Meanwhile you cannot criticize the jEW online without fearing being tracked. You cannot criticize them IRL without suffering some sort of consequences, usually legal. You cannot be a famous figure new to the JQ and criticize (((them))), or you get killed like JFK or Kirk or Michel Jackson. They try to pass endless anti-semotismsmsmsmsmssmsmzzzpspspspsps bills. They make it illegal in countries like Canada to criticize their precious exaggerated "hollowcast". You must use euphemisms and references in censored areas out of fear. You have to fear being banned. You can bash "nazis" and even openly desire "nazis" or Whites to be DEAD and there'll be little if any backlash. But so much as name the jEW and you're hated. They censor WAR FOOTAGE, since they are being bombed by Iran. And on and on and on.
Comments (14)
sorted by:
Nazis are jealous that Jews get to freely be nazis. Neither are good.
Of course Nazis censor. They also subjugate, they abuse and dehumanize other groups, they put themselves up on a pedestal. This is the sin of pride at work.
Correct. This point should be stressed more. People are too stupid to spot false dichotomies, sadly.
Examples?
Isn't that just Juice's projection?
It almost doesn't need an example. The alternative is to believe the Nazis were the first authoritarian regime in history to allow free speech and descent against the state.
It was a one party state, so the censorship is baked into the cake.
No it's a pattern that sinful man repeats over and over again.
For nazis specifically their propaganda is rather blatant dehumanization. Jews are rats, Blacks are monkeys.
Or look at US propaganda when they target an enemy. Middle easterners become "sand niggers", "terrorists", "towel heads", "goat fuckers", "pedophiles". Another form of dehumanization.
Nope. They are angry they want to take their right to be so for themselves away. Correctly so imo.
Thank your god rule1 doesn't apply to dead people, huh?
Everything I said was true and I don't see a single thing refuted.
is not a proper sentence.
One of the fastest ways to get more downvotes here is to complain about a single downvote. I gave you a downvote, but my primary reason was that you didn't provide a cognizable conspiracy.
Another user just noted how much there is today of people complaining Jews censor all criticism of them, oblivious to how they are complaining uncensored. I affirmed him by noting "It's the satanists". I thought you were of the same kind when you implied "It's the Catholics and Jews", which is close enough to negotiate.
All countries censor war footage.
There were a couple people here regularly calling for death of Nazis, the new mod dealt with them swiftly at the same time and in the same way as those calling for death of Jews.
Why don't you name the Jew for real (Henry Kissinger contributed to JFK's death, Jonathan Goldblatt lobbies for legislation against anti-Semitism)? People might get the idea that you are fearful, while you are criticizing those who are fearful. They might get the idea that you are a fed shill (a glowie) because you're seeking to get others to be specific where you're being generic.
Just tips if you want to fit in. You won't get banned for content here, but you might get banned for attacking people without evidence if you do it often enough.
This guy thinks jeffrey epstein did nothing wrong
I downvoted this comment to remind you about rule 1 even it's not direct. Users are free to upvote or downvote as they please, this is 'Scored', right?
I called he/she/it a downvoter. Did they downvote? Yes. Accurate statements aren't ad hominems.
Yes a downvoter, to say a coinclipper (does that even work anymore?), and a non white male implies an attack at that person and not their argument.
Public coinbase running on private servers for a cut...
Exactly! The entire system is set up around "clipping" or getting a cut. It's how to run a business
Ah so..