Templar crosses. An expression of papal loyalty.
(media.scored.co)
Comments (177)
sorted by:
Hegeseth is larping as a crusader and isn’t Catholic.
Correct. He is a shabbo Goy who licks Isn'treali boot.
Oh, here you are admitting that people who worship jews aren’t Christian. So you instantaneously destroyed your own claims in the other conversation. Perfect; thanks for conceding the argument and admitting you’re only here to lie.
Ah yes, because having an opinion about a race/religion you don't like makes someone a "not Christian". No, but it does make them ignorant.
Straw Man!
Not what happened.
Nope, you directly contradicted yourself from the other conversation thread.
Nope
"Some opinions are wrong." "Not what happened." "What?"
Catholics condemns unjust war. This war is satanic.
This war is a smoke curtain going for oil and power
Deciding to be a Crusader for Christ does not mandate being Catholic as a prerequisite. If you stand for the Cross of Christ, I'll have you at my shoulder.
Protestant, Catholic, Orthodox, as long as you believe Christ is God, was the son of God, died for our Sins, and is King of Kings and Lord of Lords, we can have brotherhood. Every other debate or gripe is just Iron sharpening Iron.
"And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?" 2 Corinthians 6:15
I will give my all working for God's kingdom, but that includes calling out the evils of Catholicism.
I actually do agree with you, but is that the fault of the Catholic masses, or their leadership, (which believe me, I do have problems with)? Just trying to post an olive branch, sorry to offend you. May Christ Bless you.
If you look into word studies the word catholic actually means universal:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_(term)
Now if I were the devils I would work hard to corrupt that, just say'n.
To repeat what I often say elsewhere, the Bible uses the root expression, kath holes ("all-throughout"), to refer to the church throughout all the world. I would also call it "cataholistic" if that were understandable.
I find it very helpful!
Thanks for checking in with us Brother Alpha!
Nah, the list is way longer than that. It all flows from that, but your permissiveness is why Christendom doesn’t exist anymore.
I'm just trying to provide a a common rail for Christian commonality and dialogue. I apologize that I fail to live up to your standard of what a Christian should be. May Christ Bless you.
It’s correct, it’s just not complete. You can’t tolerate the intolerable.
Ok, Educate me. Being sincere and coming to you humbly in question. Are Catholics intolerable or is Catholic dogma intolerable to you? As a Protestant I honestly find them "going through middle management" to pray to God unnecessary as I do veneration of Mary, (I mean she was a great lady and all that but her function was as a vessel nothing further) but beyond that, I'm not going to throw the baby out with the bathwater, spiritually speaking.
If you can tell yourself the Bible is lying to you about “there is only one way to heaven” and “no one was sinless except Christ,” you can tell yourself anything about anything.
It’s just not acceptable.
Is that what they believe?
Bravo!
Catholics are heavily infiltrated, as we all are. Catholics have the job of purifying themselves, as we all do.
Amen.
It will never work.
"It's only one single group, there is only one group of bad guys in all of existence!"
lol
Find another website, handshake. You’re powerless here.
Strawman? Which is what you initially did?
Nope.
You're here for one hour and already defend the jews? Go away.
HAHAHAHAHAAHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
lol
Okay, you can stay for a bit. You’re fun.
Says the one claiming I "defended" the shekelsniffers.
It was a strawman because you didn't want to admit higher up catholics are part of the Blob too.
"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." ~Matthew 23:9-11
Any loyalty to a father upon the earth implies treason to the one in heaven...
Deus (God) implies need; Vult (will) implies want...one needs to resist want; others suggest to lo and behold want, while ignoring need.
The five-fold cross deceives one to ignore that there's only one flow A-CROSS (inception towards death) for each form (life) within. The other four imply the crossing out of circumference for the centered one, which represents the rite of circumcision.
Jeru-salem aka yarah (he threw) shalom (peace) implies whole throwing each peace/piece across aka the transference of matter (life) within motion (inception towards death).
Hey ummm handshake HARZKP814?
“ALMOST AS IF TRUTH STAYS THE SAME. HUH.” Right.
Truth stays the same. Which is exactly why dragging accusations from completely different centuries and pretending they all describe the same people is not truth. It is you stitching together whatever you can find and calling it a worldview. 🤣
“BEFORE 70 AD. SO YOU’RE JUST REINFORCING MY POINT.”
Yeah, amazing point. Paul dealt with Jewish communities before 70 AD… and somehow they all vanished and got replaced by impostors right after. History just hit a reset button because your theory needed it to. Brilliant. 🤣
“HOW SO?”
Because those same Jewish communities did not disappear. They continued. That is how history works. Populations do not get swapped out like game skins. 🤣
“A BAAL STATUE WAS BURNT AND THEY SCREECHK VETCHED OVER IT!”
Ah yes. The gold standard of historical analysis. One random internet clip equals proof of secret Baal worship. Forget thousands of years of documented theology. 🤣
You saw a video. Case closed. 🤣
“SINCE WHEN HAS CHABAD OR AIPAC EVER SPOKEN OUT AGAINST THOSE?”
Yes, when I think of ancient Near Eastern idolatry, my first thought is modern political lobbying groups. Totally the same category. Not a completely gormless comparison at all. 🤣🤣🤣
“OKAY, WHAT DO THEY SAY? HINT: NOT TALKING ABOUT THE OLD TESTAMENT.”
Right, because Judaism definitely abandoned the Hebrew Scriptures and secretly teaches Baal worship now. You just cannot find it anywhere except in memes and comment sections. 🤣
“NO, THAT IS A STRAWMAN. IT IS JEWS WHO STRUGGLE WITH NUANCE…”
You just spent paragraphs blaming an entire group across centuries and now you are lecturing about nuance. That is rich. 🤣🤣🤣
“SO WHY WOULD THEY BLAME JUCE AND NOT SOMEONE ELSE?”
Because minorities have historically been easy scapegoats. This is not complicated. It has happened to multiple groups across history. But apparently that concept only works when it fits your narrative. RIGHT?
“OH BUT MEDIEVAL ACCUSATIONS AGAINST MUSLIMS AND MODERN POLITICS ARE RELATABLE.”
You keep doing the exact same OLD RUSTY thing and acting like it proves something. Medieval accusation. Modern grievance. Blend. Repeat. 🤣
“THAT’S LIKE SAYING ISLAMIC JIHAD ISN’T RELATED TO MUSLIMS.”
No, it is like saying you cannot blame every Muslim across all centuries for everything done by anyone claiming that label. Same principle. Not hard bruv.
“WHY DO I NOT SEE ANY OF THE USUAL PRO-JEW GUYS POINT OUT ANYTHING NEGATIVE JEWS DO?”
Because criticizing specific actions is different from inventing a centuries-spanning conspiracy blob and calling it truth. 🤣🤣🤣
“I TOUCHED ON THIS ONE TOO.” You “touched on it” by ignoring what it says. BIGLY!!
Romans 11:17–18 (Amplified Bible) “But if some of the branches were broken off… do not boast against the branches… it is not you who supports the root, but the root that supports you.”
That is a warning to Gentiles. Not a ban on criticism. Not a license for your rant. A warning about arrogance. Which you walked straight into. 🤣🤣🤣
“WHO IS DOING BOASTING… WHAT ABOUT NETANYAHU…”
There it is. From Scripture straight to modern politics in one jump. Every time. Moronic.
“THE WEST AND WHITES HAVE DUMPED INFINITY HELP…”
And now we are fully off the rails. Theology, geopolitics, culture war, everything is someone else’s fault. Right on schedule. 🤣
“SO CALLING CENTURIES OF DISCONNECTED ACCUSATIONS ‘FACTS’…”
Exactly. You ALMOST got it. That is literally what you are doing. Taking unrelated events across centuries and pretending they are one continuous proof. Also Moronic.
“LIKE ACCUSATIONS AGAINST COMMUNISTS…”
No. Because communism is a defined political ideology. You are talking about an entire people across thousands of years and pretending it is one unified actor.
Your whole method is simple. Childlike. Grab something medieval. Grab something modern. Add a conspiracy. Call it truth. 🤣
That is not analysis bruv. That is just another gormless rant dressed up like one. 🤣