a) "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Matthew 23:9 Putting a THE (theos; god) before FATHER implies an imposter...
b) Sacrifice implies "offering"; animal implies "all animation" aka all offering animation through each animated one within. It's putting the labels "animal" and "sacrifice" upon one another which distracts from God.
c) Same (animation) generating difference (animated) implies sacrifice...LIKE implies a self sacrifice of being differentiated from one another by choosing to behave like one another.
God divines aka makes private (apart)...not common (alike).
a) Entity implies each being within God. Only within God (motion) can flowing abstract (momentum) form entity (matter).
b) Old Testament versus New Testament implies a circular conflict among differences turning against one another, hence making them ALIKE one another. Old vs new implies the mutual destruction of different entities, and it's based on a test/teks (to weave) of ment (mind) aka few weaving the minds of many together into a conflict.
c) "The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no NEW thing under the sun." ~Ecclesiastes 1:9
New implies the inversion of now, within which one old/al (to grow; nourish) aka God nourishing growth now....not before (old) or after (new). If one chooses new or old, then one ignores now aka living within k-NOW-ledge.
Maybe that's why Jesus was praying to the Father and not the god of the OT. When Jesus said, "I and the father are one," he was not claiming to be Yahweh. He was describing his consciousness in complete synthesis with the ultimate source beyond all creation.
I'm surprised you don't know this. In Gnostic belief systems, Jesus prayed to the Father (Monad) as the ultimate, ineffable source of all being, often referred to as the "God above God" or Bythos, distinct from the lesser creator deity known as the Demiurge (aka Yahweh in the OT). Gnostics viewed the Monad as a singular, formless essence without name, emotion, or form, from which all spiritual emanations (Aeons) flow, including the Christ spirit. That's what many of the early Christians believed as well.
The Father of Jesus likes to sacrifice animals and enjoys the scent of their blood poured on a burning hot altar. Amirite?
a) "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Matthew 23:9 Putting a THE (theos; god) before FATHER implies an imposter...
b) Sacrifice implies "offering"; animal implies "all animation" aka all offering animation through each animated one within. It's putting the labels "animal" and "sacrifice" upon one another which distracts from God.
c) Same (animation) generating difference (animated) implies sacrifice...LIKE implies a self sacrifice of being differentiated from one another by choosing to behave like one another.
God divines aka makes private (apart)...not common (alike).
Set apart-Holy
The other way...from holy (whole) towards partial aka cause setting effect into position.
Better to try to be Holy then, I think.
ot god and nt god are different entities
How so?
a) Entity implies each being within God. Only within God (motion) can flowing abstract (momentum) form entity (matter).
b) Old Testament versus New Testament implies a circular conflict among differences turning against one another, hence making them ALIKE one another. Old vs new implies the mutual destruction of different entities, and it's based on a test/teks (to weave) of ment (mind) aka few weaving the minds of many together into a conflict.
c) "The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no NEW thing under the sun." ~Ecclesiastes 1:9
New implies the inversion of now, within which one old/al (to grow; nourish) aka God nourishing growth now....not before (old) or after (new). If one chooses new or old, then one ignores now aka living within k-NOW-ledge.
Maybe that's why Jesus was praying to the Father and not the god of the OT. When Jesus said, "I and the father are one," he was not claiming to be Yahweh. He was describing his consciousness in complete synthesis with the ultimate source beyond all creation.
Where do you find this?
I'm surprised you don't know this. In Gnostic belief systems, Jesus prayed to the Father (Monad) as the ultimate, ineffable source of all being, often referred to as the "God above God" or Bythos, distinct from the lesser creator deity known as the Demiurge (aka Yahweh in the OT). Gnostics viewed the Monad as a singular, formless essence without name, emotion, or form, from which all spiritual emanations (Aeons) flow, including the Christ spirit. That's what many of the early Christians believed as well.