1
Agent777 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's how the vaccine was supposed to work from the begining: Get vaxxed so that you catch covid, gain immunity after surviving covid. Fool proof plan and it would have worked if it weren't for those damned antivaxxers.

11
Agent777 11 points ago +11 / -0

Studying them is one thing making GE/gain of function viruses or making GE super bugs is another.

3
Agent777 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not to mention how the naturally immune who never knew they were infected and got vaxxed anyway have inflated the success rate of the vaccine.

As in they say all these vaxxed people aren't getting sick but many of them actually have natural immunity

2
Agent777 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's unrealistic expectations from you antivaxxers that got us into this mess to begin.

2
Agent777 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can't expect a vaccine to last forever. And it was never supposed to stop the spread or the infection. That's why it's so important thY we all get red vaxxed

3
Agent777 3 points ago +3 / -0

Those forums are totally controlling the narrative. They have rules that if broken you can be banned. They call it dooming, but basicly if you argue the current narratives they call it dooming and can ban you.

So basicly anything contrary to the narrative is illegal in those forums.

2
Agent777 2 points ago +2 / -0

They should do away with all these pills, and just develop an mRNA red vaccine. One simple jab is 95% effective at stopping infection, and transmission of propaganda, bullshit, and false narratives.

2
Agent777 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was talking to a friend to day about this sort of thing which is that the media has become so untrustworthy that you just don't know what to believe about anything they say about WW3 even. Pretty sad.

3
Agent777 3 points ago +4 / -1

I would think that if Russia was in there for other reasons but all of the sudden the USA has the half the. World turned on Russia and sanctioning them that proof of the leader of the USA having shady dealings with Ukraine would be something highly desirable. If the USA is putting the hurt on you through sanctions and the reason they are doing that is due to cltheir own corruption, and you could prove that, then that is exactly what you would want to do.

He is risking his soldiers for other things, but could do this to shut the USA up.

4
Agent777 4 points ago +4 / -0

Is the intended meaning of this that we should just leave all the thinking to the experts?

1
Agent777 1 point ago +1 / -0

I never said that, but pretending I did and calling me a bafoon because you lost the logic and reasoning part of the argument is a great way to deflect and back out because your trying to save face.

But since you brought it up, printed paper money would have alot more uses in a survival situation than gold does.

You could use it to start a fire for one thing.

What we are talking about is the fact that gold has no actual value, even as a useful substance like wood or rock does. You can't even make a tool out of it. A random rock has more utility than gold does and do to the abundance of random rocks they are a far more valuable resource when utility is what your after.

3
Agent777 3 points ago +3 / -0

So you're saying they are counting their decades long tradition of falsifying and withholding information?

How shocking!

Does anyone else find it amusing that they are called the the Center of Disease CONTROL? THey should also add the word spread CDSC.

Everything you were taught in school about how to spot a biased source of information (which we were all taught in school) when applied to the CDC makes it pretty clear that they are a biased source of information.

In so many ways, but they have a stated agenda to promote vaccination which absolutely qualifies them as a biased aource.

Every normy or blue pill when having that pointed out to them has a moment of realization that you can see on their face as they realize they can't argue against that and that it's correct.

That fact about them means, according to everything we are taught in school about biased sources, means that they can't actually be trusted, and that they will even go so far as to hide information in ncluding facts that counter their agenda and narrative. That's when you point out that their agenda and narrative have not changed regardless of the facts and conditions changing and point out because that in is because they actually have a mission and agenda to do something regardless of the facts and conditions surrounding that.

Do not trust their science.

1
Agent777 1 point ago +1 / -0

They're all true and factual and can be validated by the Canadian govt and the govt of England. None of the assertions that Canada is rules by England have anything to back them up..

How about yours? No?

1
Agent777 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right and the value of gold that was assigned by it's use has simply been that it has value. It has had no use for thousands of years until recently with computers which has nothing to do with why it is so valued.

But your begining to catch on. It is an arbitrary proxy of value that has no use other than as a proxy for value which is why the cultures that weren't born from Babylon did not value it at all.

Be ause it is rare and has no use most cultures in earth did not assign it any value at all until they were dominated by the beast that emerged from Babylon.

So basicly the assigning of value to it has been somewhat of a mental illness.

And no, it is not just as easy to say all things have inherent value. More accurate to say that no thing has any inherent value.

But t least things like wood and regular stone have lots of uses and in so much you can say they have a tual value where you can't say that with gold unless your making a computer.

As someone else pointed out in this thread. If you were going to have to survive on a desert island gold would not even make your list of 1000 things to bring because it would have zero uses for you.

1
Agent777 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gold has no inherent value, certainly not an actual resource without the projection of value on it. It is only valuable because it's worth money right now, and historically it's only value was we said it had value.

It literally is not a resource. As someone in this thread pointed out, if you were going to stay on a desert island it would not even make a list of 1000 items to bring along because it has no inherent value.

Wood is literally more useful.

So gold becoming a resource in the 20th century because they finally found a use for it Wich is in computers is why it has been valuable for 12,000 years? I seriously doubt that Again, gold has just recently become a resource. Historically it's only value has been that we use it to project value on.

It's only value to anyone is that it's worth money. If it didn't have a cash value you wouldn't want it.

Doni think that money is just empty little notes? Absolutely, just like gold it's only value is that we use it to project value on to it. Noether the paper, not the gold that used to back it like 49!years ago have ANY inherent value.

Their value is a circular flow chart. Money has value because 40 years ago it was backed by gold. Gold has value because it's worth money.

0
Agent777 0 points ago +1 / -1

The reality is currency is NOT backed by gold, gold IS backed by currency.. Why does anyone want gold? Only because it's redeemable for cash. It's cash value IS it's only value. No one cares that money isn't worth gold, but no one would even want gold if it weren't worth money.

Gold never had inherent value.nit has no more inherent value than cash does.

0
Agent777 0 points ago +1 / -1

There is no reason gold is worth any more than flower bulbs.

I think it's hilarious when people talk about the gold giving value to fiat. And then when they were all" Oh my, there is no gold backing up all the money in circulation, so the money is worthless."

Yes, the money IS worthless, absolutely. All the value it has is only because we project that value onto it.

We saw gold gives it value, but what gives gold value??? It's rarity? Nope that does not give it any value whatsoever.

What gives gold value is that it is worth money. When people get excited about the value of gold it never has to do with it's rarity, it always has to do with it's CASH value.

So money gives gold value. What is gold worth? It's worth a CASH value. What gives cash it's value? Gold?

LMFAO

AGAIN; cash has value because it is backed by gold, but gold has value because it is worth money. If gold couldn't be redeemed for cash money absolutely no one would want it, so really it is money that gives gold value

And again both only have any real value because we project that on it and agree to play that game. To the average person historically gold has had absolutely no use or value other than as money and the only reason it has had value as money is because the people back then agreed to project that onto it.

Probably some deranged king forced his kingdom to adopt that view of gold in order to make himself wealthy and powerful, and it spread by way of warfare

Other places around the world gold had no more value than any other rock, and in some cultures it's complete lack of value had everything to do with it's rarity because to most permanent cultures the most desirable resources are the ones that are the most abundant, not the most rare. This whole half of the world did not prize gold at all except some of the cultures used it for art do to it's pliability, but there was no fever over it because no deranged king ever forced people to project that o to it. The descendents of those same people have adopted the practice of projecting value on gold. It is almost like adopting a mental illness really.

It is actually only in the recent times and hat gold actually has value. That value is in electronics and catalytic converters, things like that, but please don't try to say that that is what makes it around $1250.00 an oz.

The value of gold/money is the best example of using circular logic that there ever could be. Gold is valuable because it is worth money, money is valuable because it is worth gold.

1
Agent777 1 point ago +2 / -1

The queen does not choose the prime minister of Canada. The English have no authority there and Canada does not pay any tribute/taxes to England.

As a Canadian citizen you can Travel through the British common wealth more freely but you still need passports etc. You can get a work visa easier etc but no, Canada is not a part of England any more than the US is still a British colony.

I have dual citizenship to Canada because my mom is from Canada. My grandparents migrated there from Scotland and England after WW2. Yea there is a strong cultural connection, lots of Scottish in BC, but there are lots of Hispanics in California and California was part of of Mexico for a while but that does not continue after they become separate nations.

As a Canadian citizen I can move to England much easier than NJ if I were only American, but it is actually only because I am a Candian citizen with a grandparent from England that would give me special privalege.of.moving back to England.

If I were a Canadian citizen with a grandparent from China, or France England would not allow me the same privilege just because I am Canadian.

0
Agent777 0 points ago +1 / -1

The video a should really be posted at GAW too.

Be hilarious if he got covid again because he screwed up his natural immunity by getting triple vaxxed for no good reason..

1
Agent777 1 point ago +1 / -0

I love that they will go to war and kill people because apparently a few deaths are worth it during that time to ensure years of freedom to follow.

Apparently freedom is that important that they will kill for it.

Then covid comes along and all the sudden your freedom is a total joke because some obese elderly cancer patients started dying, and in the me.of saving a handful of people the took away freedom saying the loss of freedom is worth it if it saves a few lives.

view more: Next ›