Shit has always been this way or worse. Welcome to existence with human civilization

What if China is trying to Redpill western civ?

"Ridiculous Overpriced Amount" - not uncommon in the software business but also subjective language.

"He then invested the money and made more money thru x.com" - instead of what? Blowing it on hookers and drugs? How is that not a good strategy for growing money into more money?

If you're questioning why Musk and not someone else "more qualified", well, there's a lot to unpack there.

1. Investors chose Musk's products and Musk over other products and not Musk. Why? The answer is likely subjective but so is almost everything on an investment level. Investors bet on the prototype and the person behind it. It's never just the product or the person.

2. Even if Musk got help from his parents, so what? Are parents not allowed to help their kids?

3. Consider going long or call options for tsla. You sound like you've lost money betting against tsla.

You attracted bots here.

You claimed it, you can try to prove it. I'd start by not linking to bots.

Wonder if the abortion shit is related

Reddit conspiracy was infiltrated 6 months ago. You screenshotted a bot post.

Carrington events has entered chat

Your last sentence is false.

Legal system was weapinized against men. Partake if you want but you know the risks

You could think of the creator as being materially efficient. If it's just easier for it to be simulated than creating the real thing then go with a simulation.

Also, there's no way to be sure about Nesting- that is, are we currently living in a Simulation that's parts of another simulation or two (or a thousand). Regardless, a creator is still necessary as the foundational creator of the first simulation. Any successive simulation could be an artifact of a non creator though.

I'd go with simulation

First, can you even prove material things actually exist? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Berkeley

One of many methods

All good users got banned permanently a month ago.

I've been seeing this tactic since the beginning of the Biden admin.

I'd also add that society is an iterated prisoners dilemma. The game only continues with cooperation so long as there isn't an end to the game in sight. Once an end is in sight game theory predicts defecting behavior.

This was a test. Plant an article and gauge the reactions of the few that saw it. Next step is to determine whether to roll it out broadly or to find an alternative narrative.

I think it's also fair to say that no one knows for sure what they actually received (assumed they fell for the scam). I think the shots were/are simply an acceleration of continued human experimentation. Most likely they're testing all sorts of shit. Maybe they're looking for a medical link for the likes of the neural links out there. Maybe they're looking for a stronger link to domesticate people more easily. So many possibilities

You realize if Trump had a second term most dems wouldn't have taken the jab. Further, Trump wasn't successful in convincing his followers to take it. Therefore, had Trump gotten his second term far fewer people would be jabbed.

I can't think of too many reasons to participate in society aside from getting something out of it. The only rational approach is to get as much out of it in the least amount of time.

He's basically no different than a social media "influencer". Time to replace him with a fresh one that the kids will relate to more. It's all marketing

We usually get scammed in our earlier years and exploit in our later years.

Society affords one an opportunity to get more out of it than they put in.

THE scam is convincing people that they will. I'd argue that 99% would be better off on their own or a part of a small community of others.

Reddit already banned all the good r/conspiracy users. 95% of comments there are bots now. They've even made it super obvious, as if they're proving to their bosses that it's done.