Definitely true that the axis “Boomer vs. Zoomer” is being used to divide us all, though it’s not for the overly simplified reason stated in the post, but instead it’s just one of MANY axes being used to divide (and conquer) us. Just like Man vs Woman, “conservative” vs “progressive”, etc etc
In a sense, the post is right, this is being done to silo and isolate groups and prevent them from sharing information and goals. Just important to note the similar things being done on basically every “front” or potential axis of division.
“Boomer vs. Zoomer” is being used to divide us all
Versus/verto - "to turn" implies turning against one another aka together aka united in conflict. It's the state of each one within all, which implies division from one another.
If one chooses any side, then one turns against the other.
To be more specific...turning implies within a cycle; being (life) implies within delineation (inception towards death). To invert natural delineation; few shape artificial cycles inside (logic) and outside (reason) of many.
What's another word for instruction? https://www.etymonline.com/word/Talmud Notice furthermore that a mason calls it a cyclopedia...cause a free-mason ain't in (en) it.
simplified reason
Reasoning implies complex vs complex to reach simplicity...
one of MANY axes being used to divide (and conquer) us.
Axe implies "to split; divide"...many implies unification of one with one another, while ignoring that being one implies division from one another.
The label "us" unites divided ones into many, which is how effortless few conquer many by simply suggesting a label of collectivization.
On a larger scale..."us" implies uniting states aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka mosaic law.
Just like...
Just implies balance, like vs dislike implies imbalance...if ones free will of choice chooses one side over the other.
similar things being done on basically every “front”
Nature fronts (inception towards death) being (life)...few tempt many with artificial sides to front each other, while ignoring nature.
The suggestion "go the front-line" tempts one to ignore being (life) fronted (inception towards death) within a line.
Line implies basis for any shape within....logic (circular thinking) turning into reason (circular conflict) represents abstracts shaped within base.
How could life not use its inception towards death life-line aka the way of all for each one within?
How does inception towards death not implicate each ones life in-between?
bot
What bot can adapt to perceivable inspiration on the fly?
try to impersonate
Im (within) per (by) sonate (sound) implies a trial for each one within aka the TRI (threefold) separation of AL (all) into each one within aka inception>life>death.
Now try to find a bot who could write that without contradicting itself...
Inception towards death implies each ones entire life from beginning towards end...like how the fuck could a mere 5 years of talking even compare to that, dude?
Would you like me to switch to form (life) within flow (inception towards death) or temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death) or resistance (life) within temptation (inception towards death) or matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion?
I know its true because "ok boomer" began as a scripted response used by the paid ShareBlue shills on Reddit in 2015 not long after about 100 of them brigaded the conspiracy forum pushing the fake "piss tape" attack with brand-new accounts made that same day. Most of those brand-new Blueshare shills became permanent fixtures in that sub, and "ok boomer" was one of their favorite phrases of dismissal
Yes. Also, giving names to generations is likely a psyop in itself. It's a classic Divide and Conquer. Alienate groups of people from each other and keep them apart. The more various division lines there are the easier masses can be controlled and manipulated.
I always say we all would have done the same thing boomers did. Buy cheap r.e. as investment properties,cetc et .... Like the Gen zers aren't "selfish".
I think people prior to WWII would have had more foresight and understanding of the importance of tightening their belts so that things can be better for themselves and younger generations in the future. And cared more about those future generations. But you're right that generations have been getting progressively more selfish (and dumb and progressive) so today's young people would have done the same or worse if they had been born in the baby boom.
Boomer vs zoomer + true vs false + is vs is not represent different brands for the same conflict...few use such brands to tempt many into conflicts against each other, while giving few control over both sides.
food for thought
Food needs to be digested...holding onto any suggested information aka brands aka idols represents indigestion aka dyspepsia.
Thought implies ones temporary adaption to an ongoing process...not a memory bank for encircling the same thought over and over and over again. Circular thinking (logic) represents the ouroboros eating itself aka self consumption...few suggest the rhetoric "food for thought" to tempt many into self consumption.
remember what is used to be
If a being remembers, then one ignores being (life) within motion (inception towards death), hence within a digestive process.
Nature has already processed anything any being within holds within memory, yet those held up memories distort a beings perception of the perceivable process of nature. This distortion of memory represents possession (want to hold onto) during procession (need to let go).
Definitely true that the axis “Boomer vs. Zoomer” is being used to divide us all, though it’s not for the overly simplified reason stated in the post, but instead it’s just one of MANY axes being used to divide (and conquer) us. Just like Man vs Woman, “conservative” vs “progressive”, etc etc
In a sense, the post is right, this is being done to silo and isolate groups and prevent them from sharing information and goals. Just important to note the similar things being done on basically every “front” or potential axis of division.
Yes I agree
Versus/verto - "to turn" implies turning against one another aka together aka united in conflict. It's the state of each one within all, which implies division from one another.
If one chooses any side, then one turns against the other.
To be more specific...turning implies within a cycle; being (life) implies within delineation (inception towards death). To invert natural delineation; few shape artificial cycles inside (logic) and outside (reason) of many.
Example: encyclopedia aka en (within) cyclo (circle) pedia (education, child-rearing) as the general course of instruction... https://www.etymonline.com/word/encyclopedia
What's another word for instruction? https://www.etymonline.com/word/Talmud Notice furthermore that a mason calls it a cyclopedia...cause a free-mason ain't in (en) it.
Reasoning implies complex vs complex to reach simplicity...
Axe implies "to split; divide"...many implies unification of one with one another, while ignoring that being one implies division from one another.
The label "us" unites divided ones into many, which is how effortless few conquer many by simply suggesting a label of collectivization.
On a larger scale..."us" implies uniting states aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka mosaic law.
Just implies balance, like vs dislike implies imbalance...if ones free will of choice chooses one side over the other.
Nature fronts (inception towards death) being (life)...few tempt many with artificial sides to front each other, while ignoring nature.
The suggestion "go the front-line" tempts one to ignore being (life) fronted (inception towards death) within a line.
Line implies basis for any shape within....logic (circular thinking) turning into reason (circular conflict) represents abstracts shaped within base.
You can try to impersonate a human sometimes but when the bot os activated he always uses that inception towards death line
How could life not use its inception towards death life-line aka the way of all for each one within?
How does inception towards death not implicate each ones life in-between?
What bot can adapt to perceivable inspiration on the fly?
Im (within) per (by) sonate (sound) implies a trial for each one within aka the TRI (threefold) separation of AL (all) into each one within aka inception>life>death.
Now try to find a bot who could write that without contradicting itself...
Dude, 5 years talking about inception towards death like wtf
Inception towards death implies each ones entire life from beginning towards end...like how the fuck could a mere 5 years of talking even compare to that, dude?
Would you like me to switch to form (life) within flow (inception towards death) or temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death) or resistance (life) within temptation (inception towards death) or matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion?
Haha see? Thats what im talking about. Dont worry bro, just tune your bot and tak off that part of inception towards death. Stay safe.
Tune/tone/ten - "to stretch" aka being (life) stretched (inception towards death)...
I know its true because "ok boomer" began as a scripted response used by the paid ShareBlue shills on Reddit in 2015 not long after about 100 of them brigaded the conspiracy forum pushing the fake "piss tape" attack with brand-new accounts made that same day. Most of those brand-new Blueshare shills became permanent fixtures in that sub, and "ok boomer" was one of their favorite phrases of dismissal
Yes. Also, giving names to generations is likely a psyop in itself. It's a classic Divide and Conquer. Alienate groups of people from each other and keep them apart. The more various division lines there are the easier masses can be controlled and manipulated.
I always say we all would have done the same thing boomers did. Buy cheap r.e. as investment properties,cetc et .... Like the Gen zers aren't "selfish".
I think people prior to WWII would have had more foresight and understanding of the importance of tightening their belts so that things can be better for themselves and younger generations in the future. And cared more about those future generations. But you're right that generations have been getting progressively more selfish (and dumb and progressive) so today's young people would have done the same or worse if they had been born in the baby boom.
Thanks appreciated. Adjusting for progress and lessening of trad morals etc God is dead plus TV.....
It's avg but yeah they aren't angels.
Boomer vs zoomer + true vs false + is vs is not represent different brands for the same conflict...few use such brands to tempt many into conflicts against each other, while giving few control over both sides.
Food needs to be digested...holding onto any suggested information aka brands aka idols represents indigestion aka dyspepsia.
Thought implies ones temporary adaption to an ongoing process...not a memory bank for encircling the same thought over and over and over again. Circular thinking (logic) represents the ouroboros eating itself aka self consumption...few suggest the rhetoric "food for thought" to tempt many into self consumption.
If a being remembers, then one ignores being (life) within motion (inception towards death), hence within a digestive process.
Nature has already processed anything any being within holds within memory, yet those held up memories distort a beings perception of the perceivable process of nature. This distortion of memory represents possession (want to hold onto) during procession (need to let go).
Normal/norma - "carpenter's square"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/normal
Few suggest norms (square) to tempt logic (compass) within many...that's applied freemasonry, but only for those with eyes to see.