Whoops
(media.scored.co)
Comments (18)
sorted by:
To be fair, this is a filing by (I presume) the defense attorney throwing anything at the wall and seeing what sticks.
What if ------ it wasn't a bullet?
If i ever kill someone with a 9mm I'll be sure to leave a .45 with my fingerprints at the scene.
Use a 45 long Colt round in a 410 shotgun. I advise using a single shot type 410
That doesn’t mean it came from a different rifle or caliber, it means the bullet jacket was too fragmented to be conclusive.
If you ever want to be depressed, look up how many people got falsely imprisoned on "100% conclusive, trust us guys" wink nudge FBI ballistics matches.
I saw one yesterday about fingerprinting. The dude says there's like 250 or 300 match sites on a fingerprint and to "verify identity" they need 6 to match.
So if 6 spots match ○ and 244 ● don't match ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●○●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●○●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●○●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●○●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●○●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●○●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
That's a positive ID, that's a conviction.
There was no bullet.
Looks like that to me.
Spoiler alert, there was no charlie.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15692625/Tyler-Robinson-bullet-rifle-match-Charlie-Kirk.html The headline is deliberately misleading. Read the article for yourself before drawing a conclusion
Yeah utter clickbait.
I've had people say "I don't really read the news, I know it's untrustworthy, I just skim the headlines"
I'm like, the BIGGEST lies are the headlines typically.
Skimming headlines is the absolute worst thing you could do. Relying on a single news source like Fox News but reading the articles would probably be better than sticking to 10 conservative leaning outlets and reading only the headlines.
The headlines are only about what thing. Getting clicks no matter the cost to integrity or morality.
Thanks for posting the link. I meant to, but got distracted.
However the headline seems to be accurate. The court filing claims that the bullet is not a match for the rifle. Specifically they are saying the ATF couldn't match the bullet to the rifle and they will use this as part of the defense.
What if there was a second person.
Was Charlie wearing a pager?
Nope but I wouldn't want the mic anywhere near me...
They[local police a law enforcement] couldn't even find the firearm, despite using gun powder sniffing dogs. They only found the rifle after the FBI showed up. Did the FBI plant the evidence? of course they did.
Nonsense. Psyop phase 2... There was no bullet.
Rewatch the video. Look at the mic device. Watch all of CK's security.
No shit.