1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

Secondly, since his calculated force of gravity was 10^39 weaker than the force of electro-magnetism, from which all material objects are composed, there is no control for the experiment which can factor out and positively differentiate the alleged gravitational force, from the known stronger electro-magnetic force. In other words, the balls could simply be attracting each other through static electricity, a known force existing in all things, billions of times stronger than gravity, and impossible to control for the experiment.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

Electron microscope = CGI.

Cavendish Experiment Proves Gravity?

https://youtu.be/CB-_A1AIEjo

5
Allas8 5 points ago +5 / -0

Gravity is the idea that two objects attract each other, something that has not been proven. Moon having any sort of influence over tidal waves, is not proven, as tidal waves work independent on the position of the moon, and does not affect lakes. And you do not need gravity to explain why a object falls, people been able to do that using buoyancy and density before someone made up gravity to explain what is apparent.

2
Allas8 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do not think it is relative, no. The sun moves in a constant clockwise direction, whether you face North or South when looking at the sun. Only difference is if you are inside our outside the the circle the sun makes across our sky.

6
Allas8 6 points ago +6 / -0

No. Track the position of the sun every hour you see it in the sky for a day, draw a line between the positions you have marked, and you will see that it moves in a clockwise circle, always.

4
Allas8 4 points ago +4 / -0

A merry go around is flat though. Based on which way you spin, the sun will either spin in a clockwise direction, or a counter clock wise direction, no matter the position of the sun. not matter where on the Merry go around you are, perfectly demonstarting the principal I lay out.

Start spinning a ball on the other hand, and the sun will either move in a clock wise direction, or a counter clock wise direction, based on if you are on top of the ball, or under the ball.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

Since you make a circle. If you move west, you do not move in a straight line. Your distance to the north pole always stays the same, as long as you move in a west ward direction. Are you one meter away from the North pole, and move in a west ward direction, you would move in a 6.25 meter big circle before you got back to the point you started from.

4
Allas8 4 points ago +4 / -0

Antarctica is the end of the known world. Where the edge is, is speculation.

3
Allas8 3 points ago +3 / -0

Circle navigating our flat world is not that hard, all you have to do is follow the path of the sun, go in a constant west ward direction. For every mile moved in a constant west ward direction, you will move 8 inches toward the north (a right turn). If you move on a south ward direction, eventually you will hit the ice wall known as Antarctica. Since the Antarctic treaty was signed, private exploration of the southern most part of our world has been forbidden.

14
Allas8 14 points ago +14 / -0

Here is how you can prove that the heliocentric model is false by observing the sun. The sun always moves in a clockwise direction, no matter what time of the year, no matter where on earth you are, as you see the sun move from one side of the horizon to the other, it will make a right turn, from your perspective. In the heliocentric model, when the south pole is tilting towards the sun, the sun should move in a counter clockwise direction, as it moves across the sky, from your perspective.

Same with star trails. The north star always stays stationary, all the other stars rotates around the north star. The farther south you get, the bigger of a circle the star trails will make, as they move around the point of the north star. Even when you get passed the equator, the star trails keep getting bigger and bigger, the further south you get, proving that there is no south pole. If the heliocentric model was correct, it be easy to prove that the star trails was getting smaller and smaler when viewed from say Australia, in a south ward direction, as they do in the north.

While the moon, based on every single observation I have every made, is a disc, not a ball, as I have only seen one side of the moon.

6
Allas8 6 points ago +6 / -0

So since 1+1=2 we live on a ball? Once you make observations, start assuming that the earth is flat, and all your observations will fit into the model, only problem comes with your understanding of the model.

4
Allas8 4 points ago +4 / -0

So this video claims that Hamas was created by Israel. There is no one fighting/hating the Jews, this is all done to create fear among the Jewish population in Israel, so the government can control them, and genocide the Palestinian population, which currently is at 14 million, where 2.1 lives in Gaza, which is at a all time high.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/world-cities/gaza-population

I am trying to understand the situation here, and figure out what exactly it is that people are so upset about. As the solution seems simple to me; make peace with Israel, accept a two state solution, and stop blaming the Jews for just about everything.

4
Allas8 4 points ago +4 / -0

Mao Zedong was responsible for killing over 40 million of his own citizens, and you expect him to tell you the truth?

8
Allas8 8 points ago +8 / -0

You say that, while I am confident that we be down $20B with no trashcan on the moon.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

Same reason as North Korea do not need nukes to wipe out Seoul. V2 missiles is still a thing. While nukes are a fantasy.

2
Allas8 2 points ago +2 / -0

The fact that if you arme people, they rather just turn on the people who armed them, instead of going to die in some pointless war.

2
Allas8 2 points ago +2 / -0

Glad to see you value my understanding. You do not have to discuss moonhoax, no one is forcing you to participate. There is a hide feature on this site, where you can hide individual posts that you do not want to see.

Why do people discuss it? Because people care about the moon. You can go outside, look up at the moon, and marvel, that no man has ever been there before. JFK on the other hand, no one cares about, he is some forgotten nobody. Dust, that is JFK, and no one cares about dust.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

First you claim you do not care, now you claim you want to understand it. That is fine with me. As more post are made on the topic, I am sure you will gain a better understanding on the moon hoax topic.

If you want to discuss the JFK hoax, feel free to make topics about it. I personally do not care what celebrities are up to, so I tend to stay away from those kind of topics.

Kind of interesting that JFK is the one that announced that USA was going to the moon, maybe the elite was not happy about that, as it would expose that landing on the moon was impossible, so that is why they got rid of him.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

The point is that people will know the truth, and I for one care about the truth, even if other do not.

If I tell someone the truth, but all they care about is what their iPhones tell them, that is fine by me. But this is a conspiracy community, where the hole point is to talk about conspiracies, not your iPhone.

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

The footage from the craft on the moon from China is so fake that it is not even funny. If you believe them, you might as well believe North Korea when they said they landed on the sun. It is not like the government would ever lie to you, right?

1
Allas8 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can not have them break their programming, by looking into the fake moon stuff. Bread and circus, keep the masses entertained. Stop paying attention to what the government does not want you to know, that is what I hear you saying.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›