The point is that people will know the truth, and I for one care about the truth, even if other do not.
If I tell someone the truth, but all they care about is what their iPhones tell them, that is fine by me. But this is a conspiracy community, where the hole point is to talk about conspiracies, not your iPhone.
But this is a conspiracy community, where the hole point is to talk about conspiracies
There is hundreds and thousands of conspiracy theories around. Some are important and we digging them actively here, some are settled long time ago and everybody know all arguments.
I don't see many discussions on JFK asassination here, f.e. But moonhoax topics pops routenly. Does that mean that question of US Moon Landing is much more important than JFK asassination?
As far as I understand, settled conspiracy theories have its honored place in library, and there was no any advances in them for a long time. Everybody who want to know about them could do it without any problems. No need to discuss them frequently. Others, that get updates from ongoing events discussed more intensively, and that is completely logical - new information allow to make theory stronger, or disprove it, so it is critical to discuss them.
What place moonhoax theory takes among all that theories? I didn't saw any interesting updates to it for a long time. May be, I even know more arguments for that theory than any who continue to post it here, since I have access not only to US/Europe conspiracy theories, but also to Russian ones. But here we didn't getting any updates too.
Why is it so special among other, that is is necessary to constantly pop it up without adding anything to what everybody here perfectly know for a long time?
I really don't understand that obsession with moonhoax in English-speaking communities, and just want to understand it.
First you claim you do not care, now you claim you want to understand it. That is fine with me. As more post are made on the topic, I am sure you will gain a better understanding on the moon hoax topic.
If you want to discuss the JFK hoax, feel free to make topics about it. I personally do not care what celebrities are up to, so I tend to stay away from those kind of topics.
Kind of interesting that JFK is the one that announced that USA was going to the moon, maybe the elite was not happy about that, as it would expose that landing on the moon was impossible, so that is why they got rid of him.
I want to understand why that question is important for you.
If you want to discuss the JFK hoax, feel free to make topics about it.
I don't want to discuss it, since there are no any fresh info on it. Everything is discussed long ago. So with moonhoax. I want to know why moonhoax is important thing to discuss without any fresh info again and again, and JFK asassination is not. For me, both things are old and settled theories of same imortance with no new info for a long time.
Glad to see you value my understanding. You do not have to discuss moonhoax, no one is forcing you to participate. There is a hide feature on this site, where you can hide individual posts that you do not want to see.
Why do people discuss it? Because people care about the moon. You can go outside, look up at the moon, and marvel, that no man has ever been there before. JFK on the other hand, no one cares about, he is some forgotten nobody. Dust, that is JFK, and no one cares about dust.
The point is that people will know the truth, and I for one care about the truth, even if other do not.
If I tell someone the truth, but all they care about is what their iPhones tell them, that is fine by me. But this is a conspiracy community, where the hole point is to talk about conspiracies, not your iPhone.
There is hundreds and thousands of conspiracy theories around. Some are important and we digging them actively here, some are settled long time ago and everybody know all arguments. I don't see many discussions on JFK asassination here, f.e. But moonhoax topics pops routenly. Does that mean that question of US Moon Landing is much more important than JFK asassination?
As far as I understand, settled conspiracy theories have its honored place in library, and there was no any advances in them for a long time. Everybody who want to know about them could do it without any problems. No need to discuss them frequently. Others, that get updates from ongoing events discussed more intensively, and that is completely logical - new information allow to make theory stronger, or disprove it, so it is critical to discuss them.
What place moonhoax theory takes among all that theories? I didn't saw any interesting updates to it for a long time. May be, I even know more arguments for that theory than any who continue to post it here, since I have access not only to US/Europe conspiracy theories, but also to Russian ones. But here we didn't getting any updates too.
Why is it so special among other, that is is necessary to constantly pop it up without adding anything to what everybody here perfectly know for a long time?
I really don't understand that obsession with moonhoax in English-speaking communities, and just want to understand it.
First you claim you do not care, now you claim you want to understand it. That is fine with me. As more post are made on the topic, I am sure you will gain a better understanding on the moon hoax topic.
If you want to discuss the JFK hoax, feel free to make topics about it. I personally do not care what celebrities are up to, so I tend to stay away from those kind of topics.
Kind of interesting that JFK is the one that announced that USA was going to the moon, maybe the elite was not happy about that, as it would expose that landing on the moon was impossible, so that is why they got rid of him.
I don't care, was it hoax, or not.
I want to understand why that question is important for you.
I don't want to discuss it, since there are no any fresh info on it. Everything is discussed long ago. So with moonhoax. I want to know why moonhoax is important thing to discuss without any fresh info again and again, and JFK asassination is not. For me, both things are old and settled theories of same imortance with no new info for a long time.
Glad to see you value my understanding. You do not have to discuss moonhoax, no one is forcing you to participate. There is a hide feature on this site, where you can hide individual posts that you do not want to see.
Why do people discuss it? Because people care about the moon. You can go outside, look up at the moon, and marvel, that no man has ever been there before. JFK on the other hand, no one cares about, he is some forgotten nobody. Dust, that is JFK, and no one cares about dust.