Of course I don't use this card with you or real anti-Semites here, Skil, because you have a pattern of getting your facts and sources mostly right. I picked on you once for facts and sources as to extinction, and again as to young earth, and you responded very rationally. The trump card is reserved for people who refuse to listen to reason; when that happens I find that their unreason is totally blown apart by my accusing them of being Jews larping against themselves. Read again: there are "insane anti-Semites" and sane ones.
Irrational "anti-Semite" accounts always in my experience refuse to deal with the fact that they harm anti-Semitism. Irrational "monotheist" accounts always in my experience refuse to confirm or deny being Muslim, because I believe it's impossible for a Muslim to deny being Muslim in good conscience. OTOH, once I realized that I was getting accused myself, I told people I'm going to stop denying being Jewish and instead (being all things to all men) agree to suffer alongside the Jews, as Jesus did. (And that card also always works, because people can't make hay out of my identification because it proves that they're acting on no evidence and that it wouldn't matter to them if I were Jewish or not.) So the refusal to deal with an identity question is 100% a tell of larping, while at the same time I discovered that if I lean into dealing with the identity question by identifying with the accused class that is the best evidence I can give for being sincere and transparent.
My post history proves you wrong.
In this comment you make a couple generic swipes against "Jews" but decline to cite specifics such as saying Brooklyn rabbis like Yechiel Brauner and Yoel Malik "rape children institutionally"; but it takes 30 seconds to construct such a sentence. You also decline to note my regular statement that I worship exactly one Jew because you dismiss Jesus from being King of the Jews, IIRC (nor the recognition that the Angel of the LORD calls himself a satan, which is necessary context to statements about it). So while you do occasionally call out individuals, your post history trends toward the generic that doesn't build the case.
Yeah, we do that literally every single day. Citations and sources. Direct quotes. You have nothing.
In my experience 85%-90% of Talmud references here are not on its own terms but are failures of interpretation. I've contextualized those. When people get it right I often say nothing. I don't recall you being outside this trend.
The things I always call out when I see them, you mean?
I don't know what you mean by that. I meant the person who is listed repeatedly in the most recent position here. Nothing to do with you or your style. If you were unwilling to listen to the reason of this statement, you might indicate a desire to trend toward that, though.
We don’t really see that anymore, though, do we? Not outside of meatspace. They’ll false flag their synagogues with swastikas that have Hebrew character serifs on them, but their digital space has been far more productive by shilling for themselves, not against.
And hell, how could they even do that anymore? All of their own websites automatically ban jew hatred by algorithm! They’d get shadowbanned by themselves.
Next time one pops up, ping me in a followup comment. I’m curious now.
Of course I don't use this card with you or real anti-Semites here, Skil, because you have a pattern of getting your facts and sources mostly right. I picked on you once for facts and sources as to extinction, and again as to young earth, and you responded very rationally. The trump card is reserved for people who refuse to listen to reason; when that happens I find that their unreason is totally blown apart by my accusing them of being Jews larping against themselves. Read again: there are "insane anti-Semites" and sane ones.
Irrational "anti-Semite" accounts always in my experience refuse to deal with the fact that they harm anti-Semitism. Irrational "monotheist" accounts always in my experience refuse to confirm or deny being Muslim, because I believe it's impossible for a Muslim to deny being Muslim in good conscience. OTOH, once I realized that I was getting accused myself, I told people I'm going to stop denying being Jewish and instead (being all things to all men) agree to suffer alongside the Jews, as Jesus did. (And that card also always works, because people can't make hay out of my identification because it proves that they're acting on no evidence and that it wouldn't matter to them if I were Jewish or not.) So the refusal to deal with an identity question is 100% a tell of larping, while at the same time I discovered that if I lean into dealing with the identity question by identifying with the accused class that is the best evidence I can give for being sincere and transparent.
In this comment you make a couple generic swipes against "Jews" but decline to cite specifics such as saying Brooklyn rabbis like Yechiel Brauner and Yoel Malik "rape children institutionally"; but it takes 30 seconds to construct such a sentence. You also decline to note my regular statement that I worship exactly one Jew because you dismiss Jesus from being King of the Jews, IIRC (nor the recognition that the Angel of the LORD calls himself a satan, which is necessary context to statements about it). So while you do occasionally call out individuals, your post history trends toward the generic that doesn't build the case.
In my experience 85%-90% of Talmud references here are not on its own terms but are failures of interpretation. I've contextualized those. When people get it right I often say nothing. I don't recall you being outside this trend.
I don't know what you mean by that. I meant the person who is listed repeatedly in the most recent position here. Nothing to do with you or your style. If you were unwilling to listen to the reason of this statement, you might indicate a desire to trend toward that, though.
We don’t really see that anymore, though, do we? Not outside of meatspace. They’ll false flag their synagogues with swastikas that have Hebrew character serifs on them, but their digital space has been far more productive by shilling for themselves, not against.
And hell, how could they even do that anymore? All of their own websites automatically ban jew hatred by algorithm! They’d get shadowbanned by themselves.
Next time one pops up, ping me in a followup comment. I’m curious now.