1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

No I'm not saying, you're saying.

A gyroscope isnt' affected why? Because of self-contained counter spin.

Spin. Rotation

But you know this. Now.

-1
2EyesOpen -1 points ago +2 / -3

"Gimmie that map.."

You mean the earth is flat, but a ship disappears over the horizon?

Fixed. Now try Foucault's Pendulum.

Final answer: The Foucault Pendulum proves that the Earth rotates on its axis through the observation of its changing direction of swing over time, caused by the Coriolis effect resulting from the Earth's rotation.

Why bother putting clocks and lighthouses on top of buildings since they should be seen the same from any distance according to flat earth. Because you would NOT be able to see them otherwise.

But you know this.

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't do a thing but point and you don't do a thing but insult and ignore.

Co-herence is exactly the point.

Still waiting.

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

"What is truth?" asked Pilot, washing his hands.

By seeking in the right places - for the sake of Truth itself. This is how God knows one is seriously seeking Him, as 'salvation'. The answer can not be opposed and this is it's proof.

One might looks for lost keys under the lightpost because he can see better there, but he shouldn't expect much success. Again, It isn't for 'seekers after smooth things'.

'When I was a child, I spake as a child.....'

'....but when they asked how would man be perfect, he took them aside and gave them the secret teaching.' This is the 'one lost sheep' to be sought as opposed to the 99. Who has the Desire - enough to leave the flock to find this 'One'?

Gematria proves that numerals and letters were concurrent developments used to name things including Gods, based from their sig-nificance within ratios of Divine Geometry...God's blueprint for production of life.

These paradigms....they differ by culture and time. They can all be brought together by comparitive religion, showing what is shared. But ONLY IF YOU HAVE THE KEY.

'Ancient Christian Cosmology'.....emphasis on Ancient meaning it came before the flood.

Finding and using the key provides proofs everywhere and everytime it is used.

Q Team understands this and is why Q is 17/The Star/Divine Inspiration as Ideation.

2
2EyesOpen 2 points ago +2 / -0

I know a rat when I see one. ___ Moe Larry Cheese

3
2EyesOpen 3 points ago +3 / -0

So this guy.....he owns this.....Tunneling Company.......but I wouldn't want to bore with the details.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Boring_Company

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +2 / -1

From the god wiki:

'Yon grew up in Winter Haven, Florida, where he essentially raised himself. As a child and as a young adult, he was a prankster who got in trouble for, among other things, making homemade bombs. Other children bullied him repeatedly throughout his childhood, particularly because of his short stature. He went to a local community college and did not express any interest in journalism. After graduation, he enlisted in the United States Army in his late teens for the college money'.

Rimes with Thriller:

'Because of his light blond hair, short stature, and physical boastfulness, other soldiers nicknamed him "Bam Bam" after the Flintstones character. He killed a man in a barroom fight in Ocean City, Maryland in the 1980s; criminal charges were filed but later dropped. Yon's first book, Danger Close, details this event and tells the story of his life up to the age of 20, after he had completed the selection and training process for the United States Army Special Forces. Yon was discharged from the Army in 1987 and worked in a variety of different businesses, and for a while provided security detail for the late pop star Michael Jackson.'

The missing parts are always the best.

A Big Honey 6 beats Jackson 5, ...every........single ........time.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Yon

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Same, Trident gum.

Impossibly sweet without 'sugar'

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ra is emanation. Pha is 'of healing' and EL is God.

Raphael

Tarmal is 'that which is bought or sold or bargained for'.

Rael insinuates a pure female 'lamb' as sacrifice.

Those who will not see the Absolute behind the True nature of forces will attempt to usurp and control them.

What could go wrong.

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now do the Omphalos Stones and globes with spheres that corrrespond to the 'layers' shown, which are actually cosmological explanations of 'dimensional forces'.

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

In which system would you like your answer?

The elohim represent Ideation in pure form, while angels and daemons represent the forces when in dualistic natural/material form.

The source of all is what we'll term God.

Where are worldviews and truths located? That's an irrational question, sorry.

The 'birds in the air' quote suggests they aren't 'in the air' as the orthodox 'heaven' presupposes.

Ideation is like a completed circuit......or a short circuit.......one's 'free will of choice'.

Involution/evolution as returning the charge to the source to complete the circuit.

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Re: read the writings of the Early Church Fathers against the heretics and gnostics would you do that?

Already did that. In fact, a lot of those fathers later became 'heretics' to the orthodoxy. They now are accused of being 'tainted' by gnostic ideas. Interesting that they were the messenger, not the other way around. The gnostic element of Judea was eliminated by mass murder at Massada and later eliminated from formation of the Roman Catholic Church by assassination at the Council of Nicea.

I now have no need for either 'side' of their arguments as they are misrepresented in the first place. The 'winners' by hook get to define the argument and answers both.

A 'borrowed' cult religion by definition. You can deny but it doesn't matter.

Who are these 'The gnostics'?

Gnosis of what? There are 'black' and 'white' understandings.

They too, oppose each other. The white wizards vs the warlocks. Both at 40k.

I claim no membership to any club because one vessel can't hold the ocean it swims in. Gnosis is a stage of development, a higher understanding than agnosis masquerading as 'belief'.

Two sides until conjoined:

Isis is feminine principle - in opposition to its counterpart

Ra is masculine principle - In opposition to its counterpart.

Conjoined as One is EL or Is-ra-el.

And so, Q as Divine Inspiration, 17, as only some KNOW, says "Saving Israel for last".

This includes all the minions of the beast, gnowing and unknowing.

Until the next round.

LOOK for yourSELF. That is in fact the message of both Q and the Bible.

I eventually asked you to read ONE PAGE and bring me some critique.

Failing as a 'seeker after smooth things' as the saying implies.

I've not asserted my convictions. It isn't about anyone's personal convictions anyway.

2
2EyesOpen 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasan-i_Sabbah

https://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/golem.htm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cabinet_of_Dr._Caligari

Still the most 'progressive' movie ever made (along with Metropolis).

Fictionalizing truths.

The Golem is a mythical creature created out of clay that is brought to life. The most famous version of the legend is set in late 16th century Prague. The High Rabbi Lowe, a man learned in kabalistic lore, forms a man-like creature out of clay and then bring it to life by inserting a shem (capsule) with a written magic formula into its mouth. He also writes the German word for truth, anmauth, on its forehead. The Golem, which is given the name Joseph, does the work around the Jewish Quarter of Prague, sweeping the streets, carrying water, splitting wood etc. The Golem was tireless and uncomplaining; it needed neither food nor drink. It was exceedingly strong and fearless and defended the Jewish Quarter from attacks.

The only care required of the Golem was that it must not be alive on the Sabbath (Saturday). Rabbi Lowe deactivated the Golem by removing the shem from its mouth on Friday evenings before the Sabbath began. One Friday evening Rabbi Lowe forgot to remove the shem and Joseph the Golem went berserk. As mentioned above Joseph was very strong; he started pulling up trees. The rabbi ran after Joseph and managed to pull the shem from his mouth thus immobilizing him.

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

There were 'two thieves' on either side of the 'cross/crucifix' of 'christ'.

I attempt to bring Manna to both. Here's a sop:

A circumstance brought me to a discussion about Cognition with a top Cognitive Behavior Psychologist and by relation, with his 'team' of metaphysicists. They had a new theory called String Theory. I asked him to explain. When he'd finished, to make a long story short, I had shown lacking in the theory and offered something to allow it to work. I introduced the concept of spirit into the equation, inserted between 'that which is seen, and that which sees it' the word 'Magic'. Why magic? An invisible middle between all forces exist and that spirit is invisible yet constantly proven/inferred by the two. (thieves).

Micro to macro, one finds the two thieves as science and religion. They are enemies currently and always until the spirit is known, not guessed at or given a number of measurement or a 'name'.

This idea was excitedly accepted and introduced as their own of course. I let them do that, because I knew its fault and wanted no credit had they offered. lol

I was personally thanked, but you know what? They are currently trying now to remove the M (magic/spirit) from the equation, because they and science can't actually define it as a thing, and they don't believe in spirit.

What is known to the gnostic is magic to the agnostic 'believer'.

I fight thieves on both sides of the invisible middle (silence) from which is born the Logos/light, who's 'mantle' is to be worn, Until then, one could only hope to touch the hem of the garment. Let he who has ears hear.

How's the book coming? Read one page.

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Comparative religion Arguments are for people who don't know what they are comparing with, to, or from without this understanding of source.

Actual comparitive religion will discover similarities leading to ultimate truths they share but don't own. I've done it my whole life. I don't suggest it lightly.

Until the true source is found, It becomes 'wise men in the dark' trying to describe an elephant.

Or as the sufic sage might say, "Like spittle from the mouths of fish on dry land."

Creation is made from Ideation first. All things.

Symbols are ideation.

To mistake the symbol for the ideation behind is 'looking at the finger pointing at the moon.'

You know what an argument between the true gnostics of every religion would sound like? Me either because there would be nothing to argue about. There would be a glorious silence instead.

Many paths, one source/destination. Many boats, one shoreline.

Once the shore is reached, one needs to get out of the boat.

See Christ calming The Storm while disciples ride it out in a boat.

Only Divine Inspiration can explain one's attempt to find the highest truths and the proof is in the pudding itself. Not its symbol.

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

The body of Christ consists of those who understand the concept.

'Christianity' is currently different in each head of the 99.

I provided a source. I knew nobody would even look, let alone read, let alone understand. It isn't about a book.

Yes Christianity is a cult religion, who could legitimately deny that? It's only esoteric in the highest of the hierachy. The higher the position, the more that one knows about the esoteric which means knowledge that is 'hidden' in the open from 'the profane'. A term used for the agnostic 'believer'.

The SOURCE of ALL languages.....all numbers/mathematics.....all names of things...Showing the blueprint map of creation aka 'the way/mind of god'. You're right, why should you, of all people, want to see and know and understand that and raise up from the 99?

I asked you to read the book before getting back to avoid the boring back-and-forth. I'm here to show things, not get into lower level arguments. See Elisha/Elijah as the principle of upbraiding the 'Church' by Divine Inspiration (Q/17/The Star).

If you avoid knowledge, it will become your enemy.

2
2EyesOpen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Being the seed of your forebearers (anna/annu as grandmother : See 'nanna/nanny') and naki (grandfather/forebearer).

The Plan is to create the perception of a super-race based off mis and dis-translations, many originating from the fraud named Sitchin.

Part of the Alien Invasion scheme.

-1
2EyesOpen -1 points ago +1 / -2

Try our new Hawk Tuah Coffee for the Descriminating Spitter.

5
2EyesOpen 5 points ago +5 / -0

I was in a Popeye's Chicken once. When I started eating my chicken with a fork, the p.a. music suddenly stopped, causing an eerie silence and everyone turned and stared at me, pointed and whispered. I put my fork down and licked my fingers before holding it in two hands and took a big bite, smiling as I got up and backed out of the door trying hard not to look like I was moon-walking.

Just like that, the p.a. music was back on, and the customers turned their attention back to their own tables. That was a close one.

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

I take it back. That wasn't a total fail at all.

Actually having 2 eyes, each representing 'sides' of perception of One, I chose the name to show how each 'side' needs to come to the One, without misleading with some misread 'Third Eye' nomer.

You stress this by showing the 'ass' of each word that exists.

You admit the One as non-dual, yet use dualism to duel with words.

Again....a needed medicine to some poisons that exist.

I'm curious. Do you have a way to express a connection to/desire for/appreciation of the One, once words fail?

2
2EyesOpen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Regurgitating All In the Family which was a retake of The Honeymooners.

They find a formula and beat it to death.

Now watch old Betty Boop cartoons with fresh eyes.

Especially these two:

Even adrenochrome is there in one. (A ghoul chases Betty Boop in the lab in 'Penthouse' aka how to raise up the pansies.

The "Old Man of the Mountain"... is Hassan i Sabbagh (Google)

Watch for the symbols.

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

. It continues to be practiced practically unchanged for 2000 years.

Disproof:

First men, then animals, then God/Jesus, then doves, now tithes and 'the eucharist'.

CHANGE

You said: "Using Christ's words to contradict His Church's practices, which He personally instantiated and later sent the Holy Spirit to guide the Church and the apostles is ignorant."

Mistaking man's constantly changing interpretation for God's WORD (truth) is what leads to error.

You probably don't realize how each book of the old testament is testament to the failure of the time's religion to come to ultimate truth and so was doomed to CHANGE.

Ignorant. One of us understands what the other is saying. One does not and ignores.

Read the source of what you believe you believe and find the error.

You know......that link you will definitely ignore.

Here it is again:

https://kupdf.net/download/jesus-christ-sun-of-god-ancient-cosmology-and-early-christian-symbolism-by-david-r-fideler-ocr_58a100e36454a7335db1eb87_pdf

Truths can't be disproven. And only Truth is eternally unchangeable.

Christ is what is left after the sacrifice is made.

And you have no lock on quotes or interpretation, know that.

Good luck on your reading.

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Christ didn't sacrifice himself. Now you aren't showing continuity. He was sacrificed by God's plan in literal interpretation, and then man blamed. If you don't offer your SELF to the God of All for its own Reason, magic and its motives won't matter.

If the Christos becomes the Christ and then Jesus Christ who absolves you from both sacrifice of self and sin, the original concept of the Christos and the Chrism are forsaken. During the time of modern Christianity's conception in Rome (Tarsus), gnostic christians called literalists "Seekers after smooth things." Meaning they miss the point by over-simplification.

They had a saying: "If you think heaven is in the sky, the birds in the sky will get there before you."

I've read that book many times over, gaining deeper understanding each time. Now read the one I sent the link to. I predict you won't. That would be a lot simpler.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›