Would you like the truth? Since you use boilerplates, I'll give you the truth I have to see if you want it.
Jesus actually referred to you babylonian Edomites and Canaanites as Synagogue of Satan. He also told your lying psychopathic Pharisee ancestors that their father is the DEVIL!
Thank you for assuming that I should suffer with these people. The synagogue of satan were not Jews but can be identified by the letters of Ignatius to Smyrna and Philadelphia as a group of wannabe Jews probably including a young Onkelos (who later converted). Babylon, Edom, and Canaan do not have continuing polity despite people being influenced by them. Many Pharisees were sympathetic to Jesus, like Hillel, Joseph, Nicodemus, Gamaliel, Paul, the righteous scribe, and many of the ten thousands of Torah-observant Messianic Jews in Acts 21:20.
It's not true at all STOP LYING, Christians will be hunted down, enslaved and DECAPITATED according to your SATANIC BABYLONIAN TALMUDIC NOAHIDE LAWS!
Of course Christians claim Zech. 8:23 just as Jews do, the interpretation is different though. But whatever the passage says it says to all the righteous. If laws are Noahide then by definition they are to be agreed by all children of Noah, Gentile and Jew both. In the Bible idolators are indeed guilty of capital sin, but the view of Judaism has not been that Christianity is idolatry (except for a very small number of nonrepresentative teachers like Ulla, 4th c.); rather, Christianity is a special case to be treated differently and tolerated for the sanctification of God's name. There is no authoritative Jewish source by which the distortion of Noahide law is drawn; rather it's all just wild inference. Obviously Noah is not Babylonian, nor Talmudic which is a wholly different law and jurisdiction.
You quote two crazed compilations that are mostly not from the Talmud and that are entirely misunderstandings of actual texts, so far from the written text as to be often incomprehensible. (For instance, the nonexistence of "Libbre David" was noted back in 1920.) The first contains a slight bit of material new to me so I will answer it separately. The second is just this graphic and is entirely answerable with facts and accurate quotes (see passages with reference [4]).
TLDR: If you want to criticize Jews or Talmud, do it right. When you misquote you create sympathy for Jews and can be accused of shilling for them. Criticize the superstition and legalism of the actual quotes, not the misquotes that don't represent actual teaching.
[Talmud] permits the slaughter of innocent women and children through dehumanization
No, I looked for it and it goes no further than Biblical passages that Christians accept, where slaughter of innocent women and children is either (1) unintended collateral damage during war, or (2) in one or two cases intended because of evidence of idolatrous collusion by the women and/or minors involved. If morality did not permit collateral damage, anyone could sin with impunity and surround himself with human shields and never be targetable. If morality did not permit trying minors as adults, anyone could direct minors to carry out their crimes and have no penalty. Yes, there's a lot of dehumanization going on in war today, but that's not from established morality.
you can find the noahide laws only in the Babylonian Talmud
No, a version of the Noahite laws was promulgated by the first pope, Peter, at the Jerusalem Council described in Acts 15:20, 29. It too prohibited idolatry but Peter, James, and Paul obviously didn't count themselves idolators!
the Noahide Laws began when President Jimmy Carter signed Education Day USA into Law in 1978
No, that's just the first US proclamation acknowledging they exist, but all Christians accept the Jerusalem Council as binding.
What's the punishment if a Gentile transgresses the Noahide Laws? DEATH!!!
Correct, and according to the Noahide laws that can only be tried by a court of justice established by Noahides i.e. people of all nations together. So no Jew can cause their definition of idolatry to prevail without agreement by the court of all nations.
The nascent Sanhedrin, a modern attempt to revive the ancient Jewish court, views Jesus Christ as a FALSE PROPHET
I've looked closely into this Sanhedrin and found no such ruling.
This is primarily based on the traditional Jewish understanding of Jesus as someone who did not fulfill the criteria
YET.
Ancient Israelites = /= modern day "jews"
Yes, modern Jews are a subset descended continuously from Yehudah. (English Jew, from French Ju, from Latin Judaeus, from Hebrew Yehudah.)
the Bible doesn't explicitly state that you will have 2800 "subhuman" slaves when your nachash moshiach (antichrist) comes
No, that's an interpretation. It says in Zech. 8:23 that "ten men shall take hold out of all languages of the nations, even shall take hold of the skirt of [me] that is a [spiritual] Jew, saying, We will go with you: for we have heard that God is with you." Christians are "spiritual Jews". Nachash isn't related at all to moshiach.
Please show me where i misqouted
Gladly. Most obviously, you wrote above, "Jesus is in hell and is being punished by being immersed in boiling semen", when semen is not in the quote you cited (semen is referred to Balaam instead, who is different from the Yeshu mentioned). Further, the "Yeshu" is generic and conflates three or more people named "Yeshu" in the Talmud; it's not about fiery "hell" as we call it but about tzoah rotachat, a compartment of sheol; it's not about present punishment but is regarded as punishment with respite; it doesn't say the Yeshu is being punished but that he speaks of the punishment; and it doesn't speak of immersion. I'll be happy to put you down as getting the quote correct the second time, but the interpretation is still complex context, as I linked.
The Sabbatean's "sympathy" victim card is long expired
I have questions related to these quotes between you two:
What's the punishment if a Gentile transgresses the Noahide Laws? DEATH!!!
Correct, and according to the Noahide laws that can only be tried by a court of justice established by Noahides i.e. people of all nations together. So no Jew can cause their definition of idolatry to prevail without agreement by the court of all nations.
What if there is a 'league of nations' possibly 10 Kingdoms united in a new world order that do decree their version of Noahide laws?
I think that could fit in with end times prophecy inasmuch as the laws as Christians understand them would be bastardized in the technical sense as without the Father, who Christians know as God.
Edit: should have added u/Third-Eye-Vision (please let me know if this chime goes thru because it's an edit)
It'd be just like any of several prior empires that criminalized the covenant people, declaring themselves the representatives of humanity (i.e. of Noahides). Nothing new.
Yes, I think the future holds an empire persecuting Christianity both directly and indirectly just as we see presently given the literal persecution in ~60 countries and the indirect persecution we permit in the West via legal and cultural manipulation. Christians are already being beheaded regularly, no need for LaHaye and Jenkins to mistranslate anything. The goal of consolidating power free from Christian influence so that Christians can be further persecuted is always part of the same war.
Would you like the truth? Since you use boilerplates, I'll give you the truth I have to see if you want it.
Thank you for assuming that I should suffer with these people. The synagogue of satan were not Jews but can be identified by the letters of Ignatius to Smyrna and Philadelphia as a group of wannabe Jews probably including a young Onkelos (who later converted). Babylon, Edom, and Canaan do not have continuing polity despite people being influenced by them. Many Pharisees were sympathetic to Jesus, like Hillel, Joseph, Nicodemus, Gamaliel, Paul, the righteous scribe, and many of the ten thousands of Torah-observant Messianic Jews in Acts 21:20.
Of course Christians claim Zech. 8:23 just as Jews do, the interpretation is different though. But whatever the passage says it says to all the righteous. If laws are Noahide then by definition they are to be agreed by all children of Noah, Gentile and Jew both. In the Bible idolators are indeed guilty of capital sin, but the view of Judaism has not been that Christianity is idolatry (except for a very small number of nonrepresentative teachers like Ulla, 4th c.); rather, Christianity is a special case to be treated differently and tolerated for the sanctification of God's name. There is no authoritative Jewish source by which the distortion of Noahide law is drawn; rather it's all just wild inference. Obviously Noah is not Babylonian, nor Talmudic which is a wholly different law and jurisdiction.
You quote two crazed compilations that are mostly not from the Talmud and that are entirely misunderstandings of actual texts, so far from the written text as to be often incomprehensible. (For instance, the nonexistence of "Libbre David" was noted back in 1920.) The first contains a slight bit of material new to me so I will answer it separately. The second is just this graphic and is entirely answerable with facts and accurate quotes (see passages with reference [4]).
TLDR: If you want to criticize Jews or Talmud, do it right. When you misquote you create sympathy for Jews and can be accused of shilling for them. Criticize the superstition and legalism of the actual quotes, not the misquotes that don't represent actual teaching.
No, I looked for it and it goes no further than Biblical passages that Christians accept, where slaughter of innocent women and children is either (1) unintended collateral damage during war, or (2) in one or two cases intended because of evidence of idolatrous collusion by the women and/or minors involved. If morality did not permit collateral damage, anyone could sin with impunity and surround himself with human shields and never be targetable. If morality did not permit trying minors as adults, anyone could direct minors to carry out their crimes and have no penalty. Yes, there's a lot of dehumanization going on in war today, but that's not from established morality.
No, a version of the Noahite laws was promulgated by the first pope, Peter, at the Jerusalem Council described in Acts 15:20, 29. It too prohibited idolatry but Peter, James, and Paul obviously didn't count themselves idolators!
No, that's just the first US proclamation acknowledging they exist, but all Christians accept the Jerusalem Council as binding.
Correct, and according to the Noahide laws that can only be tried by a court of justice established by Noahides i.e. people of all nations together. So no Jew can cause their definition of idolatry to prevail without agreement by the court of all nations.
I've looked closely into this Sanhedrin and found no such ruling.
YET.
Yes, modern Jews are a subset descended continuously from Yehudah. (English Jew, from French Ju, from Latin Judaeus, from Hebrew Yehudah.)
No, that's an interpretation. It says in Zech. 8:23 that "ten men shall take hold out of all languages of the nations, even shall take hold of the skirt of [me] that is a [spiritual] Jew, saying, We will go with you: for we have heard that God is with you." Christians are "spiritual Jews". Nachash isn't related at all to moshiach.
Gladly. Most obviously, you wrote above, "Jesus is in hell and is being punished by being immersed in boiling semen", when semen is not in the quote you cited (semen is referred to Balaam instead, who is different from the Yeshu mentioned). Further, the "Yeshu" is generic and conflates three or more people named "Yeshu" in the Talmud; it's not about fiery "hell" as we call it but about tzoah rotachat, a compartment of sheol; it's not about present punishment but is regarded as punishment with respite; it doesn't say the Yeshu is being punished but that he speaks of the punishment; and it doesn't speak of immersion. I'll be happy to put you down as getting the quote correct the second time, but the interpretation is still complex context, as I linked.
Correct.
I have questions related to these quotes between you two:
What if there is a 'league of nations' possibly 10 Kingdoms united in a new world order that do decree their version of Noahide laws?
I think that could fit in with end times prophecy inasmuch as the laws as Christians understand them would be bastardized in the technical sense as without the Father, who Christians know as God.
Edit: should have added u/Third-Eye-Vision (please let me know if this chime goes thru because it's an edit)
It'd be just like any of several prior empires that criminalized the covenant people, declaring themselves the representatives of humanity (i.e. of Noahides). Nothing new.
Yes, I think the future holds an empire persecuting Christianity both directly and indirectly just as we see presently given the literal persecution in ~60 countries and the indirect persecution we permit in the West via legal and cultural manipulation. Christians are already being beheaded regularly, no need for LaHaye and Jenkins to mistranslate anything. The goal of consolidating power free from Christian influence so that Christians can be further persecuted is always part of the same war.