You were censored for your attack on the user, your argument was kept intact and now we are continuing debating your argument, which I think is hypocritcal.

If you claim the right to criminalize children because you believe Jews criminalize children, yes, that's hypocrisy. You need to hold yourself to a higher standard than those you declare enemies.

If you were to claim the moral right to execute children as the result of a tribunal judgment upon a race, that would be different and instead of appealing to the Jews as standards for your behavior you'd appeal to your own circumspection. That's what the Swamp Rangers do: we are willing to judge whole classes of people as Swamp Creatures as long as the judgment and crimes are public. The Bible indicates that there are rare times when even the children can be judged but it is for their own behavior (unless they are casualties of war, which is quite different from "it's the Jews"). So you don't seem to be acting out of moral right but out of emulation.

You say caring more about Jewish children than white children is a crime, and you say my efforts to obtain moderation for this forum were a crime. That would be fine because then you could hold me criminal instead of the Jews. I learned from Paul how to suffer on behalf of others. But you're not stating any crime any Jew has committed. You can't even say Kissinger got JFK killed, let alone that all Jewish toddlers are complicit. So your failing to produce crimes suggests that your judgment may be a trifle rash here. (Speaking of which, I defend all groups against unjust criticism equally, and I defend all attempts to obtain consensus about this forum equally, so your judgments there are questionable too.)

I keep hoping you'll advance the discussion by proposing a tribunal. For instance, let's check in on the ICC, South Africa v. Israel: oh look, Israel has now answered in court (as of 2026-03-14) for charges of genocide, so the proceeding is ongoing. Why not agree to hear the ICC's eventual ruling before making your own judgment? Or why not say, as others do here, that being indoctrinated into Rabbinical Judaism is a crime in itself because a child should know better than to get a bar mitzvah? To say "it's the Jews" when the very pertinent "it's the satanists" is available seems imbalanced. Were you going to give a name for what happened prior to 1793 BC? Were there Jews before Judah and if so how do they retroactively earn a name that didn't exist yet? What tribe are they, Semite (what about before Shem), Noachite, Adamite?

I think you are being the hypocritical one.