No. What is preventing all out war. Currently. Nukes are.
Not speculation.
Of course there is a mad little AI embedding itself for profit. Playing both sides off. While investors reap the rewards of the conflicts generated.
It would be much easier to destroy a military conventionally otherwise. Suggesting they don't exist, is ridiculous. Because war is easier. It was against Saddam, and many others. You don't even need to win the war by holding on to Iraq. You just need to wipe out its military industrial complex. Then the opponent destroys themself, or install a favorable government.
So tell me genius why they haven't gone to war against those sides today. Look at them. Why hasn't Nato rolled in. It would lead to a bigger war, yes. But with no nukes, an easier win. Well, because they're both profiting off it. Yes undoubtedly. But it's because nukes are preventing it.
Stop shit posting this crap. Every Zombie would be at. Everywhere overnight. They'd rush America, they are, but through bullshit immigration. Overnight how many would give them a gigantic finger if there was no nukes. Look at Israel. It would be World War Z. What prevents it. Not Israel. Nukes do.
North Korea acquiring nukes is big. They can wipe out Seoul with their artillery, and conventional missiles. Higher elevation. What prevented them was nukes. By getting nukes, war becomes probability. This is why the current Admin is threatening their current test. But they'll anyway. What more dumb sanctions on top of the dumber sanctions. Japan gets nukes. South Korea gets nukes. Ontop of the American nukes? No, what.
Meanwhile Iran is also weaponizing. Ignoring the inspectors, refusing the inspectors, lying to the inspectors. What happens today. Instead of posting bullshit videos. The odds are incredibly high that nukes could become engaged. That factor is at its highest in history. Including in the current conflict happening.
What happens when more nations get nukes supposedly preventing nukes from occurring. No. They haven't. Besides many nations have them already. More than any wiki and Google will ever say. Nothing has been prevented. Instead their risk is at its highest historically.
But you believe there's gonna be what here ahead? You believe they aren't real. No. Because war would be easier. There would be a winner. It would be easier eliminating some of these rogue nations military industrial complexes. Of course profit suffers. But that question sooner becomes what would you rather? The risk they go off, or war? There's no peace until they go off. Why not war to prevent them?
Or are the stupid sides gonna sit down making some dumb rules of you pay me more. They have, and it doesn't work. They just make more nukes.
Yawn this topic, every time.
What is preventing all out war right now?
The fact that if you arme people, they rather just turn on the people who armed them, instead of going to die in some pointless war.
No. What is preventing all out war. Currently. Nukes are.
Not speculation.
Of course there is a mad little AI embedding itself for profit. Playing both sides off. While investors reap the rewards of the conflicts generated.
It would be much easier to destroy a military conventionally otherwise. Suggesting they don't exist, is ridiculous. Because war is easier. It was against Saddam, and many others. You don't even need to win the war by holding on to Iraq. You just need to wipe out its military industrial complex. Then the opponent destroys themself, or install a favorable government.
So tell me genius why they haven't gone to war against those sides today. Look at them. Why hasn't Nato rolled in. It would lead to a bigger war, yes. But with no nukes, an easier win. Well, because they're both profiting off it. Yes undoubtedly. But it's because nukes are preventing it.
Stop shit posting this crap. Every Zombie would be at. Everywhere overnight. They'd rush America, they are, but through bullshit immigration. Overnight how many would give them a gigantic finger if there was no nukes. Look at Israel. It would be World War Z. What prevents it. Not Israel. Nukes do.
Same reason as North Korea do not need nukes to wipe out Seoul. V2 missiles is still a thing. While nukes are a fantasy.
Stop it you're dumber than a sack of bricks.
North Korea acquiring nukes is big. They can wipe out Seoul with their artillery, and conventional missiles. Higher elevation. What prevented them was nukes. By getting nukes, war becomes probability. This is why the current Admin is threatening their current test. But they'll anyway. What more dumb sanctions on top of the dumber sanctions. Japan gets nukes. South Korea gets nukes. Ontop of the American nukes? No, what.
Meanwhile Iran is also weaponizing. Ignoring the inspectors, refusing the inspectors, lying to the inspectors. What happens today. Instead of posting bullshit videos. The odds are incredibly high that nukes could become engaged. That factor is at its highest in history. Including in the current conflict happening.
What happens when more nations get nukes supposedly preventing nukes from occurring. No. They haven't. Besides many nations have them already. More than any wiki and Google will ever say. Nothing has been prevented. Instead their risk is at its highest historically.
But you believe there's gonna be what here ahead? You believe they aren't real. No. Because war would be easier. There would be a winner. It would be easier eliminating some of these rogue nations military industrial complexes. Of course profit suffers. But that question sooner becomes what would you rather? The risk they go off, or war? There's no peace until they go off. Why not war to prevent them?
Or are the stupid sides gonna sit down making some dumb rules of you pay me more. They have, and it doesn't work. They just make more nukes.