a) What if EN (within) ERGY (ergos; work) implies a division in-between outer and inner, and aether (either) tempts one to ignore that?
b) What if ERGY was before EN can come into being? What if suggesting what IS tempts ones perception to ignore what WAS perceivable?
energy that was captured
What if ongoing ERGY (inception towards death) generates temporary EN (life), which would make capture impossible?
Yet...what if temporal can manipulate one another to ignore the free state (perception) for a captured state (suggestion). What if suggestion can "capture" ones consent for as long as one willingly holds onto it?
energy that was captured through towers
What if only within a decline (inception towards death) can each tower be erected (life)? What if ones ignorance of decline permits another tower to build an arc; bridge; connection; link; junction etc. for harvest?
obelisk
a) OB (towards) EL (God) ISK (of the nature of)...what if the nature of God implies forward motion?
What if tower within decline implies matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion?
b) What if obelisk represents the male (upward triangle); while odalisque represents the female (downward triangle)?
Triforce aka motion > momentum > matter...remember the LINK for capturing energy mentioned earlier?
energy stored
Energy implies process (inception towards death) generating potential (life)...storage implies potential holding onto possession while ignoring process.
What if few tempt many with hiSTORY to sacrifice potential by holding onto possessions like information? Why is it that the merchant who sells (suggestion) possessions for consumers to buy (consent) has a monopoly over storage?
Before storing (suggested) consider supply (perceivable) and demand (perception)...
a) What if EN (within) ERGY (ergos; work) implies a division in-between outer and inner, and aether (either) tempts one to ignore that?
b) What if ERGY was before EN can come into being? What if suggesting what IS tempts ones perception to ignore what WAS perceivable?
What if ongoing ERGY (inception towards death) generates temporary EN (life), which would make capture impossible?
Yet...what if temporal can manipulate one another to ignore the free state (perception) for a captured state (suggestion). What if suggestion can "capture" ones consent for as long as one willingly holds onto it?
What if only within a decline (inception towards death) can each tower be erected (life)? What if ones ignorance of decline permits another tower to build an arc; bridge; connection; link; junction etc. for harvest?
a) OB (towards) EL (God) ISK (of the nature of)...what if the nature of God implies forward motion?
What if tower within decline implies matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion?
b) What if obelisk represents the male (upward triangle); while odalisque represents the female (downward triangle)?
Could the female be hidden within the male... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triforce
Triforce aka motion > momentum > matter...remember the LINK for capturing energy mentioned earlier?
Energy implies process (inception towards death) generating potential (life)...storage implies potential holding onto possession while ignoring process.
What if few tempt many with hiSTORY to sacrifice potential by holding onto possessions like information? Why is it that the merchant who sells (suggestion) possessions for consumers to buy (consent) has a monopoly over storage?
Before storing (suggested) consider supply (perceivable) and demand (perception)...