One cannot counter cultural norms, for it is the counter (table where a money lender does business) who cultivates norms (carpenter's square) by use of a compass.
Countering implies turning against another, hence few using a compass aka compassion (sympathy for the devil) to turn many against each other, like in your example...normal vs abnormal; most vs least; marry vs divorce; happy vs sad; healthy vs unhealthy; white vs black; hard vs easy; stop vs go.
A circle doesn't represent fertile ground to raise any child...it represents sacrificial confinement aka the christian eucharist or the jewish tabernacle. A circle represents a communion (ones coming together).
“they” try so hard to stop you
Stopping you implies ones ignorance of all motion. Ignorance isn't hard to tempt; it's easy to tempt the mind of another to harden itself by holding onto beliefs; ideals; definitions; truths; accounts; stories; illustrations; narratives; tales; norms etc.
Sleight of hand from the X-Files: "i want to believe"...it's the gentiles who want to stop the jewish deconstruction of structure, while ignoring that nature moves, which allows structure (life) only within division (inception towards death).
Nature implies the only force of deconstruction for any artificial structure within. A jew suggests STOP (cessation of motion) as an artificial structure for gentiles to hold onto. Why? To build ignorance within the mind of gentiles, which represents the building of monuments (sepulchre aka tomb; burial place; to embalm; bury).
Notice monu/men - "to think" hence the thought control, and also monu/moneie - "to remind" hence memory turning back on itself. Then also notice MONEIE aka MONEY, which brings one back to the counter of the money lenders aka the beginning of my wall of text.
People evaluate each other as more (plurality) than all (singularity) offers each person within.
souls
Soul aka sole implies "one and only"...plurality implies ones denial of soul.
morality
Mor (variety) al (all) implies the division of each one within all from one another...not two sides turned against each other (good vs bad). Few suggest moralism to tempt many to turn against each other by choosing to hold onto either side.
It's a gotten good
What one got is GOD...viewing it as good or bad turns one side against the other, while distracting from GOD.
Just seems so empty ultimately to me
Setting an ultimatum by forming a final aim or object empties ones mind of purpose aka of what God puts forth.
Few suggest ultimatums to many under the names of...aim; goal; plan; objective; intention; idea (idol); ambition; dream; point; aspiration; target; design; project; mark; hope; fear; desire; pretension; wish; destination; scheme; plot; grail; future; name of the game etc.
Each of the above represents a simple incentivisation by few to tempt many to ignore origin (initiation) for outcome (ultimatum) representing the turning (washing) of the mind by motivating with a reward to tempt others towards punishment.
dreams for future
It's a game of carrot and stick. The carrot represents fiction; the stick represents the consequence of ignoring reality.
There's only now (present)...not before (past) or after (future). Ignoring this corrupts ones presence. Others suggest the future as a carrot, while nature punishing the ignorant dreamer represents the stick.
If one ignores natural for artificial; then one gets punished. Ones presence gets punished by holding onto the past or dreaming about the future.
The most counter culture thing is for a normal man to marry a normal woman and raise happy and healthy children. Especially if you are white.
It is also hard to do, and why “they” try so hard to stop you.
One cannot counter cultural norms, for it is the counter (table where a money lender does business) who cultivates norms (carpenter's square) by use of a compass.
Countering implies turning against another, hence few using a compass aka compassion (sympathy for the devil) to turn many against each other, like in your example...normal vs abnormal; most vs least; marry vs divorce; happy vs sad; healthy vs unhealthy; white vs black; hard vs easy; stop vs go.
A circle doesn't represent fertile ground to raise any child...it represents sacrificial confinement aka the christian eucharist or the jewish tabernacle. A circle represents a communion (ones coming together).
Stopping you implies ones ignorance of all motion. Ignorance isn't hard to tempt; it's easy to tempt the mind of another to harden itself by holding onto beliefs; ideals; definitions; truths; accounts; stories; illustrations; narratives; tales; norms etc.
Sleight of hand from the X-Files: "i want to believe"...it's the gentiles who want to stop the jewish deconstruction of structure, while ignoring that nature moves, which allows structure (life) only within division (inception towards death).
Nature implies the only force of deconstruction for any artificial structure within. A jew suggests STOP (cessation of motion) as an artificial structure for gentiles to hold onto. Why? To build ignorance within the mind of gentiles, which represents the building of monuments (sepulchre aka tomb; burial place; to embalm; bury).
Look at the etymological root of monument... https://www.etymonline.com/word/monument
Notice monu/men - "to think" hence the thought control, and also monu/moneie - "to remind" hence memory turning back on itself. Then also notice MONEIE aka MONEY, which brings one back to the counter of the money lenders aka the beginning of my wall of text.
Not in a multicultural society. It’s why you don’t see anyone volunteering anymore. It’s why “quiet quitting” is an entire generation’s work ethic.
Nope, because the future will be the NWO beast system, 2030 is only a few years away.
You will own nothing and be a happy slave in the near future!
Thank you for being strong, Grant. Despite how bad the world is presently, looking to the past, I agree: In most ways, it’s a gotten good.
People evaluate each other as more (plurality) than all (singularity) offers each person within.
Soul aka sole implies "one and only"...plurality implies ones denial of soul.
Mor (variety) al (all) implies the division of each one within all from one another...not two sides turned against each other (good vs bad). Few suggest moralism to tempt many to turn against each other by choosing to hold onto either side.
What one got is GOD...viewing it as good or bad turns one side against the other, while distracting from GOD.
Setting an ultimatum by forming a final aim or object empties ones mind of purpose aka of what God puts forth.
Few suggest ultimatums to many under the names of...aim; goal; plan; objective; intention; idea (idol); ambition; dream; point; aspiration; target; design; project; mark; hope; fear; desire; pretension; wish; destination; scheme; plot; grail; future; name of the game etc.
Each of the above represents a simple incentivisation by few to tempt many to ignore origin (initiation) for outcome (ultimatum) representing the turning (washing) of the mind by motivating with a reward to tempt others towards punishment.
It's a game of carrot and stick. The carrot represents fiction; the stick represents the consequence of ignoring reality.
There's only now (present)...not before (past) or after (future). Ignoring this corrupts ones presence. Others suggest the future as a carrot, while nature punishing the ignorant dreamer represents the stick.
If one ignores natural for artificial; then one gets punished. Ones presence gets punished by holding onto the past or dreaming about the future.