late and starts off by attacking 9/11 truth? Judy Woods. She would file copyright claims of others YT vids if they dared critique anything she said getting the videos taken down (sounds like a real truth seeker).
All you have is your wild speculation. Speculation that can be hijacked. It wasn't our DEWs it was ALIENS! They did this Judy is trying to throw you off the scent of the ALIENS who attacked us on 9/11. You can't counter that without acknowledging that Judy's shit is pure speculation with zero proof of anything.
Where's she even at? You guys are working with old ass shit, you'd think she'd would have gotten you some actual evidence by now? Whats up with that? Its like she was used to crush a growing movement with her made up nonsense.
But you can't be wrong you sat through a 3 hour video where she talks about cheesy poofs and fuzzy blobs and shows pictures of cars that had fire damage, SCIENCE!
Pasting bullshit is what you did
Lol ok, any evidence? Show any real evidence or proof. pics of burnt cars isn't proof of some space laser capable of destroying buildings.
You can't post proof because there is none.
Also John "I film my experiments on a camera from the 80s so you dont notice my fishing line" Hutchinson. ?
Yikes man. I noticed you forgot to explain the "cheetos" lol.
Everyone knows the towers fell off the edge of the Earth